You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
As if we needed more evidence that you can't read and interpret.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.
Or he could have just directed the DOJ to do it. (Maybe he did and they found no case to pursue.)
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.
Or he could have just directed the DOJ to do it. (Maybe he did and they found no case to pursue.)
Keep in mind Trump thinks everyone is in the swamp and is part of the problem except the people close to him that he trusts. He's right to feel that way in most cases that are important. Going to need a few more years to clean things up and build that trust.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.
Or he could have just directed the DOJ to do it. (Maybe he did and they found no case to pursue.)
Keep in mind Trump thinks everyone is in the swamp and is part of the problem except the people close to him that he trusts. He's right to feel that way in most cases that are important. Going to need a few more years to clean things up and build that trust.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
So Ukraine hasn't been investigating the Biden's for 4 years? You're very skilled at talking out of both sides of your mouth O'Keefed.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
America has concluded there is no there there with Trump
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
America has concluded there is no there there with Trump
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit
You forget all the investigations into Obama and Hillary.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
America has concluded there is no there there with Trump
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit
You should probably just stick with “We’ve got the votes.” You know there’s no direct evidence that helps Daddy. That’s why some of you are imploring your team to endorse Daddy’s obstruction of this “trial”.
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.
Biden confessed
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
America has concluded there is no there there with Trump
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit
You should probably just stick with “We’ve got the votes.” You know there’s no direct evidence that helps Daddy. That’s why some of you are imploring your team to endorse Daddy’s obstruction of this “trial”.
There's no direct evidence against Trump you blithering idiot
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Comments
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
Go with that! It’s brilliant!
Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit
The house has no case. That's your problem