Why we need the 2A
Comments
-
Missed this tidbit!MikeDamone said:
Already did. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll have my Ruger 9mm in 8 more days. I have my shotgun in hand. Working on getting an AR15 as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Get to the store. They are still an essential bidness.MikeDamone said:
This is a hill i would die on. No crime, no warrant. Kiss my ass. We have a problem.YellowSnow said:
Gay. Fight for your rights.MikeDamone said:
They come to my house and ask for ID. I ask for what and they say to verify my residence. I tell them they need a warrant. They disagree. I say come back with a warrant or leave. They drag me off.ThomasFremont said:
I’m still waiting for the reason this would happen. This is your hypothetical fantasy, not mine.Sledog said:
No answers, I thought so.ThomasFremont said:
Why would that happen?Sledog said:
What if they come to where you are too drag you off? You have all the answers.ThomasFremont said:
So, no?YellowSnow said:
Damone doesn't own guns.ThomasFremont said:
Just to be clear, shooting them is still on the table?MikeDamone said:
I don’t live in RI. If I did they wouldn’t get my info without a warrant. Then we’d go from there.ThomasFremont said:So, you’re gonna shoot them?
Damone no longer has no guns. Thanks Trump.
Fuck off -
Trying to get my head wrapped around this. “We will be targeting those homes where people have come from New York”...MikeDamone said:
And high capacity magazines.
R.I. National Guard will be going door-to-door in seaside communities looking for New Yorkers, collecting their personal information and ordering them to quarantine.
“We will be targeting those homes where people have come from New York,” she said.
https://www.wpri.com/health/coronavirus/march-27-ri-coronavirus-update/
2A protects 4A
Is that for Coronavirus or Guns???
-
With my Wilbur Hooks HandWilburHooksHands said:
how are you typing???MikeDamone said:
I have my shotgun in hand. -
Obviously the virus as guns aren't allowed in New York. Not America!SECDAWG said:
Trying to get my head wrapped around this. “We will be targeting those homes where people have come from New York”...MikeDamone said:
And high capacity magazines.
R.I. National Guard will be going door-to-door in seaside communities looking for New Yorkers, collecting their personal information and ordering them to quarantine.
“We will be targeting those homes where people have come from New York,” she said.
https://www.wpri.com/health/coronavirus/march-27-ri-coronavirus-update/
2A protects 4A
Is that for Coronavirus or Guns??? -
It’s a song lyric, and relevant to the discussion of guns. Try to follow along. This is why I started a new thread..,MikeDamone said:
So your strap comment was so above board. Go fuck yourself.ThomasFremont said:
Weird non-sequitor.MikeDamone said:
That would be sometime before I had a meltdown on a football message over my family members in the military who were going to die because trump killed a terrorist. That was an awesome bitch evening you had there.ThomasFremont said:
When during that conversation do you pull out your strap and lay them bustas down?MikeDamone said:
They come to my house and ask for ID. I ask for what and they say to verify my residence. I tell them they need a warrant. They disagree. I say come back with a warrant or leave. They drag me off.ThomasFremont said:
I’m still waiting for the reason this would happen. This is your hypothetical fantasy, not mine.Sledog said:
No answers, I thought so.ThomasFremont said:
Why would that happen?Sledog said:
What if they come to where you are too drag you off? You have all the answers.ThomasFremont said:
So, no?YellowSnow said:
Damone doesn't own guns.ThomasFremont said:
Just to be clear, shooting them is still on the table?MikeDamone said:
I don’t live in RI. If I did they wouldn’t get my info without a warrant. Then we’d go from there.ThomasFremont said:So, you’re gonna shoot them?
Playing the Bob playbook is beneath you. Allegedly.
We have a constitution and a process. I'd plan to follow. If others choose not to that's their issue -
Here we go......ThomasFremont said:
It’s a song lyric, and relevant to the discussion of guns. Try to follow along. This is why I started a new thread..,MikeDamone said:
So your strap comment was so above board. Go fuck yourself.ThomasFremont said:
Weird non-sequitor.MikeDamone said:
That would be sometime before I had a meltdown on a football message over my family members in the military who were going to die because trump killed a terrorist. That was an awesome bitch evening you had there.ThomasFremont said:
When during that conversation do you pull out your strap and lay them bustas down?MikeDamone said:
They come to my house and ask for ID. I ask for what and they say to verify my residence. I tell them they need a warrant. They disagree. I say come back with a warrant or leave. They drag me off.ThomasFremont said:
I’m still waiting for the reason this would happen. This is your hypothetical fantasy, not mine.Sledog said:
No answers, I thought so.ThomasFremont said:
Why would that happen?Sledog said:
What if they come to where you are too drag you off? You have all the answers.ThomasFremont said:
So, no?YellowSnow said:
Damone doesn't own guns.ThomasFremont said:
Just to be clear, shooting them is still on the table?MikeDamone said:
I don’t live in RI. If I did they wouldn’t get my info without a warrant. Then we’d go from there.ThomasFremont said:So, you’re gonna shoot them?
