First Coranovirus Death in WA State
Comments
-
You never know when they'll turn into zombies!UWerentThereMan said:
Bullets can also be exchanged for good and servicesSledog said:Better to stock up early!
-
Nope.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
-
If you get this virus you are much more likely to die from it than if you get the flu. It also has a much higher transmission rate than the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
People are confusing the case-fatality rate and the mortality rate, which are not the same thing.pawz said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.MikeDamone said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.PurpleThrobber said:
You should look at the global population and use the term 'Mortality Rate' properly.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You should look at overall statistics and not cherry pick data from the US where the virus is just starting to emerge.PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Mortality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Population
Case Fatality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Total Deaths.
You should probably go fuck yourself now. Unless you think 2.2% of the earth's population died in the last couple weeks. -
now it's 5, worsh your fucking hands Worshington
-
-
Dems are getting excited ADHD.
-
The sad truthDJDuck said:Dems are getting excited ADHD.
-
So are you walking back that you were talking out of your ass on mortality rate of 2%?BleachedAnusDawg said:
If you get this virus you are much more likely to die from it than if you get the flu. It also has a much higher transmission rate than the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
People are confusing the case-fatality rate and the mortality rate, which are not the same thing.pawz said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.MikeDamone said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.PurpleThrobber said:
You should look at the global population and use the term 'Mortality Rate' properly.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You should look at overall statistics and not cherry pick data from the US where the virus is just starting to emerge.PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Mortality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Population
Case Fatality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Total Deaths.
You should probably go fuck yourself now. Unless you think 2.2% of the earth's population died in the last couple weeks.
-
I didn't write it. Go after the source author if it gets you that upset. You and several others here are still wrong about the flu being more "deadly," even if the odds of actually dying from either is low. It's intellectually lazy to sit back and say more people die from the flu because that number is apples and oranges.PurpleThrobber said:
So are you walking back that you were talking out of your ass on mortality rate of 2%?BleachedAnusDawg said:
If you get this virus you are much more likely to die from it than if you get the flu. It also has a much higher transmission rate than the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
People are confusing the case-fatality rate and the mortality rate, which are not the same thing.pawz said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.MikeDamone said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.PurpleThrobber said:
You should look at the global population and use the term 'Mortality Rate' properly.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You should look at overall statistics and not cherry pick data from the US where the virus is just starting to emerge.PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Mortality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Population
Case Fatality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Total Deaths.
You should probably go fuck yourself now. Unless you think 2.2% of the earth's population died in the last couple weeks. -
Maff is hard, I know.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I didn't write it. Go after the source author if it gets you that upset. You and several others here are still wrong about the flu being more "deadly," even if the odds of actually dying from either is low. It's intellectually lazy to sit back and say more people die from the flu because that number is apples and oranges.PurpleThrobber said:
So are you walking back that you were talking out of your ass on mortality rate of 2%?BleachedAnusDawg said:
If you get this virus you are much more likely to die from it than if you get the flu. It also has a much higher transmission rate than the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
People are confusing the case-fatality rate and the mortality rate, which are not the same thing.pawz said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.MikeDamone said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.PurpleThrobber said:
You should look at the global population and use the term 'Mortality Rate' properly.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You should look at overall statistics and not cherry pick data from the US where the virus is just starting to emerge.PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Mortality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Population
Case Fatality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Total Deaths.
You should probably go fuck yourself now. Unless you think 2.2% of the earth's population died in the last couple weeks.
Walk it back. -
You weren't talking about math. The math is that more people die from this when they contract it vs the flu. You were wrong about that and go on a rant about the definition of mortality rate. Fuck off, boomer.PurpleThrobber said:
Maff is hard, I know.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I didn't write it. Go after the source author if it gets you that upset. You and several others here are still wrong about the flu being more "deadly," even if the odds of actually dying from either is low. It's intellectually lazy to sit back and say more people die from the flu because that number is apples and oranges.PurpleThrobber said:
So are you walking back that you were talking out of your ass on mortality rate of 2%?BleachedAnusDawg said:
If you get this virus you are much more likely to die from it than if you get the flu. It also has a much higher transmission rate than the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
People are confusing the case-fatality rate and the mortality rate, which are not the same thing.pawz said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.MikeDamone said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.PurpleThrobber said:
You should look at the global population and use the term 'Mortality Rate' properly.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You should look at overall statistics and not cherry pick data from the US where the virus is just starting to emerge.PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Mortality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Population
Case Fatality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Total Deaths.
You should probably go fuck yourself now. Unless you think 2.2% of the earth's population died in the last couple weeks.
