Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Noted conservative heard from

13

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited March 2020

    HHusky said:

    Sorry to have upset you ladies.

    Even those of us who identified as Republicans at the time knew GHWB's "most qualified" candidate line was a whopper.

    Noted sexist, too.

    I'm hearing sexism is worse than racism nowadays

    Professor Hill? That you?
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited March 2020

    I think that the dem and RINO adoption of open borders led to Trump's victory. At the core, if you can't support America First policies then you are vulnerable to a candidate that unapologetically does. I think Rubio would have been the republican nominee if he hadn't decided to be Schumer's little bitch and swallow for open borders. Amnesty now and closed border later worked once with Reagan and it was clear that Schumer had no interest in closing the border at some unidentified later date. Not sure that open borders Rubio would have won over the key states that Trump won.

    The Dems push for illegals is the dumbest political move in history.

    Even the wokest of the woke doesn't truly believe in it beyond sticking it to the right.

    Normal people sure as fuck are turned off by it.

    No more asylum = no more cages. Case closed
    I don't know who you surround yourself with, but the woke suburban liberals who infest my Facebook feed are absolutely in favor of illegals and they see it as a human rights issue, with Trump as the internment camp warden.
    Woke suburban liberals have no skin in game and have more to gain by moral grandstanding and virtue signaling with their other white guilt ridden emotional dumb shits than they do by thinking critically and rationally.
    I’m on the front line with these dip shits everyday. Some are close frens.
    You’re on the front lines with woke dip shit suburban liberals?
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    HHusky claiming the black man wasn’t REALLY qualified. He was. You’re angry that a black man broke ranks. Typical leftist.
    You girls hate affirmative action, except when you don't.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    And Obama doesn’t get into Columbia or Harvard Law or get elected to senate or the Presidency without being black.
    I don't know whether Obama gets into Columbia or Harvard, but I don't think he gets to coast to the nomination in 2008 without being black. I doubt he gets the nomination at all in 2008 without being black. As you know, I've said that before. PT thinks that's a racist opinion, btw. Apparently you're a racist too in his book.

    If his grades and test scores were really good enough to get in do you really think he would have fought like hell to not release them?

    He admits he benefited from AA, Michelle is the one in denial thinking she got in due to merit.

  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    HHusky claiming the black man wasn’t REALLY qualified. He was. You’re angry that a black man broke ranks. Typical leftist.
    You girls hate affirmative action, except when you don't.
    His nomination wasn’t affirmative action. HTH.

    Are you still forced to suck your dads cock? Seems like it.
    Forced?
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    HHusky claiming the black man wasn’t REALLY qualified. He was. You’re angry that a black man broke ranks. Typical leftist.
    You girls hate affirmative action, except when you don't.
    His nomination wasn’t affirmative action. HTH.

    Are you still forced to suck your dads cock? Seems like it.
    Forced?
    Good point. He enthusiastically worked the balls. He’s daddy is proud.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    And Obama doesn’t get into Columbia or Harvard Law or get elected to senate or the Presidency without being black.
    I don't know whether Obama gets into Columbia or Harvard, but I don't think he gets to coast to the nomination in 2008 without being black. I doubt he gets the nomination at all in 2008 without being black. As you know, I've said that before. PT thinks that's a racist opinion, btw. Apparently you're a racist too in his book.

    If his grades and test scores were really good enough to get in do you really think he would have fought like hell to not release them?

    He admits he benefited from AA, Michelle is the one in denial thinking she got in due to merit.

    And Thomas admits the same. I suspect, without knowing for sure, that Obama got into some schools based on AA. Again, I can't really blame them for taking what was offered.

    But you and I agree Obama wouldn't have been elected President but for his being black--his resume wouldn't have gotten him the nomination. Neither would Thomas's resume have gotten him a nomination to the SC.

  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    And Obama doesn’t get into Columbia or Harvard Law or get elected to senate or the Presidency without being black.
    I don't know whether Obama gets into Columbia or Harvard, but I don't think he gets to coast to the nomination in 2008 without being black. I doubt he gets the nomination at all in 2008 without being black. As you know, I've said that before. PT thinks that's a racist opinion, btw. Apparently you're a racist too in his book.

    If his grades and test scores were really good enough to get in do you really think he would have fought like hell to not release them?

    He admits he benefited from AA, Michelle is the one in denial thinking she got in due to merit.

    And Thomas admits the same. I suspect, without knowing for sure, that Obama got into some schools based on AA. Again, I can't really blame them for taking what was offered.

    But you and I agree Obama wouldn't have been elected President but for his being black--his resume wouldn't have gotten him the nomination. Neither would Thomas's resume have gotten him a nomination to the SC.

    Do you swallow your daddy’s cum? Or spit ?
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    HHusky claiming the black man wasn’t REALLY qualified. He was. You’re angry that a black man broke ranks. Typical leftist.
    You girls hate affirmative action, except when you don't.
    His nomination wasn’t affirmative action. HTH.

    Are you still forced to suck your dads cock? Seems like it.

    HH is made a black conservative exists and is qualified to be on the Supreme Court. Typical racist. The facts are in. He made correct decisions for 25 years. And leftists are pissed.

