morris has heart and the O deserved a chance to win the game. the D is absolutely heartless, trash.
Comments
-
Worst part about this is im 81% sure Morris scores a walkoff td if given another chance
-
Agree. They couldn’t stop our passing game all day. Boggles my mind why we didn’t throw more!PostGameOrangeSlices said:Worst part about this is im 81% sure Morris scores a walkoff td if given another chance
-
We stopped ourselves in first half with penalties and punting twice when we should have gone on 4th down.
Seven of those runs were Morris scrambles (maybe one designed iirc) so it wasn’t that uneven. -
A little bit of SR leadership would have been good. Bronson, who on his best day is average and a bunch of SO and FR who are talented but maybe could have used a guy like Levi on the field. That was my takeTommySQC said:
Are you saying that UW has no depth? Having 1 specific guy out vs a shitty Stanford team should make that muchnof a difference?BeerThirty said:not having Levi hurts hard
Fucking horrible take. This team shouldn't have missed a beat. This is on Jimmy. Nut the fuck up and fire your POS buddy if you want to be a winner.
Pete couldn't. That's why he quit. -
oh and fuck you @TommySQC
-
Bunch of drops by Culp and the WRs too. That holding call on Ty's TD with 10:00 minutes left in the 4th was also a killer.
-
Odunze had his best game and there were still a couple frustrating dropsKingdome_Urinals said:Bunch of drops by Culp and the WRs too. That holding call on Ty's TD with 10:00 minutes left in the 4th was also a killer.
-
Holding penalty sucked but we still couldn’t stop Stanford when we knew specifically if they were going to run or pass from every down after that. Really disappointing.Kingdome_Urinals said:Bunch of drops by Culp and the WRs too. That holding call on Ty's TD with 10:00 minutes left in the 4th was also a killer.
The defense is just not good. 3/4 games they got their shit pushed in on the run game. It is who they are at this point. -
Somehow this whole trope rolls out every year, that the defense sucks because it does what it's designed to do and as a result has been the #1 defense in the P12 for the past 81 years.
What is KwatFS is not figuring out that Stanford will do this every year, run "big boy" (ILTCIBB, ILTDT) formations over our 2 DL formations. Your bending defense is breaking giving up drives of 11, 9, 9, 14, 7, 6, 2 (TO), and 14 plays.
I'm pretty stupid, but how about a different base defense with your top 8 line stuffers rotating through 4 down linemen and 12 best tacklers situationally subbed in and out? Anything is better than a front 8 on 8 where we have a slight advantage at 1-2 positions, they have a slight advantage at 2-3, and they have a massive advantage at 4 positions. -
I know we have Alabama talent on defense, but I don't think right now weº really have the depth to put out that front.Emoterman said:Somehow this whole trope rolls out every year, that the defense sucks because it does what it's designed to do and as a result has been the #1 defense in the P12 for the past 81 years.
What is KwatFS is not figuring out that Stanford will do this every year, run "big boy" (ILTCIBB, ILTDT) formations over our 2 DL formations. Your bending defense is breaking giving up drives of 11, 9, 9, 14, 7, 6, 2 (TO), and 14 plays.
I'm pretty stupid, but how about a different base defense with your top 8 line stuffers rotating through 4 down linemen and 12 best tacklers situationally subbed in and out? Anything is better than a front 8 on 8 where we have a slight advantage at 1-2 positions, they have a slight advantage at 2-3, and they have a massive advantage at 4 positions.
