Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Here’s What The Lead Roger Stone Juror Said During Jury Selection
Comments
-
Trump’s DOJ prosecuted the case. It was in the papers.RaceBannon said:
Its all the same argument, hack. I have you down in favor of malicious prosecution of political enemies based on a lie and illegal taps. Poison fruit is welcomeHHusky said:
So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!RaceBannon said:
The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.HHusky said:
It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.RaceBannon said:
Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hackHHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time -
And the judge picked the juryHHusky said:
Her politics were known. Her social media presence was not anonymous. And there is no evidence that she and her 11 fellow members of a unanimous jury failed to look at the evidence impartially.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.HHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
But she has political opinions. Good luck on that new trial motion.
What is your point other than running cover for a police state?
She was the foreman and she was rabidly partisan and when that came out has no bearing. The judge is also a rabid partisan.
The Flynn case is already falling apart. This is soon to follow. The entire Mueller investigation was a sham and a mockery and this is the last hope for a veneer of respectability
And you're a lawyer. Gaia help us
9 years for what? -
The judge picked the jury?RaceBannon said:
And the judge picked the juryHHusky said:
Her politics were known. Her social media presence was not anonymous. And there is no evidence that she and her 11 fellow members of a unanimous jury failed to look at the evidence impartially.PurpleThrobber said:
Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.HHusky said:If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
But she has political opinions. Good luck on that new trial motion.
What is your point other than running cover for a police state?
She was the foreman and she was rabidly partisan and when that came out has no bearing. The judge is also a rabid partisan.
The Flynn case is already falling apart. This is soon to follow. The entire Mueller investigation was a sham and a mockery and this is the last hope for a veneer of respectability
And you're a lawyer. Gaia help us
9 years for what?
I’m just a lawyer, but that would be pretty newsworthy. You should contact the press. -
Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
-
Dugdawg said:
Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
-
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire. -
Why should I answer your question? You've refused to answer mine for three months.HHusky said:
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
So as the great philosopher Michael Damone once said
FUCK OFF!
-
So she lied, but you can’t say what her lie was.PurpleThrobber said:
Why should I answer your question? You've refused to answer mine for three months.HHusky said:
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
So as the great philosopher Michael Damone once said
FUCK OFF! -
What part of FUCK OFF was so difficult to understand?HHusky said:
So she lied, but you can’t say what her lie was.PurpleThrobber said:
Why should I answer your question? You've refused to answer mine for three months.HHusky said:
What did she lie about?PurpleThrobber said:Dugdawg said:Voir dire. You guys are pathetic.
It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere), i.e., to say what is true, what is objectively accurate or subjectively honest, or both.
Yeah...crazy telling the truth during voir dire.
So as the great philosopher Michael Damone once said
FUCK OFF!
-
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurors
Nip or Nap is the guy that said the counsel submitted questions but the judge made the call
Regardless we know the foreman was biased beyond any reasonable standard
Jack bootlicker
