Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

55 Million Babies Killed Since Roe v. Wade; 1/3 of a Generation.

24

Comments

  • death2ducksdeath2ducks Member Posts: 991

    dnc said:

    dnc said:


    can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?

    I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?

    +1

    Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.

    Serious question: When does life begin?

    Now you're talking.

    This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
    Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.

    Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.

    This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.

    Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
    Some states already have this in the form of 24 hour laws that make certain the female wants to have the abortion.

    It shouldn't be a shaming event, however.

    Your last two paragraphs make you sound like a douche who wants to control female behavior. People have sex. Deal with it.
    You and your Middlebury hookup can't figure out how not to get pregnant? So, I guess you're both not very fucking smart after all.

  • dnc said:

    dnc said:


    can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?

    I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?

    +1

    Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.

    Serious question: When does life begin?

    Now you're talking.

    This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
    Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.

    Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.

    This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.

    Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
    Some states already have this in the form of 24 hour laws that make certain the female wants to have the abortion.

    It shouldn't be a shaming event, however.

    Your last two paragraphs make you sound like a douche who wants to control female behavior. People have sex. Deal with it.
    You and your Middlebury hookup can't figure out how not to get pregnant? So, I guess you're both not very fucking smart after all.

    You are so fucking stupid, it's laughable.
  • dnc said:

    dnc said:


    can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?

    I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?

    +1

    Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.



    Serious question: When does life begin?

    Now you're talking.

    This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
    Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.

    Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.

    This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.

    Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
    Over the past 40 years, there have been 150 million births in the US and 55 million abortions. Roe v. Wade was 1974, 10 years after the introduction of the pill. For 40 years, 1 abortion for every 3 births. That's birth control by abortion. That's NOT what we were sold 40 years ago.

    Over those 40 years, government didn't pay for those abortions, Planned Parenthood did the biggest number with your tax dollars, however.

    The question I have is, what will happen to that ratio now that Obamacare pays for abortion with tax subsidies or pays for the entire thing via Medicaid? Answer, more abortions.

    These aren't "accidents". Women don't have to get pregnant. We solved that problem 50 years ago. Now we even have "Plan B". This is murder, and Obama just raised the Murder Rate.

    What does the percentage need to rise to? If 50% of pregnancy ends in abortion, will that persuade you that it's murder? With no direct government subsidy for abortion, it's been 25% for the past 40 years. It's now going higher.

    Statistics is my "wheelhouse".

    It's not murder.

    Hth
  • dnc said:

    dnc said:


    can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?

    I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?

    +1

    Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.



    Serious question: When does life begin?

    Now you're talking.

    This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
    Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.

    Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.

    This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.

    Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
    Over the past 40 years, there have been 150 million births in the US and 55 million abortions. Roe v. Wade was 1974, 10 years after the introduction of the pill. For 40 years, 1 abortion for every 3 births. That's birth control by abortion. That's NOT what we were sold 40 years ago.

    Over those 40 years, government didn't pay for those abortions, Planned Parenthood did the biggest number with your tax dollars, however.

    The question I have is, what will happen to that ratio now that Obamacare pays for abortion with tax subsidies or pays for the entire thing via Medicaid? Answer, more abortions.

    These aren't "accidents". Women don't have to get pregnant. We solved that problem 50 years ago. Now we even have "Plan B". This is murder, and Obama just raised the Murder Rate.

    What does the percentage need to rise to? If 50% of pregnancy ends in abortion, will that persuade you that it's murder? With no direct government subsidy for abortion, it's been 25% for the past 40 years. It's now going higher.

    Statistics is my "wheelhouse".

    Your wheelhouse is hating gays, women, and blacks.

    Hth
  • death2ducksdeath2ducks Member Posts: 991

    dnc said:

    dnc said:


    can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?

    I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?

    +1

    Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.



    Serious question: When does life begin?

    Now you're talking.

    This is the essence of the abortion debate. If you're not sure either way, you should probably oppose it.
    Though I try to stay out of this debate, I will throw this bone out there. There were a group of students at a university, the "pro lifers" that were displaying posters of what a partial birth abortion looks like. They've got a right to do that, free speech. Then another group of students, the "pro choicers" covered up their posters with blankets to hide the graphic photos. These are the same pro choicers that demand their 'freedom' but don't care about trampling on the freedom of others.

    Now if you make the 'choice' to have an abortion, I think you need to be made fully aware of what that 'choice' entails. You need to see all the graphic details before you do it, since you've decided to make the 'choice' to stray into a very gray area that 50% or more of the population believes to be murder. You need to see photos like the ones those students were displaying. You need to see a film detailing an abortion procedure. In addition to this there should be an on-screen display of the procedure as you're having it so that later on if your conscience starts troubling you, you won't be able to make the excuse that you really didn't understand what it all meant. If after that you continue anyway, you should get a compulsory spaying along with your abortion. That way you can have sex all you want without any consequences in the future. The trade-off is that you will not have a second chance to play God.

