Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!









Show your support for what this community means to you:
Choose a Donation Amount
Username
(required for credit)
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

SwayeSwaye Posts: 34,611
Swaye's Wigwam Solar Eclipse Donator 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes
edited April 6 in Tug Tavern
Game time fuckers.



edit: Making it the official game thread and pinning so you can get all your piles of plague bodies updates throughout this week of ULTIMATE DEATH!
GrundleStiltzkinRaceBannonBad_MotherDuckerDawgtonaramenduckcreepycougFire_Marshall_BillDude61LesGrossmanLebamDawgpawzRoadTripDooglesSledogSECDAWGCFetters_Nacho_LoverPitchfork51Fenderbender123
«13456741

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Posts: 23,566
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes 10000 Comments
    edited April 6
    Officials stats* get posted at 4PM.

    *as adjusted by the AAU scorekeepers.
    SwayeCFetters_Nacho_LoverPitchfork51
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Posts: 22,062
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments
    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover
  • HHuskyHHusky Posts: 7,908
    5000 Comments 1,000 Up Votes 250 Answers 250 Awesomes

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    RaceBannonMikeDamonepawzRoadTripSledogPitchfork51
  • HHuskyHHusky Posts: 7,908
    5000 Comments 1,000 Up Votes 250 Answers 250 Awesomes

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    MikeDamonepawzTurdBomberRoadTripPitchfork51
  • HHuskyHHusky Posts: 7,908
    5000 Comments 1,000 Up Votes 250 Answers 250 Awesomes

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    MikeDamonepawzRoadTripSledogPitchfork51CFetters_Nacho_Lover
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 61,402
    Swaye's Wigwam 50000 Comments 10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    MikeDamonePitchfork51
  • HHuskyHHusky Posts: 7,908
    5000 Comments 1,000 Up Votes 250 Answers 250 Awesomes

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    Fire_Marshall_BillhaieMikeDamoneSoutherndawgTurdBomberPitchfork51
  • Bob_CBob_C Posts: 710
    250 Answers Sixth Anniversary 500 Awesomes 500 Comments
    There’s definitely context things going around in the data reporting. The death output seems to be worst case and then when it comes in less, social distancing is being lauded. I seem to recall a time where the deaths that were being projected were with the social distancing assumption built in, so that can’t be the reason for variance in actuals.

    Part of the issue is too many models with wildly different assumptions and reporting taking pieces from each as if it were an integrated model.
    LesGrossmanRaceBannonPitchfork51
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Posts: 14,947
    Standard Supporter 10,000 Up Votes 5,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments
    Andrew Combover and Bill Deblah are heroes now, despite bad orange man. They flattened the curve thanks to their brilliance. Never mind that Deblasio said everything was normal well into March.
    KaepskneeRaceBannonCFetters_Nacho_Lover
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Posts: 1,676
    Seventh Anniversary 1,500 Awesomes 1,000 Up Votes 250 Answers
    I find this chart interesting and the commentary describing it interesting. This is probably something the news should pick up on but it doesn't fit their narrative. "Deaths show by date of onset."


  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Posts: 2,479
    2,500 Up Votes 2,500 Awesomes Seventh Anniversary 250 Answers
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

    Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

    What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
    Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

    I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
    So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
    I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
    So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
    Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?
    What do you have to lose? I may try it, I’ll have to talk to my doctor.
    HHusky
Sign In or Register to comment.