Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!









Show your support for what this community means to you:
Choose a Donation Amount
Username
(required for credit)
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Worst offensive play calling in a decade

124»

Comments

  • rodmansragerodmansrage Posts: 3,002
    5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments Sixth Anniversary
    s&p+'s final 19 rankings had us? #16. a fuckin 8-5 corpse of a football team with bullshit losses to colorado who was 81st and stanford who was 88.


    should have hung a banner for being top 20 in the analytics rankings imo.


    fucking analytics, dont show me the stats, show me what i did or need to do to achieve those stats, this is subtle but grossly glossed over in the realm of football analytics.
  • 23, 25, and 28 yard FG attempts says they still struggle to finish.

    Even 2/3 of UW's touchdowns came on their RBs breaking their longest runs of the night.

    Basically, while it's only one gayme, so far I like the offense a lot more outside of the 10 than near the goal line.

    Hopefully they improve. EWIWBI
    1to392831weretaken
  • Edwin_BambinoEdwin_Bambino Posts: 2,385
    5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 250 Answers 1000 Comments

    I honestly don’t get the people freaking out at all.

    They had a conservative run first game plan in a game with shitty weather and a completely new QB. It worked. If special teams doesn’t spot the beavs 10 points we aren’t even having this discussion.

    And for all of the hand wringing about the defense they gave up 14 points. There clearly is stuff to improve on but I don’t think anyone was under the impression this was anything other than a transition year.

    See now I wrote basically the same thing but was downvoted to oblivion and yet you are upvoted to eternity.

    It is the way
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Posts: 3,981
    5,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes Sixth Anniversary 2500 Comments

    I honestly don’t get the people freaking out at all.

    They had a conservative run first game plan in a game with shitty weather and a completely new QB. It worked. If special teams doesn’t spot the beavs 10 points we aren’t even having this discussion.

    And for all of the hand wringing about the defense they gave up 14 points. There clearly is stuff to improve on but I don’t think anyone was under the impression this was anything other than a transition year.

    See now I wrote basically the same thing but was downvoted to oblivion and yet you are upvoted to eternity.

    It is the way
    So say we all.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Posts: 8,645
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 5000 Comments
    I thought we wanted to take advantage of our size and talent and just fuck up little brother programs by running it down their throats.

    I was ok with that game plan for this game.

    Still think we are probably doomed don't twist. We beat boovers at home by 6.
    CanadawgCFetters_Nacho_LoverEmoterman
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Posts: 26,218
    10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 25000 Comments Seventh Anniversary
    Gladstone said:

    lmao i loved the offense tbh

    i imagine we'll open it up quite a bit more vs UA

    I’m hoping the weather had to do with not throwing it downfield much. No QB is going to get in a rhythm with three step drops and fitting short passes into tight windows.
    haieCFetters_Nacho_Lover
  • CanadawgCanadawg Posts: 485
    250 Answers 500 Awesomes 250 Up Votes 100 Comments
    That was pretty awesome football to watch. Personal preference obviously but you do not see a ground game like that very often and UW looked like they didn't even execute that well.
    HuskyJW
  • DoogCouricsDoogCourics Posts: 5,416
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 5000 Comments

    WTF ... an offensive scheme from 1992 .... Donovan is a total POS - way under qualified. What an ass





    CFetters_Nacho_Lover
Sign In or Register to comment.