Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Show your support for what this community means to you:
Choose a Donation Amount
Username
(required for credit)
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 40,167
Swaye's Wigwam Solar Eclipse Donator 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes
edited April 2020 in Tug Tavern
Game time fuckers.



edit: Making it the official game thread and pinning so you can get all your piles of plague bodies updates throughout this week of ULTIMATE DEATH!
GrundleStiltzkinRaceBannonBad_MotherDuckerDawgtonaramenduckcreepycougFire_Marshall_BillDude61LesGrossmanpawzRoadTripDooglesSledogSECDAWGCFetters_Nacho_LoverPitchfork51Fenderbender123UWerentThereManLebamDawg
«134567440

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,718
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes Ninth Anniversary
    edited April 2020
    Officials stats* get posted at 4PM.

    *as adjusted by the AAU scorekeepers.
    SwayeCFetters_Nacho_LoverPitchfork51
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,130
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 25000 Comments
    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 15,190
    10000 Comments 1,500 Up Votes 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    RaceBannonMikeDamonepawzRoadTripSledogPitchfork51
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 15,190
    10000 Comments 1,500 Up Votes 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    MikeDamonepawzTurdBomberRoadTripPitchfork51
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 15,190
    10000 Comments 1,500 Up Votes 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    MikeDamonepawzRoadTripSledogPitchfork51CFetters_Nacho_Loverhardhat
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 86,434
    Swaye's Wigwam 50000 Comments 10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    MikeDamonePitchfork51
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 15,190
    10000 Comments 1,500 Up Votes 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    Fire_Marshall_BillhaieSoutherndawgTurdBomberPitchfork51MikeDamone
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,241
    Swaye's Wigwam 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes Eighth Anniversary
    There’s definitely context things going around in the data reporting. The death output seems to be worst case and then when it comes in less, social distancing is being lauded. I seem to recall a time where the deaths that were being projected were with the social distancing assumption built in, so that can’t be the reason for variance in actuals.

    Part of the issue is too many models with wildly different assumptions and reporting taking pieces from each as if it were an integrated model.
    LesGrossmanRaceBannonPitchfork51
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 19,708
    Standard Supporter 10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes Ninth Anniversary
    Andrew Combover and Bill Deblah are heroes now, despite bad orange man. They flattened the curve thanks to their brilliance. Never mind that Deblasio said everything was normal well into March.
    KaepskneeRaceBannonCFetters_Nacho_Loverhardhat
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,395
    Butler Cabin Supporter Ninth Anniversary 2,500 Awesomes 1,500 Up Votes
    I find this chart interesting and the commentary describing it interesting. This is probably something the news should pick up on but it doesn't fit their narrative. "Deaths show by date of onset."


  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member Posts: 4,583
    Tenth Anniversary Standard Supporter 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    What do you have to lose? I may try it, I’ll have to talk to my doctor.
    HHusky
Sign In or Register to comment.