Tevarua Tafiti, 2022 3* LB, Honolulu (Punahou), HI (Offered)
Comments
-
We're already in itBeerThirty said: -
JFC. Spoken like someone who would really know what they're talking about on this matter.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
Burn this thread down. Tafiti wanted Stanford because they are second to none in the academies category and he was notified he got in over the weekend.
Oregon the journalism school can STFU on the topic. -
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread. -
I have degree from uw, that should end all the uw prestige discussionsEdwin_Bambino said:
The people on Dawgman who legitimately try to act like UW is the same level academically as ND, Cal, or Stanford because they saw UW was a top ten university on some bullshit ranking are the absolute worst. UW is a good school, but the doogs think it’s the same tier as an Ivy. Spoiler, it’s not.Doug said:Jesus Fetters you are truly a idiot
-
I love how Fetters makes up an excuse about how Washington not being rated high enough academically is why we suck at recruiting now. Pete had no problem beating Stanford and ND for recruits. We just have a staff that is lazy and sucks at recruiting. It's really that simple.
-
Welcome to the dark side my negasonics1993 said:I love how Fetters makes up an excuse about how Washington not being rated high enough academically is why we suck at recruiting now. Pete had no problem beating Stanford and ND for recruits. We just have a staff that is lazy and sucks at recruiting. It's really that simple.
-
Umm, what alum thinks this? I've never been to dawgman and don't care what they think.Edwin_Bambino said:
The people on Dawgman who legitimately try to act like UW is the same level academically as ND, Cal, or Stanford because they saw UW was a top ten university on some bullshit ranking are the absolute worst. UW is a good school, but the doogs think it’s the same tier as an Ivy. Spoiler, it’s not.Doug said:Jesus Fetters you are truly a idiot
The only ones that I know of that even remotely push this are the ones that spent most of their 4 years in a library and didn't have any fun and stressed balls in some bio/med program the entire time. -
Your field is jizz mopping? Damn, aim higher...chuck said:A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
-
Asa Turnersonics1993 said:I love how Fetters makes up an excuse about how Washington not being rated high enough academically is why we suck at recruiting now. Pete had no problem beating Stanford and ND for recruits. We just have a staff that is lazy and sucks at recruiting. It's really that simple.
Husky legend -
No fucking way?!?!UDubHusky23 said:
We were Morrison's dream school since he was like 8 years old lolDoogerMcFarland said:“I’m closing my recruitment completely; this is the school I wanted and this has been my dream school since freshman year,” Tafiti said.
Stanford has been his dream school for two and a half years. Hard to beat that. -
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree. -
It's true!! He knew what he wanted before he had peach fuzz under his arms, nor was he affected by his big sister's influence.DoogerMcFarland said:
No fucking way?!?!UDubHusky23 said:
We were Morrison's dream school since he was like 8 years old lolDoogerMcFarland said:“I’m closing my recruitment completely; this is the school I wanted and this has been my dream school since freshman year,” Tafiti said.
Stanford has been his dream school for two and a half years. Hard to beat that. -
I'll take the UW degree instead, for a bunch of reasons. If the little Benny's and potatoe people loved their experience, more power to them. I will still make fun of them.chuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
That being said they shouldn't be losing tons of recruits to Stanford like this, and if they do lose a kid then it should be pussy kids like fozzy who are happy to sit on the sidelines and and wash out of the league immediately.
Then again, Tree beats us down on the field too. -
Kyler Gordon and Trent Mcduffie say hiRaceBannon said:
Asa Turnersonics1993 said:I love how Fetters makes up an excuse about how Washington not being rated high enough academically is why we suck at recruiting now. Pete had no problem beating Stanford and ND for recruits. We just have a staff that is lazy and sucks at recruiting. It's really that simple.
Husky legend -
I’m not sure I’d go that far, but the difference in bachelors degrees as stand alone paper between any of the large PNW state schools is marginal, at best.chuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
-
When you've lost Chris Fetters you've lost the war......Edwin_Bambino said:
The people on Dawgman who legitimately try to act like UW is the same level academically as ND, Cal, or Stanford because they saw UW was a top ten university on some bullshit ranking are the absolute worst. UW is a good school, but the doogs think it’s the same tier as an Ivy. Spoiler, it’s not.Doug said:Jesus Fetters you are truly a idiot
When he writes one of these posts or goes deeper into a article in the past it's b/c the natives have become so restless over there to the point they have to address it, or the data is so overwhelming (as in this case) that even Chris has to admit it and find a way to pivot and come up with the most PC pro UW angle he can find.
-
Now you're telling me Jimmy Lake can't evaluate either?RaceBannon said:
Asa Turnersonics1993 said:I love how Fetters makes up an excuse about how Washington not being rated high enough academically is why we suck at recruiting now. Pete had no problem beating Stanford and ND for recruits. We just have a staff that is lazy and sucks at recruiting. It's really that simple.
