Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Brought a skateboard to a gun fight.
Comments
-
So what about the pack of goons that followed the guy and gang attacked him? Seems like a separate incident and I’m glad that black-clad LARPer with the backpack got shot. Oh well, do stupid shit, expect the worst. Kind of like your dipshit friend with the house on the lake taking his son out for a stroll into a riot.creepycoug said:
Not twisting. But you and I, and every other mentally balanced adult, would have walked 5 or so yards in either direction away from her, or used a better first step, and just make our way around. Or, better yet, we wouldn't GAF and assess it wasn't worth engaging with someone in an already cranked up situation.Fenderbender123 said:The way I see it is that he was not trying to touch her or assault her at all. He simply wanted around her and so she purposely stepped in his way with her arms stretched out and shoulder against him.
I'm somewhere in the middle. It isn't something that warrants being dragged to the ground, but it's also not nothing either. It's an action that in my experience causes people to become agitated. Not victim blaming, so don't twist.
I know guys like him. I think in all liklihood he was looking for a fight and wanted that shit to happen. Not the shoot-out. But the scuffle with the chick. He doesn't portray as the image of a normal person saying "excuse me. may I pass through? i'm just on my way." -
You are wrong. But don't let me stop you.dnc said:
There is nothing at all criminal about what she's doing.TurdBomber said:
Nevermind that it's the law.dnc said:
Criminal assault?TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
This is the snowflakiest post ever.
Holy shit pull your tampon out man.
Sorry if that inconvenience interferes with your ignorance.
No DA in the country would take that case.
IRYK
STOp. -
Okay make your argument. What exactly does she do to assault him. Put her arms out? Graze him with her shoulder? At what point in the video do her actions come anywhere near the line of criminality?TurdBomber said:
You are wrong. But don't let me stop you.dnc said:
There is nothing at all criminal about what she's doing.TurdBomber said:
Nevermind that it's the law.dnc said:
Criminal assault?TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
This is the snowflakiest post ever.
Holy shit pull your tampon out man.
Sorry if that inconvenience interferes with your ignorance.
No DA in the country would take that case.
IRYK
STOp. -
Yes, you join a pack of goons and start beating on someone who's running away from you and you bought what you get. Regardless of whether the guy is a tool.NorthwestFresh said:
So what about the pack of goons that followed the guy and gang attacked him? Seems like a separate incident and I’m glad that black-clad LARPer with the backpack got shot. Oh well, do stupid shit, expect the worst. Kind of like your dipshit friend with the house on the lake taking his son out for a stroll into a riot.creepycoug said:
Not twisting. But you and I, and every other mentally balanced adult, would have walked 5 or so yards in either direction away from her, or used a better first step, and just make our way around. Or, better yet, we wouldn't GAF and assess it wasn't worth engaging with someone in an already cranked up situation.Fenderbender123 said:The way I see it is that he was not trying to touch her or assault her at all. He simply wanted around her and so she purposely stepped in his way with her arms stretched out and shoulder against him.
I'm somewhere in the middle. It isn't something that warrants being dragged to the ground, but it's also not nothing either. It's an action that in my experience causes people to become agitated. Not victim blaming, so don't twist.
I know guys like him. I think in all liklihood he was looking for a fight and wanted that shit to happen. Not the shoot-out. But the scuffle with the chick. He doesn't portray as the image of a normal person saying "excuse me. may I pass through? i'm just on my way."
Not like my friend at all, who is anything but a dipshit. We all make mistakes. -
I was mostly responding to (triggered by) the notion that she had made some sort of very aggressive contact with him using her shoulder, which I didn't see as a big deal and certainly something you or I would have just walked away from.TurdBomber said:
Sorry Creep, but what she's doing is illegal and codified in the law. You can't "restrain" someone from going where they want to go. I wouldn't have done what the guy did, and as I stated, his force would probably be deemed unreasonable, subjecting him to charges of his own. She technically has no legal right to impede or restrain his movement.creepycoug said:
Based solely on that one clip - freely admit I've not seen others - no, I don't agree she's criminally assaulting him with that little shoulder nudge to get him off of her jock. I get bumped harder by little Asian women at the Holiday Lane parade in Bellevue. If she did something more before that, then maybe. But like I said - I literally get that much contact at the meet freezer at Costco.TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
Why this matters is because it's happening daily, all over the CHAZ, and those ignorant fucks are breaking the law every time they step in front and make contact with people by pushing or grabbing them. A lot of CHAZ outsiders are missing Golden Opportunities to clock those skinny legged fucks every day, because they don't know the law. And that makes me sad. -
Without legal authority or consent, intentionally contacts him at least twice, maintains her screen as he moves right to avoid her (doubling down on her obvious intent to block his path), impeding and restraining his ability to move in the path he desires, thereby denying him his well-recognized liberty interest to go where he wants.dnc said:
Okay make your argument. What exactly does she do to assault him. Put her arms out? Graze him with her shoulder? At what point in the video do her actions come anywhere near the line of criminality?TurdBomber said:
You are wrong. But don't let me stop you.dnc said:
There is nothing at all criminal about what she's doing.TurdBomber said:
Nevermind that it's the law.dnc said:
Criminal assault?TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
This is the snowflakiest post ever.
Holy shit pull your tampon out man.