Walk it back. -
I’m really sorry you can’t do math or read.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You weren't talking about math. The math is that more people die from this when they contract it vs the flu. You were wrong about that and go on a rant about the definition of mortality rate. Fuck off, boomer.PurpleThrobber said:
Maff is hard, I know.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I didn't write it. Go after the source author if it gets you that upset. You and several others here are still wrong about the flu being more "deadly," even if the odds of actually dying from either is low. It's intellectually lazy to sit back and say more people die from the flu because that number is apples and oranges.PurpleThrobber said:
So are you walking back that you were talking out of your ass on mortality rate of 2%?BleachedAnusDawg said:
If you get this virus you are much more likely to die from it than if you get the flu. It also has a much higher transmission rate than the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
People are confusing the case-fatality rate and the mortality rate, which are not the same thing.pawz said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.MikeDamone said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.PurpleThrobber said:
You should look at the global population and use the term 'Mortality Rate' properly.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You should look at overall statistics and not cherry pick data from the US where the virus is just starting to emerge.PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Mortality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Population
Case Fatality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Total Deaths.
You should probably go fuck yourself now. Unless you think 2.2% of the earth's population died in the last couple weeks.
Walk it back.
Actually I’m not sorry. You can’t do math or read. Nothing I should be sorry about. -
Read the numbers on infections and deaths and see if you can add things up. Better yet, let me do it for you. Most generous numbers for the flu in the US has it killing about 1 in 150 in the US this season. 6 of 100 reported corona virus cases thus far have resulted in death. It would take another 800 reported cases without a death to fall to that rate for the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
I’m really sorry you can’t do math or read.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You weren't talking about math. The math is that more people die from this when they contract it vs the flu. You were wrong about that and go on a rant about the definition of mortality rate. Fuck off, boomer.PurpleThrobber said:
Maff is hard, I know.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I didn't write it. Go after the source author if it gets you that upset. You and several others here are still wrong about the flu being more "deadly," even if the odds of actually dying from either is low. It's intellectually lazy to sit back and say more people die from the flu because that number is apples and oranges.PurpleThrobber said:
So are you walking back that you were talking out of your ass on mortality rate of 2%?BleachedAnusDawg said:
If you get this virus you are much more likely to die from it than if you get the flu. It also has a much higher transmission rate than the flu.PurpleThrobber said:
People are confusing the case-fatality rate and the mortality rate, which are not the same thing.pawz said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.MikeDamone said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Higher mortality rate and higher rate of transmission. Go drink a shitty Kokanee.PurpleThrobber said:
You should look at the global population and use the term 'Mortality Rate' properly.BleachedAnusDawg said:
You should look at overall statistics and not cherry pick data from the US where the virus is just starting to emerge.PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Mortality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Population
Case Fatality Rate = Total Deaths to Disease/Total Deaths.
You should probably go fuck yourself now. Unless you think 2.2% of the earth's population died in the last couple weeks.
Walk it back.
Actually I’m not sorry. You can’t do math or read. Nothing I should be sorry about.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-disease-2019-vs-the-flu
-
What's your point, pin head?
You still think 2% of earth died this month?
-
LOLPurpleThrobber said:What's your point, pin head?
You still think 2% of earth died this month? -
PurpleThrobber said:
No....it's not. The Mortality Rate is based on total population. There's been, what, one death in the US from coronavirus - the flu still has a way higher mortality rate.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Mortality rate of corona virus is actually much higher than the flu. Also no shot to prevent or mitigate its effects. If as many people get this virus in the US as they do the flu there will be many more deaths.MikeDamone said:
No flu in Kirkland to worry about?pawz said:At Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland.
Too. Fucking. Close. To. Home.
https://apnews.com/f175d89567a26d59cab27725c9e8a0d7
Follow the link:
https://medium.com/swlh/the-reported-mortality-rate-of-coronavirus-is-not-important-369989c8d912 -
Mortality rate from flu still higher in the US.
It's mathtastic.
-
Here: I help you with maff....use all your fingers and toes. Christ, I'll even use your own stats.
Base population of the US = approximately 325,000,000 people.
Mortality rate = Deaths from a particular disease divided by 325,000,000
2019-2020 Deaths from flu in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of flu = 12,000 / 325,000,000 = 0.0036923%
2019-2020 Deaths from coronavirus in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of coronavirus = 6 /325,000,000 = 0.0000018%
0.0036923% > 0.0000018%
Now go knock back a good dose of STFU.
-
Cool story, bro.PurpleThrobber said:Mortality rate from flu still higher in the US.
It's mathtastic. -
I'm not talking about mortality rate. My point the entire time has been that if you contract corona virus, as of now, the numbers say you're more likely to die from it than the flu. Please, keep ignoring the point and obsessing over mortality rate which was not what I intended to get at.PurpleThrobber said:Here: I help you with maff....use all your fingers and toes.
Base population of the US = approximately 325,000,000 people.
Mortality rate = Deaths from a particular disease divided by 325,000,000
2019-2020 Deaths from flu in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of flu = 10,000 / 325,000,000 = 0.0030769%
2019-2020 Deaths from coronavirus in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of coronavirus = 6 /325,000,000 = 0.0000018%
0.0030769% > 0.0000018%
Now go knock back a good dose of STFU.
You get mad way too easy. Sad way to go through life. -
And once you wrap your peabrain around that maff....let's move on to higher level statistics.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html
In the US, cases of the flu range between 25,000,000 and 45,000,000 each year.
In the US there are currently 43 cases of coronavirus.
On the low end, the sample of coronavirus compared to the population is approximately 1/1,000,000th of the high end of flu incidence and 1/500,000th on the low end.
