Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
Do you think all of the inclusions in Pelosi’s bill will make it to the final draft? I certainly don’t. My opinion was this was an initial foray for her and then they meet in the middle because yes, many of the provisions are a little silly
in the final draft - no, easily added into the final version after those bastards approve the draft. Then it gets it final tweaks (meaning add stuff back in) then gets entered into the record.
Final tweaks is the technical term for final edits.
The issue is while they're haggling all this out people are losing jobs.
It's not the time for politics as usual. It's the time for Congress to do their jobs and prioritize the nation above their party.
Clearly they have no idea how to do that.
Actually, they did have an idea on how to do that. They had a bill that was negotiated by both parties in the Senate that was ready for passage Sunday night. Pelosi and the Rats blew up that deal in order push a raft of left-wing bullshit like more tax credits for wind and solar. Instead of focusing your blame and anger at the people who are causing this delay you've decided that taking a "both sides do it" approach makes you appear thoughtful and above it all.
Yeah, I don't have any doubts that the GOP tried to slide some dirty shit in.
But don't try and take the moral high ground while simultaneously sliding more dirty shit into your version.
Both sides need to DIAFF.
Always love the pox on both their houses responses. People think this makes them look wise and non-partisan.
You're free to cite the "dirty shit" the GOP put into the bill. The bullshit about the "slush fund" is no longer operative.
I never said shit about a slush fund.
If you don't think the GOP tried to slide something in there that isn't applicable you're pretty gullible. Of course they did.
And Nancy went above and beyond over the top in response. What she did was worse, I'm not arguing otherwise.
Both sides suck. That has shit to do with looking wise and non partisan. That's called having common sense.
What I think is that you've got a talking point but no evidence in support of it. I'll wait here while you look for something the GOP put into this bill that comes close to even approximating requiring racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.
I said what Nancy did was worse. I'm not arguing the GOP had anything that comes close to approximating it.
This is almost always the reality dnc and the msm media refuses to report this. Just accepting it and saying both sides need to diaff doesn't do anything to shed light on the real issues.
The McConnell GOP has played very dirty on a number of occasions. The SCOTUS seat is the most notable example. I'm thrilled there's another pro life judge because of it but you don't pull something that dirty without the other side screwing you over in return. Retribution is coming. The GOP's dirtiness absolutely part of the problem.
It's not just a democratic issue.
Both sides suck and we need a viable third (and hopefully fourth) party in this nation yesterday.
Here's where I would say Mellodawg's analysis fits. Was it dirty? Yes but people's lives were not literally on the line as is the case right now. Elections in normal times have consequesnces and the Senate belonged to the GOP when we had a shitty progressive president trying to remake the country in his image.
Comments
Final tweaks is the technical term for final edits.
It's not the time for politics as usual. It's the time for Congress to do their jobs and prioritize the nation above their party.
Clearly they have no idea how to do that.
On both sides.