You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
America has concluded there is no there there with Trump
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit
You should probably just stick with “We’ve got the votes.” You know there’s no direct evidence that helps Daddy. That’s why some of you are imploring your team to endorse Daddy’s obstruction of this “trial”.
There's no direct evidence against Trump you blithering idiot
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that.
Who here has said there's no issues with Biden, Burisms, etc. Investigate that shit all you want. Put Biden in jail if he did what you contend. But that has nothing to do with whether Trump committed treason or high crime and misdemeanor.
Laughing at the rest of your comment talking about "smart people".
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
Every bit as good as an anonymous source causing Bolton said something.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.
Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed.
I’ve always credited Daddy as shitty at collusion. But he tried.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
Every bit as good as an anonymous source causing Bolton said something.
Double standard much?
I don’t believe Fiona Hill is anonymous. You’re not good at this.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.
Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.
Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed.
I’ve always credited Daddy as shitty at collusion. But he tried.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.
Trumps done nothing wrong let alone impeachable. Keep dreaming.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.
Or he could have just directed the DOJ to do it. (Maybe he did and they found no case to pursue.)
Keep in mind Trump thinks everyone is in the swamp and is part of the problem except the people close to him that he trusts. He's right to feel that way in most cases that are important. Going to need a few more years to clean things up and build that trust.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.
Or he could have just directed the DOJ to do it. (Maybe he did and they found no case to pursue.)
Keep in mind Trump thinks everyone is in the swamp and is part of the problem except the people close to him that he trusts. He's right to feel that way in most cases that are important. Going to need a few more years to clean things up and build that trust.
In the hours after National Security Advisor John Bolton was fired by President Donald Trump on September 10th, he immediately began calling longtime political operatives in Washington, DC, sources tell The Chronicle. Many of those calls were made to Democrats and many of them in the national security establishment.
One of those contacts was the intelligence agency whistleblower who filed the now-famous complaint pertaining to the President’s call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, that is now the subject of intense congressional scrutiny. That complaint was filed only weeks before, on August 12th. The source alleges that the whistleblower was given the information that comprises the contents of his complaint from Bolton himself, which if true would constitute an extraordinary breach of national security and an indictable offense punishable by imprisonment. “It’s go time,” he began those conversations, multiple sources tell The Chronicle, as if to suggest that Bolton’s patience with the President had worn thin, and even implying later in more than one conversation that a faction of neo-conservatives at the Central Intelligence Agency was ready to remove the President from office.
Comments
Laughing at the rest of your comment talking about "smart people".
Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed.
Double standard much?
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
Got to love the HH hypocrisy on display. Hey HH, Ukrainian President also said there was no quid pro quo or pressure put on him by Trump.
I guess that doesn't count as a conclusion to a biased rat like yourself though right?
You need to get your stories straight. You are losing track of your bullshit.
No worries. #Ivanka2024 got this.
https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/09/26/bolton-contacted-whistleblower-prior-to-filing-complaint-suggesting-an-attempted-coup/
In the hours after National Security Advisor John Bolton was fired by President Donald Trump on September 10th, he immediately began calling longtime political operatives in Washington, DC, sources tell The Chronicle. Many of those calls were made to Democrats and many of them in the national security establishment.
One of those contacts was the intelligence agency whistleblower who filed the now-famous complaint pertaining to the President’s call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, that is now the subject of intense congressional scrutiny. That complaint was filed only weeks before, on August 12th. The source alleges that the whistleblower was given the information that comprises the contents of his complaint from Bolton himself, which if true would constitute an extraordinary breach of national security and an indictable offense punishable by imprisonment.
“It’s go time,” he began those conversations, multiple sources tell The Chronicle, as if to suggest that Bolton’s patience with the President had worn thin, and even implying later in more than one conversation that a faction of neo-conservatives at the Central Intelligence Agency was ready to remove the President from office.
If true Bolton won't be laughing for long
The agencies transcend party.
This is Homeland type bullshit. Take the L and move on.
Find better candidates too.
Pussy fucks like Romney take the bait
The Democrats problem is that Bolton testimony costs them Biden