Playing the Bob playbook is beneath you. Allegedly.
We have a constitution and a process. I'd plan to follow. If others choose not to that's their issue -
Whole lot of new 2A supporters after this.
My guns are for the mob right now. I've already lived through 2 riots.
Last I checked we still do have rule of law. Not yet time for armed insurgency and shooting it out with the police.
-
I've been to one riot and was out for round two but they chickened out.UW_Doog_Bot said:Whole lot of new 2A supporters after this.
My guns are for the mob right now. I've already lived through 2 riots.
Last I checked we still do have rule of law. Not yet time for armed insurgency and shooting it out with the police.
Not many worries where I'm at. Unless there's no food.... -
This. Guns are for bad guysm who intend to do you harm and the cops can't help you in the moment and/or the mob. And we can all agree that they are just damn cool and fun to shoot at stuff.UW_Doog_Bot said:Whole lot of new 2A supporters after this.
My guns are for the mob right now. I've already lived through 2 riots.
Last I checked we still do have rule of law. Not yet time for armed insurgency and shooting it out with the police. -
That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
We didn’t have end times in 1918- 19. I don’t think we’ll get there.GrundleStiltzkin said:
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
I think you’re more out in the cuntry than me, Pod.GrundleStiltzkin said:
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
Except when law enforcement becomes the bad guysYellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
Mike D will swarm on any mother fucker in a blue uniform.MikeDamone said:
Except when law enforcement becomes the bad guysYellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=c5fts7bj-so -
That could never happen in the US.MikeDamone said:
Except when law enforcement becomes the bad guysYellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
Except also #blacklivesmatter.
And Trump is Hitler.
And the Russians hacked our election. -
I’ve been distancing before it was cool.YellowSnow said:
I think you’re more out in the cuntry than me, Pod.GrundleStiltzkin said:
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
That’s what I hear.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I’ve been distancing before it was cool.YellowSnow said:
I think you’re more out in the cuntry than me, Pod.GrundleStiltzkin said:
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
Only if they violate the 4th amendmentYellowSnow said:
Mike D will swarm on any mother fucker in a blue uniform.MikeDamone said:
Except when law enforcement becomes the bad guysYellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=c5fts7bj-so -
I’ve continued to go to office, Inslee can take the keys from my cold dead hands. However, at home, we literally don’t see another soul.YellowSnow said:
That’s what I hear.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I’ve been distancing before it was cool.YellowSnow said:
I think you’re more out in the cuntry than me, Pod.GrundleStiltzkin said:
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
Well Snow - you don't see the need for a ban on AR-15 but damn near everyone of it seemed like dozens of the dem candidates for President did. I'll agree, at this time it's more likely that a cop will need an AR-15 against the bad guys. But things happen -
-
about 4 PM every day the pup growls at someone jogging on the road. we see but do not communicate. They are still 250 feet away.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I’ve continued to go to office, Inslee can take the keys from my cold dead hands. However, at home, we literally don’t see another soul.YellowSnow said:
That’s what I hear.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I’ve been distancing before it was cool.YellowSnow said:
I think you’re more out in the cuntry than me, Pod.GrundleStiltzkin said:
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
There have been several home invasions recently where a so called assault weapon won the day for the resident.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
If the cops need 63 rounds to drop a bad guy in a gunfight my wife might need 63 rounds.
The AR might be needed against the government if it ever came to that. The 2A isn't just about self defense from crooks. -
Urban myth with proper ammo. An AR can have less penetration in common building materials than say a 9MM.GrundleStiltzkin said:
For non COVID end times home defense, I would not use my AR. Good chance of shooting some in the next room, or house for that matter. Now, shooting from the house outward, that’s a different story.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
-
Not saying there can’t be a scenario where an AR could say you’re life. It’s just statistically very, very rare. I could get killed my lightning too or die in a firey plane crash. I don’t worry about it.Sledog said:
There have been several home invasions recently where a so called assault weapon won the day for the resident.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
If the cops need 63 rounds to drop a bad guy in a gunfight my wife might need 63 rounds.
The AR might be needed against the government if it ever came to that. The 2A isn't just about self defense from crooks.
When it comes to fighting back against low level tyranny we’re better off relying upon the legal system and the electoral process.
