blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
House was free to take him to court. They chose not to.
blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
House was free to take him to court. They chose not to.
Our smarter readers will note that that does not refute my claim of a cover-up.
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
Open an investigation. I don't care.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?
Most likely abundance.
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.
I do?
That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.
So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?
Obvious answer is obvious.
Abundance.
I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.
I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".
Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
Open an investigation. I don't care.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?
Most likely abundance.
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.
I do?
That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.
So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?
Obvious answer is obvious.
Abundance.
I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.
I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".
Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.
blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
House was free to take him to court. They chose not to.
Our smarter readers will note that that does not refute my claim of a cover-up.
Exercising Executive Privilege doesn't equal a cover up but as we all know, you're a really shitty lawyer.
The White House has told former national security adviser John Bolton not to publish his upcoming tell-all about his time in the Trump administration until classified material is removed from the manuscript.
“Under federal law and the nondisclosure agreements your client signed as a condition for gaining access to classified information, the manuscript may not be published or otherwise disclosed without the deletion of this classified information,” Ellen J. Knight, a National Security Council aide, wrote in a letter to Bolton attorney Charles J. Cooper last week, which was obtained by Fox News.
Funny how the House kept a lot of stuff behind closed doors including the third hand testimony of the whistle blower but printing national security documents to get Trump is fine
blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
House was free to take him to court. They chose not to.
Our smarter readers will note that that does not refute my claim of a cover-up.
Exercising Executive Privilege doesn't equal a cover up but as we all know, you're a really shitty lawyer.
Calling a blanket refusal "executive privilege" was great branding. Gotta hand it to Daddy. He knows how to fling the bullshit.
blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Trump said talk to the AG (attorney general) that was absolutely appropriate and nothing illegal, immoral or wrong.
I spelled or out for you since this lawyer stuff is hard for you.
blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.
If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.
Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?
I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
House was free to take him to court. They chose not to.
Our smarter readers will note that that does not refute my claim of a cover-up.
Exercising Executive Privilege doesn't equal a cover up but as we all know, you're a really shitty lawyer.
Calling a blanket refusal "executive privilege" was great branding. Gotta hand it to Daddy. He knows how to fling the bullshit.
And yet your team still refused to litigate it. Maybe they realized that they were shitty lawyers just like you.
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
Open an investigation. I don't care.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?
Most likely abundance.
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.
I do?
That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.
So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?
Obvious answer is obvious.
Abundance.
I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.
I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".
Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
Open an investigation. I don't care.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?
Most likely abundance.
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.
I do?
That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.
So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?
Obvious answer is obvious.
Abundance.
I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.
I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".
Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
Open an investigation. I don't care.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?
Most likely abundance.
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.
I do?
That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.
So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?
Obvious answer is obvious.
Abundance.
I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.
I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".
Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.
I travel to Salem a lot.
Yes. Corky. I got that the first time.
No. It’s quite evident you didn’t.
You bounce the ball well. I have to give you that.
Comments
Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
Hands up don't shoot!!!!
Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.
House was free to take him to court. They chose not to.
Our smarter readers will note that that does not refute my claim of a cover-up.
Exercising Executive Privilege doesn't equal a cover up but as we all know, you're a really shitty lawyer.
The White House has told former national security adviser John Bolton not to publish his upcoming tell-all about his time in the Trump administration until classified material is removed from the manuscript.
“Under federal law and the nondisclosure agreements your client signed as a condition for gaining access to classified information, the manuscript may not be published or otherwise disclosed without the deletion of this classified information,” Ellen J. Knight, a National Security Council aide, wrote in a letter to Bolton attorney Charles J. Cooper last week, which was obtained by Fox News.
Funny how the House kept a lot of stuff behind closed doors including the third hand testimony of the whistle blower but printing national security documents to get Trump is fine
Calling a blanket refusal "executive privilege" was great branding. Gotta hand it to Daddy. He knows how to fling the bullshit.
Trump said talk to the AG (attorney general) that was absolutely appropriate and nothing illegal, immoral or wrong.
I spelled or out for you since this lawyer stuff is hard for you.
And yet your team still refused to litigate it. Maybe they realized that they were shitty lawyers just like you.