Wait a second, I thought you guys wanted doogs here without the dawgman mods to protect them? Then why are you acting like a teenage girl getting her first period when you have gotten your wish?
Are you sure they're not acting like teenage boners hiding in a dark basement without a girlfriend, period? As a wild child of the '50's and '60's who couldn't resist experimenting with everything, I'll never relate.
Nobody in UW HISTORY did less with more than Jim Lambright. Sark, Ty and Gilby all fucking sucked but Lambo years were the most painful years for me as a Husky fan.
Watching one Rose Bowl talented team after another go 7-4 with his fucking deer in the headlights ass was too much to watch.
Nobody in UW HISTORY did less with more than Jim Lambright. Sark, Ty and Gilby all fucking sucked but Lambo years were the most painful years for me as a Husky fan.
Watching one Rose Bowl talented team after another go 7-4 with his fucking deer in the headlights ass was too much to watch.
I actually think Sark might be a better coach. Tough call though. Both are pretty bad.
Longing for the halfbright years…usually with doog baird's cock in your mouth was a favorite past time among doogs on the fagman boreds during the ty/gilby years.
Nobody in UW HISTORY did less with more than Jim Lambright. Sark, Ty and Gilby all fucking sucked but Lambo years were the most painful years for me as a Husky fan.
Watching one Rose Bowl talented team after another go 7-4 with his fucking deer in the headlights ass was too much to watch.
I actually think Sark might be a better coach. Tough call though. Both are pretty bad.
I'd think I'd take Lambo cause he wasn't a total fucking embarrassment like Sark.
However, Sark does win close games while Lambo it seemed like never did.
Both fucking suck ass and I can't believe I wasted three sentences on those two.
Nobody in UW HISTORY did less with more than Jim Lambright. Sark, Ty and Gilby all fucking sucked but Lambo years were the most painful years for me as a Husky fan.
Watching one Rose Bowl talented team after another go 7-4 with his fucking deer in the headlights ass was too much to watch.
I actually think Sark might be a better coach. Tough call though. Both are pretty bad.
I'd think I'd take Lambo cause he wasn't a total fucking embarrassment like Sark.
However, Sark does win close games while Lambo it seemed like never did.
Both fucking suck ass and I can't believe I wasted three sentences on those two.
Sark came in off 0-12....Lambo took over a program strapped by sanctions. Both were a goddamn disgrace. Difference was that Lambo's teams usually played fairly "tuff" while Sark got plungered thrice yearly. Also....Sark is the only coach in UW history to go 0-5 against Oregon.
You aren't anti Doog if you still defend Lambo, pick Sark to win the north, say Sark will win coach of the year at USC and say we should only expect to win 7 in 2014.
You aren't anti Doog if you still defend Lambo, pick Sark to win the north, say Sark will win coach of the year at USC and say we should only expect to win 7 in 2014.
You are the very definition of a Doog.
I'll defend Lamb till I die. And so too will any true dawg you stupid motherfucker.. Did you watch the Huskies during Lambo's tenure? I know, you were watching husky volleyball and Bob Bendover.
I like to claim I never post anything Doogish in one post then post some epic Doog shit in the next post.
I do that.
Anyone who didn't want Lambright fired at the 50 yard line when Wheaton crossed the 50 is a fucking Doog.
OP is kind of dooging it up here already. I've been keeping my mouth shut (pretty much) but a little of Kim's skepticism (LOL!) is warranted for now. Petersen is probably the best of the bunch of ex-BSU coaches, but the record is mixed.
That said, I doubt that this year's recruiting class is going to be very good, given the transition.
Next year should be a cakewalk and might mask real problems. Look at the Oregon/Stanford/Wazzu games and whatever decent opponents you get from the South. That's your 2014 season. The rest is noise.
You aren't anti Doog if you still defend Lambo, pick Sark to win the north, say Sark will win coach of the year at USC and say we should only expect to win 7 in 2014.
You aren't anti Doog if you still defend Lambo, pick Sark to win the north, say Sark will win coach of the year at USC and say we should only expect to win 7 in 2014.
You are the very definition of a Doog.
I'll defend Lamb till I die. And so too will any true dawg you stupid motherfucker.. Did you watch the Huskies during Lambo's tenure? I know, you were watching husky volleyball and Bob Bendover.
I like to claim I never post anything Doogish in one post then post some epic Doog shit in the next post.
I do that.
Anyone who didn't want Lambright fired at the 50 yard line when Huard dropped back to passWheaton crossed the 50 is a fucking Doog.
Comments
Thanks, Lambo
whatever, two Christmases.
Watching one Rose Bowl talented team after another go 7-4 with his fucking deer in the headlights ass was too much to watch.
However, Sark does win close games while Lambo it seemed like never did.
Both fucking suck ass and I can't believe I wasted three sentences on those two.
Lambo was a disaster but still >>>>>>>>>>>>>Sark
Case closed....imo
I do that.
Anyone who didn't want Lambright fired at the 50 yard line when Wheaton crossed the 50 is a fucking Doog.
Lambo is a dumbo. Anyone who says he was a good coach is on crack or just fucking stupid.
That said, I doubt that this year's recruiting class is going to be very good, given the transition.
Next year should be a cakewalk and might mask real problems. Look at the Oregon/Stanford/Wazzu games and whatever decent opponents you get from the South. That's your 2014 season. The rest is noise.