This is a pretty balanced look at climate change
Comments
-
Skeptics are the half brains. You're swallowing Ty's cum
HTH
Skeptics questioned Hitler -
The skeptics have never been right about anything Mr. Section14aRaceBannon said:Skeptics are the half brains. You're swallowing Ty's cum
HTH
Skeptics questioned Hitler
Calling Richard Lindzen a respected voice on climate change is like gargling Herbstreit's cum for saying Sark is the best playcaller in America.
-
Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team -
I like to believe everything I am told and then compare myself to the people that didn't believe a fucking thing.
I'm CollegeDoogFuckingStupid like that -
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.RaceBannon said:Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Two different kinds of skeptics. -
The doogs held out hope against mountains of scientific analysis and comparison conveying that Sark and Ty were bad coaches.RaceBannon said:I like to believe everything I am told and then compare myself to the people that didn't believe a fucking thing.
I'm CollegeDoogFuckingStupid like that
The climate skeptics are doing the same thing.
hth -
Just so we're clear, you could call 9/11 truthers "skeptics".
-
He was good when he agreed with the crowd. When he thought for himself he had to be discredited. Just like us half brains. Not you. You're out FredoCollegeDoog said:
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.RaceBannon said:Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Two different kinds of skeptics. -
No. Not even closeCollegeDoog said:
The doogs held out hope against mountains of scientific analysis and comparison conveying that Sark and Ty were bad coaches.RaceBannon said:I like to believe everything I am told and then compare myself to the people that didn't believe a fucking thing.
I'm CollegeDoogFuckingStupid like that
The climate skeptics are doing the same thing.
hth
I'm not holding out hope for anything because there is nothing to hope for. We're not all going to die. Sorry to disappoint you.
Rather than following the crowd of everybody says so we think for ourselves. You're out Fredo -
My solution
-
He doesn't think for himself and his science is shitty.RaceBannon said:
He was good when he agreed with the crowd. When he thought for himself he had to be discredited. Just like us half brains. Not you. You're out FredoCollegeDoog said:
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.RaceBannon said:Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Two different kinds of skeptics.
Hth
-
CollegeDoog said:
He doesn't think for himself and his science is shitty.RaceBannon said:
He was good when he agreed with the crowd. When he thought for himself he had to be discredited. Just like us half brains. Not you. You're out FredoCollegeDoog said:
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.RaceBannon said:Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Two different kinds of skeptics.
Hth
Riiiight
You are kind of an expert on not thinking for yourself
Everybody says so
Oh wait, that's who we half brains mocked.
You're out Fredo -
http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Richard_Lindzen.htm
He argues against literally all the hard data.
It's mind boggling that you take his word for anything. -
Everyone knows the earth is flat. Excommunicate him!
REAL science is all about skepticism just like REAL half brains
You're out Fredo -
And all the REAL scientists have listened to skeptics claims, taken them into account when assessing the data, and deemed them unfounded.RaceBannon said:Everyone knows the earth is flat. Excommunicate him!
REAL science is all about skepticism just like REAL half brains
You're out Fredo
Stick to real estate and sports. -
Ah yes the settled science fraud. The last refuge of a doogCollegeDoog said:
And all the REAL scientists have listened to skeptics claims, taken them into account when assessing the data, and deemed them unfounded.RaceBannon said:Everyone knows the earth is flat. Excommunicate him!
REAL science is all about skepticism just like REAL half brains
You're out Fredo
Stick to real estate and sports.
Everybody says so -
-
Didn't know you were secretly death2ducks.CuntWaffle said:
-
CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
-
Why do you only point out things when CollegeDoog is wrong?MikeDamone said:CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
-
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.MikeDamone said:CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite. -
CollegeDoog said:
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.MikeDamone said:CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
-
Funny how CollegeDoog is so worried about these people yet has no issues with Todd Doxey jokes. Such a gentleman.
-
+1CollegeDoog said:
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.MikeDamone said:CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
-
I can't tell if this thread is full of win or full of fail.
Abundance? -
I'm for internet bullying.dnc said:
+1CollegeDoog said:
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.MikeDamone said:CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
So there's that.
-
I support the troopsdnc said:
+1CollegeDoog said:
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.MikeDamone said:CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes
-
War?MikeDamone said:
I support the troopsdnc said:
+1CollegeDoog said:
The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.MikeDamone said:CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.
If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.
You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.
The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.
There's a sound bite.
I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes -
Are you talking about Lindzen or Derek Johnson?CollegeDoog said:
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.RaceBannon said:Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Two different kinds of skeptics.
-
Abundance. As always.RoadDawg55 said:
Are you talking about Lindzen or Derek Johnson?CollegeDoog said:
Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.RaceBannon said:Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.
You wouldn't even make the scout team
Two different kinds of skeptics.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