    This will force many people to really start thinking about what the value of a human life is. It would cut down on abortions, it would cut down on sex without contraception, and it would completely eliminate 2nd, 3rd and 4th abortions by hoes that just can't stop doing what they're doing. It may even cut down on the general birth-rate as smart women who want to have kids one day but don't want them at the moment, will reconsider having unprotected sex for the thrill of the moment.

    Instances of rape, medical threats to the mother and of course the Obama fuckface wanting the rest of us to pay for your choice, muddies this divisive issue even further.
    Over the past 40 years, there have been 150 million births in the US and 55 million abortions. Roe v. Wade was 1974, 10 years after the introduction of the pill. For 40 years, 1 abortion for every 3 births. That's birth control by abortion. That's NOT what we were sold 40 years ago.

    Over those 40 years, government didn't pay for those abortions, Planned Parenthood did the biggest number with your tax dollars, however.

    The question I have is, what will happen to that ratio now that Obamacare pays for abortion with tax subsidies or pays for the entire thing via Medicaid? Answer, more abortions.

    These aren't "accidents". Women don't have to get pregnant. We solved that problem 50 years ago. Now we even have "Plan B". This is murder, and Obama just raised the Murder Rate.

    What does the percentage need to rise to? If 50% of pregnancy ends in abortion, will that persuade you that it's murder? With no direct government subsidy for abortion, it's been 25% for the past 40 years. It's now going higher.

    Statistics is my "wheelhouse".

    Your wheelhouse is hating gays, women, and blacks.

    Hth
    image

  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    What's a wheelhouse, some kind of factory?
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    This thread makes me wonder why I ever venture to the general board.
  • DeepPurpleDeepPurple Member Posts: 201
    I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    dnc said:


    can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?

    I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?

    +1

    Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.

    Serious question: When does life begin?

    When you get your drivers license

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    I like to be d2dfs and complain about too many Americans in one thread then complain that we need 55 million more Americans in another thread.

    I do that.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,660 Founders Club

    I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...

    Do you support the death penalty?
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...

    I think DNC covered this pretty well on page 1.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,000

    6 Million Jews? Try 55 Million American Babies. Who knows, one of them might have discovered a cure for cancer. 40 years ago today, Roe v. Wade was decided. It needs to be a day of reflection.

    lifenews.com/2013/01/22/i-am-overwhelmed-by-55-million-babies-killed-since-roe-v-wade/

    image

    I'm sure someone has punched that whore who brought you into the world square in the mouth for not having met her obligation to use the shop vac after that homeless guy mounted her and you were thus conceived.

    Punch her again for me anyway. She really should have had you scraped off the ute! Sorry. But it's true.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    6 Million Jews? Try 55 Million American Babies. Who knows, one of them might have discovered a cure for cancer. 40 years ago today, Roe v. Wade was decided. It needs to be a day of reflection.

    lifenews.com/2013/01/22/i-am-overwhelmed-by-55-million-babies-killed-since-roe-v-wade/

    image

    I'm sure someone has punched that whore who brought you into the world square in the mouth for not having met her obligation to use the shop vac after that homeless guy mounted her and you were thus conceived.

    Punch her again for me anyway. She really should have had you scraped off the ute! Sorry. But it's true.
    Awesome'd, but that doesn't feel like enough.
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    I don't like abortion. But what I like and don't like is of little consequence to other people.

    I am amused people who want the rights of women would throw blankets over what they find offensive. Freedom is a 2 way street.

    I am amused Planned Parenthood no longer wants to call it pro-choice.

    I wonder what is worse ... allowing an ill equipped woman to abort or having to deal with the issue of neglect and heartbreak those children would have to endure.

    Freakanomics talks about the correlation between abortion and the drop in crime.

    I happily married with two wonderful sons ... we made the right choice. I am sure those who chose to abort made the right choice for themselves.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,000
    topdawgnc said:

    I don't like abortion. But what I like and don't like is of little consequence to other people.

    I am amused people who want the rights of women would throw blankets over what they find offensive. Freedom is a 2 way street.

    I am amused Planned Parenthood no longer wants to call it pro-choice.

    I wonder what is worse ... allowing an ill equipped woman to abort or having to deal with the issue of neglect and heartbreak those children would have to endure.

    Freakanomics talks about the correlation between abortion and the drop in crime.

    I happily married with two wonderful sons ... we made the right choice. I am sure those who chose to abort made the right choice for themselves.

    what the fuck does this have to do with the Affordable Care Act? get back on topic tops.
  • DeepPurpleDeepPurple Member Posts: 201

    I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...

    Do you support the death penalty?
    Yes.

    I also support sterilizing those that are unfit to be parents.

    Contributing to the population should be limited to those that have the ability to not fuck it up.
Sign In or Register to comment.