Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«134

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621
    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    Too bad we don't have a natural way to manage scarcity. Oh wait, we do.

    Someone shoulda told you.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,702 Standard Supporter
    Gee, the counselor admits that facilities (resources) are limited. But not really, because I'm told that open borders and providing welfare and free medical care to illegal immigrants isn't going to impact American citizens.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,812 Standard Supporter


    She should have checked a different box on the application.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,444 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,321 Founders Club
    The SARS scorecard reads 17% mortality in the soviet republic of Canada vs 0% mortality in the United States of America, Fuck ya!
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    So death panels are real then

    Good to know
    I've always told you they're real. Finally sink in?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,444 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


    This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

    And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,444 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


    This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

    And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

    You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

    That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

    If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.


  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


    This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

    And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

    You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

    That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

    If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.


    We're really lucky that insurance and hospital executives make the decisions about us then.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    So death panels are real then

    Good to know
    I've always told you they're real. Finally sink in?
    You should take this up with your squad and the politicians you voted for who mocked anyone who told the truth about death panels

    I want to be on a death panel. I can't afford to antagonize them.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,173 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:


    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


    This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

    And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

    You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

    That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

    If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.


    We're really lucky that insurance and hospital executives make the decisions about us then.
    You got the cash services are available. I know that's unbearable for socialists.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621

    HHusky said:


    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


    This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

    And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

    You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

    That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

    If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.


    We're really lucky that insurance and hospital executives make the decisions about us then.
    You got the cash services are available. I know that's unbearable for socialists.
    This treatment’s costs range from the low to the mid six figures, so I guess the kid whose parents have that cash are all set.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    Go ahead and rationalize it, loser. YBFE.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,173 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


    This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

    And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

    You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

    That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

    If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.


    We're really lucky that insurance and hospital executives make the decisions about us then.
    You got the cash services are available. I know that's unbearable for socialists.
    This treatment’s costs range from the low to the mid six figures, so I guess the kid whose parents have that cash are all set.
    So then that's better off than where no one gets it except I guess the oligarchs and elites in government.

    Allow the free market to incentivize cost savings and innovation and it might even be as easy to acquire as a cell phone.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,621
    edited February 2020

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:


    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:
    Facilities are finite under all systems. Someone shoulda told you.
    They're finite when you only get to do a certain number of procedures. The Canadian government sets those numbers. They stop paying when the allotment is consumed.

    Make an American who couldn't get this procedure?

    Not having a match is one thing but not having the "means" to do more than 5 a month is lunacy. If Trudeau won't pay you die.

    Maybe they'll soon move to a lottery system for procedures.
    I don't think you read your own article.

    But you'll fit in well with the "healthcare is a right" crowd.

    Hope they don't go to a lottery. The treatment you're talking about has a high mortality rate, which gets worse when you've already been treated and the disease has returned. Probably best to take those who have the best chance of surviving the treatment first.
    You didn't read it. "Resources" and "means" not relapse were the reason she wasn't treated.

    I see you were unable to find me an American with a donor ready to go who dead because we didn't have the means or resources. The government doesn't tell the hospital/doctors how many procedures they can do per year.


    This isn't a wheel them in and out thing. They didn't have enough beds to provide immediate service. That's not surprising since the treatment lasts months.

    And I didn't say your article mentioned the relapse as a reason she didn't get treated. I simply provided you some facts you probably didn't know. The fact she had been treated before would have been a legitimate medical reason to prefer a candidate who hadn't been treated before. I don't know whether that was also a consideration. It should have been.

    You don't know socialized medicine has actual limits on things like number of procedures.

    That's why you can't find a comfortable situation here in the free world.

    If your reasons were correct we'd see it here.


    We're really lucky that insurance and hospital executives make the decisions about us then.
    You got the cash services are available. I know that's unbearable for socialists.
    This treatment’s costs range from the low to the mid six figures, so I guess the kid whose parents have that cash are all set.
    So then that's better off than where no one gets it except I guess the oligarchs and elites in government.

    Allow the free market to incentivize cost savings and innovation and it might even be as easy to acquire as a cell phone.
    The very existence of the treatment reflects the fact that innovation isn’t being stifled. But a course of intense and risky treatment that can run three months or more isn’t likely to ever become cheap or easy to acquire.
Sign In or Register to comment.