How’d armed insurrection against perceived tyranny work out for the South? -
If it came to that, quite honestly, it's the politicians who should be worried. The insurrection would be with the military and law enforcement offers taking them out.YellowSnow said:
Not saying there can’t be a scenario where an AR could say you’re life. It’s just statistically very, very rare. I could get killed my lightning too or die in a firey plane crash. I don’t worry about it.Sledog said:
There have been several home invasions recently where a so called assault weapon won the day for the resident.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
If the cops need 63 rounds to drop a bad guy in a gunfight my wife might need 63 rounds.
The AR might be needed against the government if it ever came to that. The 2A isn't just about self defense from crooks.
When it comes to fighting back against low level tyranny we’re better off relying upon the legal system and the electoral process.
How’d armed insurrection against perceived tyranny work out for the South?
I can't speak for the former warriors like @Swaye and @USMChawk but I would have a hard time believing guys cut from the same cloth would fire on their own citizens. They would refuse to obey the order.
I can say with almost absolute certainty, at least in my neck of the woods, the local law enforcement officers would say "fuck no" to anything of that nature.
-
Exactly. The people in the military who would have to back a tyranny aren’t exactly left wing radicals.PurpleThrobber said:
If it came to that, quite honestly, it's the politicians who should be worried. The insurrection would be with the military and law enforcement offers taking them out.YellowSnow said:
Not saying there can’t be a scenario where an AR could say you’re life. It’s just statistically very, very rare. I could get killed my lightning too or die in a firey plane crash. I don’t worry about it.Sledog said:
There have been several home invasions recently where a so called assault weapon won the day for the resident.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
If the cops need 63 rounds to drop a bad guy in a gunfight my wife might need 63 rounds.
The AR might be needed against the government if it ever came to that. The 2A isn't just about self defense from crooks.
When it comes to fighting back against low level tyranny we’re better off relying upon the legal system and the electoral process.
How’d armed insurrection against perceived tyranny work out for the South?
I can't speak for the former warriors like @Swaye and @USMChawk but I would have a hard time believing guys cut from the same cloth would fire on their own citizens. They would refuse to obey the order.
I can say with almost absolute certainty, at least in my neck of the woods, the local law enforcement officers would say "fuck no" to anything of that nature. -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2018/04/30/that-time-the-cdc-asked-about-defensive-gun-uses/amp/YellowSnow said:
Not saying there can’t be a scenario where an AR could say you’re life. It’s just statistically very, very rare. I could get killed my lightning too or die in a firey plane crash. I don’t worry about it.Sledog said:
There have been several home invasions recently where a so called assault weapon won the day for the resident.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
If the cops need 63 rounds to drop a bad guy in a gunfight my wife might need 63 rounds.
The AR might be needed against the government if it ever came to that. The 2A isn't just about self defense from crooks.
When it comes to fighting back against low level tyranny we’re better off relying upon the legal system and the electoral process.
How’d armed insurrection against perceived tyranny work out for the South?
-
Agree. It wouldn't be the citizens fighting the military. It would be citizens and military fighting what's left of the militaryPurpleThrobber said:
If it came to that, quite honestly, it's the politicians who should be worried. The insurrection would be with the military and law enforcement offers taking them out.YellowSnow said:
Not saying there can’t be a scenario where an AR could say you’re life. It’s just statistically very, very rare. I could get killed my lightning too or die in a firey plane crash. I don’t worry about it.Sledog said:
There have been several home invasions recently where a so called assault weapon won the day for the resident.YellowSnow said:
I don’t favor any sort of AR ban. Plus they are fun as hell to shoot at beer cans (you can’t miss). But the the scenarios where law enforcement might actually need to use one in a shoot out with bad guys are far more probable than the average civilian for home defense.WestlinnDuck said:That's what pisses me of about lying leftards and the 2A. They want to keep talking about hunting and why I don't need an AR-15 to protect myself. The police sure seem to think they need an AR-15 to protect themselves and they are the supposed professionals.
If the cops need 63 rounds to drop a bad guy in a gunfight my wife might need 63 rounds.
The AR might be needed against the government if it ever came to that. The 2A isn't just about self defense from crooks.
When it comes to fighting back against low level tyranny we’re better off relying upon the legal system and the electoral process.
How’d armed insurrection against perceived tyranny work out for the South?
I can't speak for the former warriors like @Swaye and @USMChawk but I would have a hard time believing guys cut from the same cloth would fire on their own citizens. They would refuse to obey the order.
I can say with almost absolute certainty, at least in my neck of the woods, the local law enforcement officers would say "fuck no" to anything of that nature.
