Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«13456710

Comments

  • proofproof Member Posts: 278
    Thought he was the potential odd man out, but it makes sense with how hard the staff has been pushing for in-state players to stay.
  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792
    proof said:

    Thought he was the potential odd man out, but it makes sense with how hard the staff has been pushing for in-state players to stay.

    Yep. Could be a momentum offer to start getting the in-state kids on board, similar to the way Tafisi and Mosiah Liu (RIP) were for the poly movement
  • proofproof Member Posts: 278
    edited February 2020
    NEsnake12 said:

    proof said:

    Thought he was the potential odd man out, but it makes sense with how hard the staff has been pushing for in-state players to stay.

    Yep. Could be a momentum offer to start getting the in-state kids on board, similar to the way Tafisi and Mosiah Liu (RIP) were for the poly movement
    With this offer 8/10 of the top players in WA have been offered. Other two are Josh McCarron (Please Offer) and Clay Millen.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,691
    proof said:

    Thought he was the potential odd man out, but it makes sense with how hard the staff has been pushing for in-state players to stay.

    This should tel you how confident the staff is in getting Franklin
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,975
    edited February 2020
    proof said:

    NEsnake12 said:

    proof said:

    Thought he was the potential odd man out, but it makes sense with how hard the staff has been pushing for in-state players to stay.

    Yep. Could be a momentum offer to start getting the in-state kids on board, similar to the way Tafisi and Mosiah Liu (RIP) were for the poly movement
    With this offer 8/10 of the top players in WA have been offered. Other two are Josh McCarron (Please Offer) and Clay Millen.
    I would love it if they could convince Clay Millen as to come in as a grayshirt...even if he assumed baby Huard will succeed then he plays as a freshman and leaves early which gives Clay a 2 year starting window if he wins the job afterwards.

    And if his brother gets stuck behind Tyler Shough and as an "or" to Butterfield I don't think Oregon will look that attractive to him.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited February 2020

    Interesting timing to offer Jabez. We only graduate one WR next year (Chin), although a couch sale or two is likely. So taking more than 3 WRs would be weird. But of course Emeka and Franklin are takes no matter what, and it sounds like both will be waiting awhile to commit. And they're both too good to be pressured to commit to save their 'spot'.

    Theoretically we view Junior > Jabez since we offered him first. Do we take the commit of one of them? Both? Is Jimmy going to more liberal with non-commitable offers to in-state kids?

    I guess it doesn't matter because if Emeka and Franklin want to commit you don't really worry about numbers, and it seems unlikely we get both. Might as well get the in-state kids in the class early. Especially since the California WR class doesn't seem all that great outside of Franklin and Beaux Collins, pretty rare to only have offered two California WRs at this point.

    Fuck it, I guess I've talked myself into it. I don't like either as much as any of the WRs we took in '20, but it could just be a down year. And there's value in getting Sam's teammates and loading up on in-state kids.

    There will be a couch sale or two before this season even begins. Ty Jones, Osborne, Spiker, Chin... Very possible only 1 or 2 stay. Taj Davis is young but if he’s like the 8th WR, he’s another that could go. Attrition is happening with that group.

    I agree that both Kennedy kids are underwhelming. Would be interesting if they would get offers if they didn’t play for Huard and a team that hucks the ball around. Both without Franklin and/or Egbuka would be really shitty.
  • CallMeBigErnCallMeBigErn Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,387 Swaye's Wigwam

    Interesting timing to offer Jabez. We only graduate one WR next year (Chin), although a couch sale or two is likely. So taking more than 3 WRs would be weird. But of course Emeka and Franklin are takes no matter what, and it sounds like both will be waiting awhile to commit. And they're both too good to be pressured to commit to save their 'spot'.

    Theoretically we view Junior > Jabez since we offered him first. Do we take the commit of one of them? Both? Is Jimmy going to more liberal with non-commitable offers to in-state kids?

    I guess it doesn't matter because if Emeka and Franklin want to commit you don't really worry about numbers, and it seems unlikely we get both. Might as well get the in-state kids in the class early. Especially since the California WR class doesn't seem all that great outside of Franklin and Beaux Collins, pretty rare to only have offered two California WRs at this point.

    Fuck it, I guess I've talked myself into it. I don't like either as much as any of the WRs we took in '20, but it could just be a down year. And there's value in getting Sam's teammates and loading up on in-state kids.

    There will be a couch sale or two before this season even begins. Ty Jones, Osborne, Spiker, Chin... Very possible only 1 or 2 stay. Taj Davis is young but if he’s like the 8th WR, he’s another that could go. Attrition is happening with that group.

    I agree that both Kennedy kids are underwhelming. Would be interesting if they would get offers if they didn’t play for Huard and a team that hucks the ball around. Both without Franklin and/or Egbuka would be really shitty.
    You're saying 4 WR might sell couches. That is full on anti-doog. That being said, please bump this when it happens.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,837

    Interesting timing to offer Jabez. We only graduate one WR next year (Chin), although a couch sale or two is likely. So taking more than 3 WRs would be weird. But of course Emeka and Franklin are takes no matter what, and it sounds like both will be waiting awhile to commit. And they're both too good to be pressured to commit to save their 'spot'.