Sorry if that inconvenience interferes with your ignorance.
No DA in the country would take that case.
IRYK
STOp.
Argue it all day long, or learn this lesson: You can't block other people from going where they want to go on public property. It's against the law. So is touching a person without their consent.
Sorry you didn't know this. Now you do. -
None of which constitutes criminal assault.TurdBomber said:
Without legal authority or consent, intentionally contacts him at least twice, maintains her screen as he moves right to avoid her (doubling down on her obvious intent to block his path), impeding and restraining his ability to move in the path he desires, thereby denying him his well-recognized liberty interest to go where he wants.dnc said:
Okay make your argument. What exactly does she do to assault him. Put her arms out? Graze him with her shoulder? At what point in the video do her actions come anywhere near the line of criminality?TurdBomber said:
You are wrong. But don't let me stop you.dnc said:
There is nothing at all criminal about what she's doing.TurdBomber said:
Nevermind that it's the law.dnc said:
Criminal assault?TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
This is the snowflakiest post ever.
Holy shit pull your tampon out man.
Sorry if that inconvenience interferes with your ignorance.
No DA in the country would take that case.
IRYK
STOp.
Argue it all day long, or learn this lesson: You can't block other people from going where they want to go on public property. It's against the law. So is touching a person without their consent.
Sorry you didn't know this. Now you do. -
Sounds like Dazzler's got himself a future partner. Or client.dnc said:
None of which constitutes criminal assault.TurdBomber said:
Without legal authority or consent, intentionally contacts him at least twice, maintains her screen as he moves right to avoid her (doubling down on her obvious intent to block his path), impeding and restraining his ability to move in the path he desires, thereby denying him his well-recognized liberty interest to go where he wants.dnc said:
Okay make your argument. What exactly does she do to assault him. Put her arms out? Graze him with her shoulder? At what point in the video do her actions come anywhere near the line of criminality?TurdBomber said:
You are wrong. But don't let me stop you.dnc said:
There is nothing at all criminal about what she's doing.TurdBomber said:
Nevermind that it's the law.dnc said:
Criminal assault?TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
This is the snowflakiest post ever.
Holy shit pull your tampon out man.
Sorry if that inconvenience interferes with your ignorance.
No DA in the country would take that case.
IRYK
STOp.
Argue it all day long, or learn this lesson: You can't block other people from going where they want to go on public property. It's against the law. So is touching a person without their consent.
Sorry you didn't know this. Now you do. -
This is not true in my state but you know, differences.dnc said:
None of which constitutes criminal assault.TurdBomber said:
Without legal authority or consent, intentionally contacts him at least twice, maintains her screen as he moves right to avoid her (doubling down on her obvious intent to block his path), impeding and restraining his ability to move in the path he desires, thereby denying him his well-recognized liberty interest to go where he wants.dnc said:
Okay make your argument. What exactly does she do to assault him. Put her arms out? Graze him with her shoulder? At what point in the video do her actions come anywhere near the line of criminality?TurdBomber said:
You are wrong. But don't let me stop you.dnc said:
There is nothing at all criminal about what she's doing.TurdBomber said:
Nevermind that it's the law.dnc said:
Criminal assault?TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
This is the snowflakiest post ever.
Holy shit pull your tampon out man.
Sorry if that inconvenience interferes with your ignorance.
No DA in the country would take that case.
IRYK
STOp.
Argue it all day long, or learn this lesson: You can't block other people from going where they want to go on public property. It's against the law. So is touching a person without their consent.
Sorry you didn't know this. Now you do.
What she's doing would be considered assault here. Would it get tossed in court? Probably. Would she get hauled off until then? Very possible. Especially if gender was out of the equation.
You can't restrain people without their consent in a public place.
Would he get hauled off too for his response? Definitely.
This is all legal fluff but I can tell you how I know it from my state.
His response was outsized. In turn, they were probably going to stab him and leave him for dead. Also outsized.
Escalation is going to continue as long as the Dems in charge allow this shit. Probably part of their desire as then they can bring out the "right wing extremists" boogieman. They are already doing it. Look at the reporting on this case. -
You would have. Turd Eater would have shrieked in a high pitch that she'd committed criminal assault.creepycoug said:
I was mostly responding to (triggered by) the notion that she had made some sort of very aggressive contact with him using her shoulder, which I didn't see as a big deal and certainly something you or I would have just walked away from.TurdBomber said:
Sorry Creep, but what she's doing is illegal and codified in the law. You can't "restrain" someone from going where they want to go. I wouldn't have done what the guy did, and as I stated, his force would probably be deemed unreasonable, subjecting him to charges of his own. She technically has no legal right to impede or restrain his movement.creepycoug said:
Based solely on that one clip - freely admit I've not seen others - no, I don't agree she's criminally assaulting him with that little shoulder nudge to get him off of her jock. I get bumped harder by little Asian women at the Holiday Lane parade in Bellevue. If she did something more before that, then maybe. But like I said - I literally get that much contact at the meet freezer at Costco.TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
Why this matters is because it's happening daily, all over the CHAZ, and those ignorant fucks are breaking the law every time they step in front and make contact with people by pushing or grabbing them. A lot of CHAZ outsiders are missing Golden Opportunities to clock those skinny legged fucks every day, because they don't know the law. And that makes me sad.
