Kevin Thomson

backthepack

bananasnblondes said:

backthepack said:

In defense of Huff our pass pro schemes were fucktarded under Pete.

Possibly, but I've been really unimpressed with how our OL has played as a unit under Huff. It's your job to coach the offensive line and if you cant adapt to the offense, you've got problems. I'm hoping the younger guys who have been with Huff since the beginning will be hungry. Adams was clearly phoning it in last year.

Yeah. Our OL talent was garbage last year though.

1to392831weretaken

haie said:

I heard that Huff hated the offense and encouraging Pete to step down, if he wouldn't give up the offense entirely, was led by Huff, Malloe, and K.

And they all ran a pedophilia ring out of the U Village Joey.

ExtraChrisB said:

...which made Pete's aversion to dual threat guys frustrating.

Maybe it's a morning spent reading Teq's armchair athletic directoring, but the negativity is jumping the shark around here. There is zero evidence that Petersen had an aversion to dual threat quarterbacks. He offered plenty, and none committed. I don't think his offense was one that wanted the quarterback keeping on designed runs a lot, but no coach ever thought to himself, "I'd prefer that my quarterback can't run."

Browning played because he was the best option on the roster. Browning starting as a freshman made it hard to recruit ANY quarterback, let alone a dual-threat. That left the cupboards pretty bare post-Browning, and everyone here would have flipped their shit had he started the way more mobile Heinous over Eason. Speaking of Eason, the common understanding is Eason's recruitment led to an overreaction of offering quarterbacks early, hence Morris over Millen.

I think Petersen would have loved to have a quarterback that could pull and keep every once in a while, but what do I know.

Kingdome_Urinals

1to392831weretaken said:

haie said:

I heard that Huff hated the offense and encouraging Pete to step down, if he wouldn't give up the offense entirely, was led by Huff, Malloe, and K.

And they all ran a pedophilia ring out of the U Village Joey.

ExtraChrisB said:

...which made Pete's aversion to dual threat guys frustrating.

Maybe it's a morning spent reading Teq's armchair athletic directoring, but the negativity is jumping the shark around here. There is zero evidence that Petersen had an aversion to dual threat quarterbacks. He offered plenty, and none committed. I don't think his offense was one that wanted the quarterback keeping on designed runs a lot, but no coach ever thought to himself, "I'd prefer that my quarterback can't run."

Browning played because he was the best option on the roster. Browning starting as a freshman made it hard to recruit ANY quarterback, let alone a dual-threat. That left the cupboards pretty bare post-Browning, and everyone here would have flipped their shit had he started the way more mobile Heinous over Eason. Speaking of Eason, the common understanding is Eason's recruitment led to an overreaction of offering quarterbacks early, hence Morris over Millen.

I think Petersen would have loved to have a quarterback that could pull and keep every once in a while, but what do I know.

Signed Yankoff who is mobile.

whatshouldicareabout

Kingdome_Urinals said:

1to392831weretaken said:

haie said:

I heard that Huff hated the offense and encouraging Pete to step down, if he wouldn't give up the offense entirely, was led by Huff, Malloe, and K.

And they all ran a pedophilia ring out of the U Village Joey.

ExtraChrisB said:

...which made Pete's aversion to dual threat guys frustrating.

Maybe it's a morning spent reading Teq's armchair athletic directoring, but the negativity is jumping the shark around here. There is zero evidence that Petersen had an aversion to dual threat quarterbacks. He offered plenty, and none committed. I don't think his offense was one that wanted the quarterback keeping on designed runs a lot, but no coach ever thought to himself, "I'd prefer that my quarterback can't run."

Browning played because he was the best option on the roster. Browning starting as a freshman made it hard to recruit ANY quarterback, let alone a dual-threat. That left the cupboards pretty bare post-Browning, and everyone here would have flipped their shit had he started the way more mobile Heinous over Eason. Speaking of Eason, the common understanding is Eason's recruitment led to an overreaction of offering quarterbacks early, hence Morris over Millen.

I think Petersen would have loved to have a quarterback that could pull and keep every once in a while, but what do I know.

Signed Yankoff who is mobile.

They're freshmen dude. Yankoff is future starter here no question. His pin pointdart to Spiker shows his arm. Of course spiker dropped it. He's the future at UW

DoogCourics

whatshouldicareabout said:

Kingdome_Urinals said:

1to392831weretaken said:

haie said:

I heard that Huff hated the offense and encouraging Pete to step down, if he wouldn't give up the offense entirely, was led by Huff, Malloe, and K.

And they all ran a pedophilia ring out of the U Village Joey.

ExtraChrisB said:

...which made Pete's aversion to dual threat guys frustrating.

Maybe it's a morning spent reading Teq's armchair athletic directoring, but the negativity is jumping the shark around here. There is zero evidence that Petersen had an aversion to dual threat quarterbacks. He offered plenty, and none committed. I don't think his offense was one that wanted the quarterback keeping on designed runs a lot, but no coach ever thought to himself, "I'd prefer that my quarterback can't run."

Browning played because he was the best option on the roster. Browning starting as a freshman made it hard to recruit ANY quarterback, let alone a dual-threat. That left the cupboards pretty bare post-Browning, and everyone here would have flipped their shit had he started the way more mobile Heinous over Eason. Speaking of Eason, the common understanding is Eason's recruitment led to an overreaction of offering quarterbacks early, hence Morris over Millen.

I think Petersen would have loved to have a quarterback that could pull and keep every once in a while, but what do I know.

Signed Yankoff who is mobile.

They're freshmen dude. Yankoff is future starter here no question. His pin pointdart to Spiker shows his arm. Of course spiker dropped it. He's the future at UW

I have to disagree. I don’t think Yankoff is the future at UW. Perhaps some place like UCLA, maybe.