Here’s What The Lead Roger Stone Juror Said During Jury Selection

DJDuck

“A former Democratic congressional candidate revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson on the jury that convicted Roger Stone.
Tomeka Hart said during the jury selection process that she did not “pay that close attention” to developments in the Russia investigation.
She also said that Stone’s links to President Donald Trump would “absolutely not” affect her views at trial.
But Hart’s social media posts show that she was closely tuned in to the Russia probe and that she considered Trump and his supporters to be racist.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/02/13/roger-stone-jury-selection/

DJDuck

Fox's Napolitano: Roger Stone 'absolutely entitled' to new trial after juror's tweets revealed

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurors

Bendintheriver

She is just another example of a low life lying rat. She should be prosecuted for lying in court. The left will praise her because that is what liars do. They FEEL justified in lying.

Notice one of the bitch's posts about Republicans being racist. She does the stupid rat thing and just proclaims everyone that disagrees with her is racist. I can guarantee you that if I asked her for one example of racist behavior by Trump, she could not give me one example. The rats on here are the exact same way. It just makes them FEEL GOOD to claim others are racist because they know deep down it is they who are what they claim others are.

PurpleThrobber

It's pretty clear this woman had bias vs. Trump and had no business sitting on a jury in a trial related to ANYTHING related to mean orange man.

This bitch needs brought up on perjury charges.

“Is there anything about that that affects your ability to judge him fairly and impartially sitting here right now in this courtroom?” Jackson queried.

“Absolutely not,” Hart answered.

2001400ex

And? Even if what you guys are saying is true. How does that make stone less guilty?

WestlinnDuck

Scratch a leftist find a fascist.

PurpleThrobber

WestlinnDuck said:

Scratch a leftist find a fascist.

Leftists hate the concept of a presumption of innocence.

Basic civics.

pawz

How are any of Stone's - ahem "crimes" - related to Trump or the campaign?

How did any of his - ahem "crimes" - require a predawn raid of his home? with teevee cameras?

All this shows is what happens when "injustice" rules the day. When Democrats hold the reins of power.

Now more than ever. #MAGA

2001400ex

pawz said:

How are any of Stone's - ahem "crimes" - related to Trump or the campaign?

How did any of his - ahem "crimes" - require a predawn raid of his home? with teevee cameras?

All this shows is what happens when "injustice" rules the day. When Democrats hold the reins of power.

Now more than ever. #MAGA

All of the was under Trump's DOJ. HTH

PurpleThrobber

pawz said:

How are any of Stone's - ahem "crimes" - related to Trump or the campaign?

How did any of his - ahem "crimes" - require a predawn raid of his home? with teevee cameras?

All this shows is what happens when "injustice" rules the day. When Democrats hold the reins of power.

Now more than ever. #MAGA

Stone is the underbelly of lowlife political activity. He's definitely a scumbag in my book. Not an OKG.

But that doesn't mean he is any less deserving of a fair trial with a presumption of innocence and an unbiased jury of his peers. If the prosecutors were so confident of their case with the deep resources of the US government behind them, THEY should have been the ones pointing out this jurors bias.

It's like the team with the most talent stealing signs during the World Series or something.....

RaceBannon

Fruit of the poison tree is basic.

As is equal application of the law

This is a preview of these pieces of shit getting power

PurpleThrobber

RaceBannon said:

Fruit of the poison tree is basic.

As is equal application of the law

This is a preview of these pieces of shit getting power

Trump just needed more tim to get his own acquittal in there.

Some of these fucks in the DOJ would be smart to take early retirement because they're fucking next.

HHusky

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack

It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack

It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.

The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.

At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack

It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.

The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.

At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time

So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack

It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.

The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.

At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time

So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!

Its all the same argument, hack. I have you down in favor of malicious prosecution of political enemies based on a lie and illegal taps. Poison fruit is welcome

HHusky

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.

Her politics were known. Her social media presence was not anonymous. And there is no evidence that she and her 11 fellow members of a unanimous jury failed to look at the evidence impartially.

But she has political opinions. Good luck on that new trial motion.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

Yeah, and the MAGA hat wearing kid doesn’t have a chance to win his case and the fact that the city of Ferguson settled with the Gentle Giant’s family proves that he really was shot in the back while running away.

Fuck off O’Keefed.