Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

St. Louis Couple Who Showed Guns Charged with Felonies

124»

Comments

  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042

    trublue said:

    They busted through an iron gate to enter their private property. Minor factoid to the fake OSEwe poaster.

    Oh this tard is a fake beaver?
    Acco

    trublue said:

    They busted through an iron gate to enter their private property. Minor factoid to the fake OSEwe poaster.

    Oh this tard is a fake beaver?

    trublue said:

    They busted through an iron gate to enter their private property. Minor factoid to the fake OSEwe poaster.

    Oh this tard is a fake beaver?
    According to a poast by “Benny”, he/she/it is a UW graduate, Class of 2003.

    Perhaps, he/she/it wishes he/she/it had graduated from OSEwe.

  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    The obsession continues...
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited July 2020
    Wasn’t operational when being held but it COULD be re-assembled so why not overcharge?

    Prosecutors are mostly the biggest pieces of shit of all attorneys. Even more than Senior Scammers such as @HHusky.



    The gun Patricia McCloskey waved at protesters was inoperable when it arrived at the St. Louis police crime lab, but a member of Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner’s staff ordered crime lab experts to disassemble and reassemble it and wrote that it was “readily capable of lethal use” in charging documents filed Monday, 5 On Your Side has learned.

    In Missouri, police and prosecutors must prove that a weapon is “readily” capable of lethal use when it is used in the type of crime with which the McCloskeys have been charged.

    Assistant Circuit Attorney Chris Hinckley ordered crime lab staff members to field strip the handgun and found it had been assembled incorrectly. Specifically, the firing pin spring was put in front of the firing pin, which was backward, and made the gun incapable of firing, according to documents obtained by 5 On Your Side.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,386 Standard Supporter
    The lefty loons doctor evidence? Never.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,579

    Wasn’t operational when being held but it COULD be re-assembled so why not overcharge?

    Prosecutors are mostly the biggest pieces of shit of all attorneys. Even more than Senior Scammers such as @HHusky.



    The gun Patricia McCloskey waved at protesters was inoperable when it arrived at the St. Louis police crime lab, but a member of Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner’s staff ordered crime lab experts to disassemble and reassemble it and wrote that it was “readily capable of lethal use” in charging documents filed Monday, 5 On Your Side has learned.

    In Missouri, police and prosecutors must prove that a weapon is “readily” capable of lethal use when it is used in the type of crime with which the McCloskeys have been charged.

    Assistant Circuit Attorney Chris Hinckley ordered crime lab staff members to field strip the handgun and found it had been assembled incorrectly. Specifically, the firing pin spring was put in front of the firing pin, which was backward, and made the gun incapable of firing, according to documents obtained by 5 On Your Side.
    Two crates of pipe bombs?!
Sign In or Register to comment.