Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.
Two different kinds of skeptics.
He was good when he agreed with the crowd. When he thought for himself he had to be discredited. Just like us half brains. Not you. You're out Fredo
He doesn't think for himself and his science is shitty.
Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.
Two different kinds of skeptics.
He was good when he agreed with the crowd. When he thought for himself he had to be discredited. Just like us half brains. Not you. You're out Fredo
He doesn't think for himself and his science is shitty.
Hth
Riiiight
You are kind of an expert on not thinking for yourself
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
Why do you only point out things when CollegeDoog is wrong?
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
+1
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
+1
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
+1
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
+1
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.
Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.
Comments
Hth
Riiiight
You are kind of an expert on not thinking for yourself
Everybody says so
Oh wait, that's who we half brains mocked.
You're out Fredo
He argues against literally all the hard data.
It's mind boggling that you take his word for anything.
REAL science is all about skepticism just like REAL half brains
You're out Fredo
Stick to real estate and sports.
Everybody says so
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
Abundance?
So there's that.