    Look lady, he got nominated by Bush because he's black. He wasn't the most qualified candidate. That's affirmative action.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Honest question O’Keefed, if Thomas had the exact same resume and qualifications but was a reliable liberal vote, would you and the rest of your leftist pals be so dismissive of him?

    And would he be as vilified in the MSM and pop culture or would he get the RBG cocksuck treatment?
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    O’Keefed, identity for us the most recent SC nominee who really was the most qualified candidate.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    HHusky claiming the black man wasn’t REALLY qualified. He was. You’re angry that a black man broke ranks. Typical leftist.
    You girls hate affirmative action, except when you don't.
    His nomination wasn’t affirmative action. HTH.

    Are you still forced to suck your dads cock? Seems like it.

    HH is made a black conservative exists and is qualified to be on the Supreme Court. Typical racist. The facts are in. He made correct decisions for 25 years. And leftists are pissed.

    Look lady, he got nominated by Bush because he's black. He wasn't the most qualified candidate. That's affirmative action.
    He was qualified. You say he was’t because he offends your leftist sensibilities. Simple fact. You’re exposed as a racist daddy cock sucker.


    Did yiu ask your daddy to at least shave the shaft?
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Just like Clarence Thomas is airbrushed out of famous black historical figures. It's all about the Vag or skin color as long as you are a leftard. Then it isn't.

    The fact that Thomas isn’t celebrated as an example of what people can achieve in this country is sad. He’s doesn’t fit the victim narrative that the left rallies around and he’s a threat to them. Imagine an successful black man who didn’t accept the narrative peddled by the race hustlers being seen and an enemy.

    He pisses off HHusky
    Clearly among the most qualified Republican, black lawyers of that era. I never claimed otherwise.
    Why would you need to put a disclaimer of his race?

    He is one of the most acclaimed lawyers. Period.

    Why would I omit the qualification most responsible for his nomination?
    That comment is straight Ross Barnett/Robert Byrd shit. Kudos for kicking it back to old school plantation Southern Democrat thinking.


    So you really don't have any go to move but to scream "Racist!".

    Clarence Thomas isn't nominated to the Supreme Court without being black. He wasn't a terrible candidate and the reasons for his nomination aren't his fault, but let's try to remain somewhat grounded in reality.
    HHusky claiming the black man wasn’t REALLY qualified. He was. You’re angry that a black man broke ranks. Typical leftist.
    You girls hate affirmative action, except when you don't.
    His nomination wasn’t affirmative action. HTH.

    Are you still forced to suck your dads cock? Seems like it.

    HH is made a black conservative exists and is qualified to be on the Supreme Court. Typical racist. The facts are in. He made correct decisions for 25 years. And leftists are pissed.

    Look lady, he got nominated by Bush because he's black. He wasn't the most qualified candidate. That's affirmative action.
    He was qualified. You say he was’t because he offends your leftist sensibilities. Simple fact. You’re exposed as a racist daddy cock sucker.


    Did yiu ask your daddy to at least shave the shaft?
    His performance on the SC shows he was qualified, O’Keefed, who loves to criticize semantics is butt hurt because Bush used some puffery to call him the most qualified.

    O’Keefed doesn’t believe that to be true in part because he is black
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,276
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    I’m sorry you hens are getting so worked up. That can be the only explanation for arguing with me about things I haven’t said, or trying to persuade me to defend things said by others.

    I’ve never said Thomas was unqualified. He was minimally qualified in my opinion and in the opinions of others at the time. I simply said he wouldn’t have been nominated if he wasn’t black. That was so obvious at the time that even conservatives could acknowledge it amongst themselves, and we did. But again, you’re not conservatives. You’re the rabble.

  • Options
    SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    Damone is skrong in this thread.

    H, just


  • Options
    YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 34,044
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam

    I think that the dem and RINO adoption of open borders led to Trump's victory. At the core, if you can't support America First policies then you are vulnerable to a candidate that unapologetically does. I think Rubio would have been the republican nominee if he hadn't decided to be Schumer's little bitch and swallow for open borders. Amnesty now and closed border later worked once with Reagan and it was clear that Schumer had no interest in closing the border at some unidentified later date. Not sure that open borders Rubio would have won over the key states that Trump won.

    The Dems push for illegals is the dumbest political move in history.

    Even the wokest of the woke doesn't truly believe in it beyond sticking it to the right.

    Normal people sure as fuck are turned off by it.

    No more asylum = no more cages. Case closed
    I don't know who you surround yourself with, but the woke suburban liberals who infest my Facebook feed are absolutely in favor of illegals and they see it as a human rights issue, with Trump as the internment camp warden.
    Woke suburban liberals have no skin in game and have more to gain by moral grandstanding and virtue signaling with their other white guilt ridden emotional dumb shits than they do by thinking critically and rationally.
    I’m on the front line with these dip shits everyday. Some are close frens.
    You’re on the front lines with woke dip shit suburban liberals?
    My bad. I am a homeowner in the big city, not the burbs. I argue with the rich and woke Seattle liberal dipshits every week. Same difference.
Sign In or Register to comment.