    Theoretically we view Junior > Jabez since we offered him first. Do we take the commit of one of them? Both? Is Jimmy going to more liberal with non-commitable offers to in-state kids?

    I guess it doesn't matter because if Emeka and Franklin want to commit you don't really worry about numbers, and it seems unlikely we get both. Might as well get the in-state kids in the class early. Especially since the California WR class doesn't seem all that great outside of Franklin and Beaux Collins, pretty rare to only have offered two California WRs at this point.

    Fuck it, I guess I've talked myself into it. I don't like either as much as any of the WRs we took in '20, but it could just be a down year. And there's value in getting Sam's teammates and loading up on in-state kids.

    There will be a couch sale or two before this season even begins. Ty Jones, Osborne, Spiker, Chin... Very possible only 1 or 2 stay. Taj Davis is young but if he’s like the 8th WR, he’s another that could go. Attrition is happening with that group.

    I agree that both Kennedy kids are underwhelming. Would be interesting if they would get offers if they didn’t play for Huard and a team that hucks the ball around. Both without Franklin and/or Egbuka would be really shitty.
    I wouldn’t be surprised if Jones or Chin moved on ... I think there is a path to playing time for both Osborne and Spiker
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,445

    Interesting timing to offer Jabez. We only graduate one WR next year (Chin), although a couch sale or two is likely. So taking more than 3 WRs would be weird. But of course Emeka and Franklin are takes no matter what, and it sounds like both will be waiting awhile to commit. And they're both too good to be pressured to commit to save their 'spot'.

    Theoretically we view Junior > Jabez since we offered him first. Do we take the commit of one of them? Both? Is Jimmy going to more liberal with non-commitable offers to in-state kids?

    I guess it doesn't matter because if Emeka and Franklin want to commit you don't really worry about numbers, and it seems unlikely we get both. Might as well get the in-state kids in the class early. Especially since the California WR class doesn't seem all that great outside of Franklin and Beaux Collins, pretty rare to only have offered two California WRs at this point.

    Fuck it, I guess I've talked myself into it. I don't like either as much as any of the WRs we took in '20, but it could just be a down year. And there's value in getting Sam's teammates and loading up on in-state kids.

    There will be a couch sale or two before this season even begins. Ty Jones, Osborne, Spiker, Chin... Very possible only 1 or 2 stay. Taj Davis is young but if he’s like the 8th WR, he’s another that could go. Attrition is happening with that group.

    I agree that both Kennedy kids are underwhelming. Would be interesting if they would get offers if they didn’t play for Huard and a team that hucks the ball around. Both without Franklin and/or Egbuka would be really shitty.
    Spiker was getting solid reps at the end of the year. I think if Chin or Jones were going to portal they would've already done so by now. Chin probably recognizes he has zero shot at a professional career and might just enjoy being at UW. Same with Jones (who I wish would portal). I could see Osborne taking off if he's buried on the depth chart after spring ball.
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    I can imagine Lake will change the culture somewhat so that Pete's archaic rules of rolling out playing time so you eventually see the field your Jr and Sr years will be replaced by giving fresh legs the opportunity to fight for the ball early.... guys who display in-game ability will keep playing; those who don't (or only show up in practice) will not. Given so few of the WR depth chart has had a chance to play for realz I don't know what to expect (beyond Puka and Bynum, of course).
  • TommySQCTommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    Meek said:

    I can imagine Lake will change the culture somewhat so that Pete's archaic rules of rolling out playing time so you eventually see the field your Jr and Sr years will be replaced by giving fresh legs the opportunity to fight for the ball early.... guys who display in-game ability will keep playing; those who don't (or only show up in practice) will not. Given so few of the WR depth chart has had a chance to play for realz I don't know what to expect (beyond Puka and Bynum, of course).

    What's odd is that the DL has always had a rotation that played young guys since Pete has been here. I still maintain this philosphy belongs to the position coaches. Ultimately, Pete should have stepped in and forced their hands but Pete is a process guy and lets his coaches do their jobs.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Tequilla said:

    Interesting timing to offer Jabez. We only graduate one WR next year (Chin), although a couch sale or two is likely. So taking more than 3 WRs would be weird. But of course Emeka and Franklin are takes no matter what, and it sounds like both will be waiting awhile to commit. And they're both too good to be pressured to commit to save their 'spot'.

    Theoretically we view Junior > Jabez since we offered him first. Do we take the commit of one of them? Both? Is Jimmy going to more liberal with non-commitable offers to in-state kids?

    I guess it doesn't matter because if Emeka and Franklin want to commit you don't really worry about numbers, and it seems unlikely we get both. Might as well get the in-state kids in the class early. Especially since the California WR class doesn't seem all that great outside of Franklin and Beaux Collins, pretty rare to only have offered two California WRs at this point.

