Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Here’s What The Lead Roger Stone Juror Said During Jury Selection

245

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,759 Standard Supporter

    Fruit of the poison tree is basic.

    As is equal application of the law

    This is a preview of these pieces of shit getting power

    Trump just needed more tim to get his own acquittal in there.

    Some of these fucks in the DOJ would be smart to take early retirement because they're fucking next.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,486
    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,938 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,486

    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack
    It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,938 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack
    It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.
    The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.

    At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,486

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack
    It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.
    The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.

    At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time
    So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,759 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2020
    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,938 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Of course you do you authoritarian boot licking hack
    It is inconceivable that Stone’s defense team was unaware of her social media statements. Checking her out would have been SOP. Unless there was a motion to get rid of her that we don’t know about, I think a motion for a new trial is DOA.
    The juror is the least of the problems with the fascist prosecution. The Obama prosecutors trying to save Mueller's mangy ass and the coordination with CNN on a dawn raid and an Obama judge that is as impartial as you are.

    At least we found the one man in America that the left thinks belongs in prison for a long time
    So you’d prefer to make a different argument now. Good choice!
    Its all the same argument, hack. I have you down in favor of malicious prosecution of political enemies based on a lie and illegal taps. Poison fruit is welcome
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,486

    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Well, given your legal expertise, dazzler, that means absolutely jack shit.
    Her politics were known. Her social media presence was not anonymous. And there is no evidence that she and her 11 fellow members of a unanimous jury failed to look at the evidence impartially.

    But she has political opinions. Good luck on that new trial motion.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    HHusky said:

    If what’s being reported is the most damning evidence of juror misconduct, I think the case for a new trial is pretty weak.

    Yeah, and the MAGA hat wearing kid doesn’t have a chance to win his case and the fact that the city of Ferguson settled with the Gentle Giant’s family proves that he really was shot in the back while running away.

    Fuck off O’Keefed.