The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has said that the BA.2.86 variant "may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines."
What they aren't gonna tell you is that the more vaccines you've had the more likely you are to get it.
@pawz and I had that one in March 2021. It's on the scoreboard.
Had that from the mrna mice testing back in 2020 when they were first talking about the vaccine. Not sure if I posted that on here to be able to #beatmychest over but it was part of my initial hesitancy over the vaccines and desire to see further testing first.
I believe you. Gert Van den Bosch with Brett Weinstein talking ADE and the crazy logical reasons for not doing mass vaccinations as policy in the middle of a pandemic is what convinced me. Not sure we have full blown ADE going on, but some version of it is clearly happeneing.
GVdB - the VeTeRiNaRiAn - was First and Right, yall.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has said that the BA.2.86 variant "may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines."
What they aren't gonna tell you is that the more vaccines you've had the more likely you are to get it.
@pawz and I had that one in March 2021. It's on the scoreboard.
Had that from the mrna mice testing back in 2020 when they were first talking about the vaccine. Not sure if I posted that on here to be able to #beatmychest over but it was part of my initial hesitancy over the vaccines and desire to see further testing first.
I believe you. Gert Van den Bosch with Brett Weinstein talking ADE and the crazy logical reasons for not doing mass vaccinations as policy in the middle of a pandemic is what convinced me. Not sure we have full blown ADE going on, but some version of it is clearly happeneing.
GVdB - the VeTeRiNaRiAn - was First and Right, yall.
It didn't take credentials to understand basic logical errors and fallacies.
"We did accelerated trials and have no long term trials but trust us this is 100% effective with NO side effects whatsoever!"
If they'd been even slightly more honest it would have been a harder to spot the lie.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has said that the BA.2.86 variant "may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines."
What they aren't gonna tell you is that the more vaccines you've had the more likely you are to get it.
@pawz and I had that one in March 2021. It's on the scoreboard.
Had that from the mrna mice testing back in 2020 when they were first talking about the vaccine. Not sure if I posted that on here to be able to #beatmychest over but it was part of my initial hesitancy over the vaccines and desire to see further testing first.
Researchers analyzed data from 33 state prisons from January to July 2023 to try to assess the effectiveness of the bivalent shots, which were introduced in the fall of 2022.
Among 96,201 inmates with data on COVID-19 testing and vaccination, researchers identified 2,835 cases.
They found that 1,187 of the cases were among people who had received a bivalent vaccine, versus just 568 cases among the unvaccinated.
The rest were among people who received only monovalent, or old vaccines. That group was excluded from further analysis.
While the population of bivalent recipients was higher than the unvaccinated—36,609 compared to 20,889—the rate of infection was still elevated in the bivalent group owing to nearly double the number of infections, the researchers found.
Infection rates in the group that received bivalent shots was 3.2 percent, over the 2.7 percent in the unvaccinated.
“The bivalent-vaccinated group had a slightly but statistically significantly higher infection rate than the unvaccinated group,” Dr. Robert Mayes of the California Correctional Healthcare Services and the other authors wrote.
Stratifying by age, researchers found that the gap was larger in elderly inmates.
Among inmates at least 65 years old, the infection rate was 6.4 percent among the vaccinated and 4.5 percent among those who had not received a shot. Among inmates at least 50 years old, the rates were 4 percent and 3 percent, respectively.
The former was not statistically significant, researchers said.
“Further research is needed to understand the reasons behind these findings and to consider other factors, such as underlying health conditions. This study underscores the importance of developing vaccines that target residual COVID-19 infections, especially in regard to evolving COVID-19 variants,” the researchers added later.
The study was published by the Cureus journal.
The group’s corresponding author did not respond to questions, including why they excluded vaccinated people who have not received a bivalent shot.
The group posited that the gap between the vaccinated and unvaccinated may stem from natural immunity or the protection people have after recovering from COVID-19.
So guys, it been over a hundred pages of comments on masks and vivid and the like. Don’t you think it’s time to move on ? I’m kind worried this is the new free coinage of silver issue
So guys gays, it been over a hundred pages of comments on masks and vivid and the like. Don’t you think it’s time to move on ? I’m kind worried this is the new free coinage of silver issue
So guys, it been over a hundred pages of comments on masks and vivid and the like. Don’t you think it’s time to move on ? I’m kind worried this is the new free coinage of silver issue
So guys, it been over a hundred pages of comments on masks and vivid and the like. Don’t you think it’s time to move on ? I’m kind worried this is the new free coinage of silver issue
As we? say, fuck off Dani you fucking libcunt whore.
So guys, it been over a hundred pages of comments on masks and vivid and the like. Don’t you think it’s time to move on ? I’m kind worried this is the new free coinage of silver issue
Yeah, when people in this very forum cried for the unvaxed to be denied healthcare, not letting people off that easy.
Comments
"We did accelerated trials and have no long term trials but trust us this is 100% effective with NO side effects whatsoever!"
If they'd been even slightly more honest it would have been a harder to spot the lie.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_frequencies_in_the_United_States
After the Big Guy's 10% cut.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/boosted-people-more-likely-unvaccinated-be-infected-new-study-finds
Researchers analyzed data from 33 state prisons from January to July 2023 to try to assess the effectiveness of the bivalent shots, which were introduced in the fall of 2022.
Among 96,201 inmates with data on COVID-19 testing and vaccination, researchers identified 2,835 cases.
They found that 1,187 of the cases were among people who had received a bivalent vaccine, versus just 568 cases among the unvaccinated.
The rest were among people who received only monovalent, or old vaccines. That group was excluded from further analysis.
While the population of bivalent recipients was higher than the unvaccinated—36,609 compared to 20,889—the rate of infection was still elevated in the bivalent group owing to nearly double the number of infections, the researchers found.
Infection rates in the group that received bivalent shots was 3.2 percent, over the 2.7 percent in the unvaccinated.
“The bivalent-vaccinated group had a slightly but statistically significantly higher infection rate than the unvaccinated group,” Dr. Robert Mayes of the California Correctional Healthcare Services and the other authors wrote.
Stratifying by age, researchers found that the gap was larger in elderly inmates.
Among inmates at least 65 years old, the infection rate was 6.4 percent among the vaccinated and 4.5 percent among those who had not received a shot. Among inmates at least 50 years old, the rates were 4 percent and 3 percent, respectively.
The former was not statistically significant, researchers said.
“Further research is needed to understand the reasons behind these findings and to consider other factors, such as underlying health conditions. This study underscores the importance of developing vaccines that target residual COVID-19 infections, especially in regard to evolving COVID-19 variants,” the researchers added later.
The study was published by the Cureus journal.
The group’s corresponding author did not respond to questions, including why they excluded vaccinated people who have not received a bivalent shot.
The group posited that the gap between the vaccinated and unvaccinated may stem from natural immunity or the protection people have after recovering from COVID-19.
? I’m kind worried this is the new free coinage of silver issue