That means shit statistically.
Now, go grab your nuts and stock up on toilet paper. The world is clearly ending.
-
Better than fat, dumb and stupid.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I'm not talking about mortality rate. My point the entire time has been that if you contract corona virus, as of now, the numbers say you're more likely to die from it than the flu. Please, keep ignoring the point and obsessing over mortality rate which was not what I intended to get at.PurpleThrobber said:Here: I help you with maff....use all your fingers and toes.
Base population of the US = approximately 325,000,000 people.
Mortality rate = Deaths from a particular disease divided by 325,000,000
2019-2020 Deaths from flu in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of flu = 10,000 / 325,000,000 = 0.0030769%
2019-2020 Deaths from coronavirus in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of coronavirus = 6 /325,000,000 = 0.0000018%
0.0030769% > 0.0000018%
Now go knock back a good dose of STFU.
You get mad way too easy. Sad way to go through life.
You do you.
-
I am 6'5" 260 lbs. Former Army Ranger and college basketball player. You really don't want any in real life. You are little more than a cowardly pussy.PurpleThrobber said:
Better than fat, dumb and stupid.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I'm not talking about mortality rate. My point the entire time has been that if you contract corona virus, as of now, the numbers say you're more likely to die from it than the flu. Please, keep ignoring the point and obsessing over mortality rate which was not what I intended to get at.PurpleThrobber said:Here: I help you with maff....use all your fingers and toes.
Base population of the US = approximately 325,000,000 people.
Mortality rate = Deaths from a particular disease divided by 325,000,000
2019-2020 Deaths from flu in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of flu = 10,000 / 325,000,000 = 0.0030769%
2019-2020 Deaths from coronavirus in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of coronavirus = 6 /325,000,000 = 0.0000018%
0.0030769% > 0.0000018%
Now go knock back a good dose of STFU.
You get mad way too easy. Sad way to go through life.
You do you. -
Internet tough guy.
-
There are probably hundreds if not thousands of undetected Covid cases. Many people probably think they have a cold. I'd pump the brakes on the more fatal narrative.
-
Wouldn't that same logic also apply to the flu?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:There are probably hundreds if not thousands of undetected Covid cases. Many people probably think they have a cold. I'd pump the brakes on the more fatal narrative.
I think it's less fatal than we think but still far more fatal than the flu. -
BleachedAnusDawg said:
Read the numbers on infections and deaths and see if you can add things up. Better yet, let me do it for you. Most generous numbers for the flu in the US has it killing about 1 in 150 in the US this season. 6 of 100 reported corona virus cases thus far have resulted in death. It would take another 800 reported cases without a death to fall to that rate for the flu.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-disease-2019-vs-the-flu
There's no point in laypersons doing mortality calculations based on the numbers above. The ranges are far too broad.PurpleThrobber said:Here: I help you with maff....use all your fingers and toes. Christ, I'll even use your own stats.
Base population of the US = approximately 325,000,000 people.
Mortality rate = Deaths from a particular disease divided by 325,000,000
2019-2020 Deaths from flu in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of flu = 12,000 / 325,000,000 = 0.0036923%
2019-2020 Deaths from coronavirus in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of coronavirus = 6 /325,000,000 = 0.0000018%
0.0036923% > 0.0000018%
Now go knock back a good dose of STFU. -
That goes into higher level statistics and probability...which is what I'm saying, the sample size is waaaaay too small to reach conclusions vs. historic influenza stats that have been tracked for years, if not decades.GrundleStiltzkin said:BleachedAnusDawg said:
Read the numbers on infections and deaths and see if you can add things up. Better yet, let me do it for you. Most generous numbers for the flu in the US has it killing about 1 in 150 in the US this season. 6 of 100 reported corona virus cases thus far have resulted in death. It would take another 800 reported cases without a death to fall to that rate for the flu.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-disease-2019-vs-the-flu
There's no point in laypersons doing mortality calculations based on the numbers above. The ranges are far too broad.PurpleThrobber said:Here: I help you with maff....use all your fingers and toes. Christ, I'll even use your own stats.
Base population of the US = approximately 325,000,000 people.
Mortality rate = Deaths from a particular disease divided by 325,000,000
2019-2020 Deaths from flu in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of flu = 12,000 / 325,000,000 = 0.0036923%
2019-2020 Deaths from coronavirus in US divided by 325,000,000
Mortality rate of coronavirus = 6 /325,000,000 = 0.0000018%
0.0036923% > 0.0000018%
Now go knock back a good dose of STFU.
Ebola, SSARS, Mersa....we've seen this doomsday, kill everybody shit before.
But but MEAN ORANGE MAN!!!!!
Fuck.
-
It's only been a number of weeks. Wait until Coronavirus gets its own strains in there.
Too early to see how this will go - normal flus have had YEARS to do their thing. LIPO -
COVID > SARS POTD.Sources said:It's only been a number of weeks. Wait until Coronavirus gets its own strains in there.
Too early to see how this will go - normal flus have had YEARS to do their thing. LIPO
Fluugs gotta Fluug.