    Fuck it, I guess I've talked myself into it. I don't like either as much as any of the WRs we took in '20, but it could just be a down year. And there's value in getting Sam's teammates and loading up on in-state kids.

    There will be a couch sale or two before this season even begins. Ty Jones, Osborne, Spiker, Chin... Very possible only 1 or 2 stay. Taj Davis is young but if he’s like the 8th WR, he’s another that could go. Attrition is happening with that group.

    I agree that both Kennedy kids are underwhelming. Would be interesting if they would get offers if they didn’t play for Huard and a team that hucks the ball around. Both without Franklin and/or Egbuka would be really shitty.
    I wouldn’t be surprised if Jones or Chin moved on ... I think there is a path to playing time for both Osborne and Spiker
    Tequilla said:

    Interesting timing to offer Jabez. We only graduate one WR next year (Chin), although a couch sale or two is likely. So taking more than 3 WRs would be weird. But of course Emeka and Franklin are takes no matter what, and it sounds like both will be waiting awhile to commit. And they're both too good to be pressured to commit to save their 'spot'.

    Theoretically we view Junior > Jabez since we offered him first. Do we take the commit of one of them? Both? Is Jimmy going to more liberal with non-commitable offers to in-state kids?

    I guess it doesn't matter because if Emeka and Franklin want to commit you don't really worry about numbers, and it seems unlikely we get both. Might as well get the in-state kids in the class early. Especially since the California WR class doesn't seem all that great outside of Franklin and Beaux Collins, pretty rare to only have offered two California WRs at this point.

    Fuck it, I guess I've talked myself into it. I don't like either as much as any of the WRs we took in '20, but it could just be a down year. And there's value in getting Sam's teammates and loading up on in-state kids.

    There will be a couch sale or two before this season even begins. Ty Jones, Osborne, Spiker, Chin... Very possible only 1 or 2 stay. Taj Davis is young but if he’s like the 8th WR, he’s another that could go. Attrition is happening with that group.

    I agree that both Kennedy kids are underwhelming. Would be interesting if they would get offers if they didn’t play for Huard and a team that hucks the ball around. Both without Franklin and/or Egbuka would be really shitty.
    I wouldn’t be surprised if Jones or Chin moved on ... I think there is a path to playing time for both Osborne and Spiker
    I don’t think all of those guys will transfer but at least 1, and probably more likely 2 or 3 will.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,837
    I could see Chin transfer to somewhere where he can get some snaps ... not sure where he is at from a graduating standpoint

    I wouldn’t be shocked if Jones walked as a senior this year ... I’ve heard some things that suggest he is playing more school than football (nothing wrong with that per se)

    The depth chart will be wide open now that we’ve hopefully moved on from the seniority BS
  • chuckchuck Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,999 Swaye's Wigwam
    Both of the Kennedy WR look really good to me. Tinae in particular is really good after the catch. His hands look good, he's a legit slot guy who can make big plays out of quick slants and screens but he's not a fly weight midget.

    UW WR depth, aside from the incoming guys and Nacua, lacks guys who are threats with the ball in their hands. I'd consider Tinae a take even if he's the 4th WR in a class where we may not need four.
  • chuckchuck Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,999 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:

    Both of the Kennedy WR look really good to me. Tinae in particular is really good after the catch. His hands look good, he's a legit slot guy who can make big plays out of quick slants and screens but he's not a fly weight midget.

    UW WR depth, aside from the incoming guys and Nacua, lacks guys who are threats with the ball in their hands. I'd consider Tinae a take even if he's the 4th WR in a class where we may not need four.

    You’re normally good at this, so I will take your word. I still think you’re off on Sunday tho. He’s going to be a beast RB for us if he makes it here.
    Not sure I agree with the bolded statement, but I do appreciate it. I have a lot of opinions so some turn out right.

    Sunday has some good traits for sure. He can be good if he sticks to what he's built for which is ramming that brick like frame into tacklers.
  • halfbrainmanmolderhalfbrainmanmolder Member Posts: 215
    Tequilla said:

    I could see Chin transfer to somewhere where he can get some snaps ... not sure where he is at from a graduating standpoint

    I wouldn’t be shocked if Jones walked as a senior this year ... I’ve heard some things that suggest he is playing more school than football (nothing wrong with that per se)

    The depth chart will be wide open now that we’ve hopefully moved on from the seniority BS

    What seniority bullshit are you talking about? Apart from the obvious misuse of WRs (opera singer in particular), there is absolutely no consistent pattern in not playing talented youngsters because of seniority. Even last year at WR position, Puka played as a true freshman. People spew nonsense without thinking or looking at the evidence. You might blame Pete for the offensive scheme which prevented young guys to excel early, but there was ZERO evidence that Pete makes personnel decision (other than QB of course) in position groups.
Sign In or Register to comment.