Another Trump's appeal bitch slapped
NEW: The Trump campaign has lost again in its Pennsylvania case — the 3rd Circuit rejected its appeal.
— Zoe Tillman (@ZoeTillman) November 27, 2020
Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump nominee, eviscerates Trump's case from top to bottom: "The Campaign’s claims have no merit."https://t.co/3NJzsJPiTX pic.twitter.com/xbGg9qze4U
Comments
-
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
-
Rudy won't lie so much in court filings. All 3 of the judges are conservative. The "big lie" only works so far!HHusky said:“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
-
Wait til Trump gets his judges in there! Oh wait..
-
The Trumptards are silent on this. Silly "hearings" in hotel conference centers are not legal cases! -- although the Rudy/Trump liar team try to conflate the two, it ain't going to cut it.insinceredawg said:Wait til Trump gets his judges in there! Oh wait..
-
Additionally, 1,700,492 affidavits that weren’t made under penalty of perjury also are not evidence.AOG said:
The Trumptards are silent on this. Silly "hearings" in hotel conference centers are not legal cases! -- although the Rudy/Trump liar team try to conflate the two, it ain't going to cut it.insinceredawg said:Wait til Trump gets his judges in there! Oh wait..
-
Is your contention that affidavits do not contain disclosures and affirmation of perjury penalties?MelloDawg said:
Additionally, 1,700,492 affidavits that weren’t made under penalty of perjury also are not evidence.AOG said:
The Trumptards are silent on this. Silly "hearings" in hotel conference centers are not legal cases! -- although the Rudy/Trump liar team try to conflate the two, it ain't going to cut it.insinceredawg said:Wait til Trump gets his judges in there! Oh wait..
-
Is @MelloDawg saying that sworn first-hand affidavits presented to a court as evidence are exempt from perjury charges? Is that what he’s saying?PurpleThrobber said:
Is your contention that affidavits do not contain disclosures and affirmation of perjury penalties?MelloDawg said:
Additionally, 1,700,492 affidavits that weren’t made under penalty of perjury also are not evidence.AOG said:
The Trumptards are silent on this. Silly "hearings" in hotel conference centers are not legal cases! -- although the Rudy/Trump liar team try to conflate the two, it ain't going to cut it.insinceredawg said:Wait til Trump gets his judges in there! Oh wait..
-
If appears so.NorthwestFresh said:
Is @MelloDawg saying that sworn first-hand affidavits presented to a court as evidence are exempt from perjury charges? Is that what he’s saying?PurpleThrobber said:
Is your contention that affidavits do not contain disclosures and affirmation of perjury penalties?MelloDawg said:
Additionally, 1,700,492 affidavits that weren’t made under penalty of perjury also are not evidence.AOG said:
The Trumptards are silent on this. Silly "hearings" in hotel conference centers are not legal cases! -- although the Rudy/Trump liar team try to conflate the two, it ain't going to cut it.insinceredawg said:Wait til Trump gets his judges in there! Oh wait..
That would be highly unusual as affadavits are admissible evidence and also contain perjury disclosure.
Unless the Dazzler prepared them, then who know what the fuck they may contain. -
It’s very cute when they learn new words and phrases, like “affidavit” and “banana republic”, and have no clue what they mean.
-
At your advanced age, how many legal proceedings have you been involved in?TheKobeStopper said:It’s very cute when they learn new words and phrases, like “affidavit” and “banana republic”, and have no clue what they mean.
And how many affidavits have you signed?