Husky legend
DOOMED.gif -
Petersen gets credit for anything good Jimmy gets blamed for anything bad
Saw this movie before from butthurt Lambo fans who hated winning the Rose Bowl -
You won't believe the damage Pete did to the program!RaceBannon said:Petersen gets credit for anything good Jimmy gets blamed for anything bad
Saw this movie before from butthurt Lambo fans who hated winning the Rose Bowl -
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA -
No it doesn’t. I work in the accounting industry in downtown Seattle. I was in management for awhile and did hiring (in Seattle and Portland office). Never once did where that degree came from matter. Seriously, think about what you are saying, because that would be fucking stupid. Sorry to bust your bubble. Its about the candidate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA -
I would never hire someone with a UO degree, so, yes, it does matter where a degree comes from.dOgmaster said:
No it doesn’t. I work in the accounting industry in downtown Seattle. I was in management for awhile and did hiring (in Seattle and Portland office). Never once did where that degree came from matter. Seriously, think about what you are saying, because that would be fucking stupid. Sorry to bust your bubble. Its about the candidate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA -
It may matter to you. But I doubt that you would ever be in a position to hire someone. You hire the best candidate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I would never hire someone with a UO degree, so, yes, it does matter where a degree comes from.dOgmaster said:
No it doesn’t. I work in the accounting industry in downtown Seattle. I was in management for awhile and did hiring (in Seattle and Portland office). Never once did where that degree came from matter. Seriously, think about what you are saying, because that would be fucking stupid. Sorry to bust your bubble. Its about the candidate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA
Why are husky fans so sensitive to how the real world works?! So you get a degree and then start thinking like a moron…. Thats a good way to represent uw. -
Next time I post a job opening please do not bother applying.dOgmaster said:
It may matter to you. But I doubt that you would ever be in a position to hire someone. You hire the best candidate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I would never hire someone with a UO degree, so, yes, it does matter where a degree comes from.dOgmaster said:
No it doesn’t. I work in the accounting industry in downtown Seattle. I was in management for awhile and did hiring (in Seattle and Portland office). Never once did where that degree came from matter. Seriously, think about what you are saying, because that would be fucking stupid. Sorry to bust your bubble. Its about the candidate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA
Why are husky fans so sensitive to how the real world works?! So you get a degree and then start thinking like a moron…. Thats a good way to represent uw. -
Its cute that you guys think anyone gets past the first paragraph of a resumedOgmaster said:
It may matter to you. But I doubt that you would ever be in a position to hire someone. You hire the best candidate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I would never hire someone with a UO degree, so, yes, it does matter where a degree comes from.dOgmaster said:
No it doesn’t. I work in the accounting industry in downtown Seattle. I was in management for awhile and did hiring (in Seattle and Portland office). Never once did where that degree came from matter. Seriously, think about what you are saying, because that would be fucking stupid. Sorry to bust your bubble. Its about the candidate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA
Why are husky fans so sensitive to how the real world works?! So you get a degree and then start thinking like a moron…. Thats a good way to represent uw.
-
I agree with your comment but just so we’re both in agreeance on one thing; most duck alums were put on this earth to pump my gas.dOgmaster said:
It may matter to you. But I doubt that you would ever be in a position to hire someone. You hire the best candidate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I would never hire someone with a UO degree, so, yes, it does matter where a degree comes from.dOgmaster said:
No it doesn’t. I work in the accounting industry in downtown Seattle. I was in management for awhile and did hiring (in Seattle and Portland office). Never once did where that degree came from matter. Seriously, think about what you are saying, because that would be fucking stupid. Sorry to bust your bubble. Its about the candidate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA
Why are husky fans so sensitive to how the real world works?! So you get a degree and then start thinking like a moron…. Thats a good way to represent uw. -
I'm sure it does to a small extent depending on the field and locale. In general though? An undergrad degree is treated like a necessary certification to meet basic qualifications and nothing more. When I evaluate candidates I look for it first thing, then I check the box and forget where they got their degree from before I go to the next question.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA
-
I think undergraduates degree matters for the first 2 years. After that it is just what it isdOgmaster said:
No it doesn’t. I work in the accounting industry in downtown Seattle. I was in management for awhile and did hiring (in Seattle and Portland office). Never once did where that degree came from matter. Seriously, think about what you are saying, because that would be fucking stupid. Sorry to bust your bubble. Its about the candidate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This isnt really truechuck said:
And UW will take an athlete with that same 2.0.haie said:
Any high school kid who is serious about their education isn't choosing those schools over UW unless they can't get the money/scholarship to go to UW. Idaho will take you with a fucking 2.0, and beavlet...lol.chuck said:
UW has more than just a solid med school. You're absolutely right about a bachelor's degree being no more valuable than a run of the mill degree from a directional school or branch campus though.dOgmaster said:uw does rank high, but the high ranking is because uw has a very solid medical school, which gets the most $$$ in research grants in the country. But there is nothing unique about a 4-year degree from uw. And I doubt many football players are in the medical program.
A BS or MS from high brow schools like Oregon State, Humboldt State, Colorado State, and even Idaho-Moscow have more prestige in my field than one from UW. No joke. Not that it really matters. Hiring decisions always come down to experience and interviews.
Fuck me for even touching this thread.
You just don't get it. It's not about which school is harder to get into for the general student body. A kid with a 3.9 in HS who goes to the UW degree factory for their BS in biology or journalism or econ has no advantages, none, over a kid who stumbled into Idaho with their 2.5 and got the same degree.
A UW degree carries weight in Seattle and Western WA -
Don't worry, Jimmy's on to this whole negative academic recruiting thing. He won't let any more get away without a fight
-
Fuck me. Am I agreeing with Kim?
