Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This Bolton shit
Comments
-
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy. -
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him. -
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him. -
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.SFGbob said:
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him. -
So Ukraine hasn't been investigating the Biden's for 4 years? You're very skilled at talking out of both sides of your mouth O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.SFGbob said:
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him. -
America has concluded there is no there there with TrumpHHusky said:
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.SFGbob said:
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit -
You forget all the investigations into Obama and Hillary.RaceBannon said:
America has concluded there is no there there with TrumpHHusky said:
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.SFGbob said:
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit -
You should probably just stick with “We’ve got the votes.” You know there’s no direct evidence that helps Daddy. That’s why some of you are imploring your team to endorse Daddy’s obstruction of this “trial”.RaceBannon said:
America has concluded there is no there there with TrumpHHusky said:
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.SFGbob said:
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit -
There's no direct evidence against Trump you blithering idiotHHusky said:
You should probably just stick with “We’ve got the votes.” You know there’s no direct evidence that helps Daddy. That’s why some of you are imploring your team to endorse Daddy’s obstruction of this “trial”.RaceBannon said:
America has concluded there is no there there with TrumpHHusky said:
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.SFGbob said:
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit
The house has no case. That's your problem -
Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
-
And the emperor’s clothes? How do you like them?RaceBannon said:
There's no direct evidence against Trump you blithering idiotHHusky said:
You should probably just stick with “We’ve got the votes.” You know there’s no direct evidence that helps Daddy. That’s why some of you are imploring your team to endorse Daddy’s obstruction of this “trial”.RaceBannon said:
America has concluded there is no there there with TrumpHHusky said:
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.SFGbob said:
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?HHusky said:
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation. And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
More than once
Doesn't stop endless investigation of a political opponent by the Democrats
Announced and everything
You guys can't even track your own bullshit
The house has no case. That's your problem -
Who here has said there's no issues with Biden, Burisms, etc. Investigate that shit all you want. Put Biden in jail if he did what you contend. But that has nothing to do with whether Trump committed treason or high crime and misdemeanor.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that.
Laughing at the rest of your comment talking about "smart people". -
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding. -
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.Sledog said:
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding. -
Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.HHusky said:
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.Sledog said:
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed. -
Every bit as good as an anonymous source causing Bolton said something.HHusky said:
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.Sledog said:
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Double standard much? -
I’ve always credited Daddy as shitty at collusion. But he tried.SFGbob said:
Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.HHusky said:
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.Sledog said:
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed. -
I don’t believe Fiona Hill is anonymous. You’re not good at this.Sledog said:
Every bit as good as an anonymous source causing Bolton said something.HHusky said:
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.Sledog said:
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Double standard much? -
2.5 years and bupkis. Needed 3?HHusky said:
I’ve always credited Daddy as shitty at collusion. But he tried.SFGbob said:
Said the Kunt who was all over the claim the Trump collided with the Russians to steal the election.HHusky said:
An insinuation now passes as evidence? Perhaps your “retirement” wasn’t as voluntary as you’ve been saying.Sledog said:
And Hunter never gave daddy a cent.....HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Hypocrisy and lies are all you have O’Keefed. -
Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy. -
Trumps done nothing wrong let alone impeachable. Keep dreaming.GDS said:
Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy. -
NOGAF what a lying pedophile remembers. Fuck off.GDS said:
Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy. -
<
Cool. It’s been four years. When should we expect to see Joe perp walked?
Ukraine has been investigating the Bidens for 4 years? Got a link?
Ukraine seems to have concluded there’s no there there. Pick your poison.
Got to love the HH hypocrisy on display. Hey HH, Ukrainian President also said there was no quid pro quo or pressure put on him by Trump.
I guess that doesn't count as a conclusion to a biased rat like yourself though right?
You need to get your stories straight. You are losing track of your bullshit. -
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
-
DoogieMcDoogerson said:
Keep in mind Trump thinks everyone is in the swamp and is part of the problem except the people close to him that he trusts. He's right to feel that way in most cases that are important. Going to need a few more years to clean things up and build that trust.HHusky said:
Or he could have just directed the DOJ to do it. (Maybe he did and they found no case to pursue.)DoogieMcDoogerson said:
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
No worries. #Ivanka2024 got this.
-
They're Real and they're Spectacular.PurpleThrobber said:DoogieMcDoogerson said:
Keep in mind Trump thinks everyone is in the swamp and is part of the problem except the people close to him that he trusts. He's right to feel that way in most cases that are important. Going to need a few more years to clean things up and build that trust.HHusky said:
Or he could have just directed the DOJ to do it. (Maybe he did and they found no case to pursue.)DoogieMcDoogerson said:
You fuckers ever wonder why announcing the investigations might be important in actually getting the investigations done? Perhaps getting a corrupt country to announce to the world would force them to actually do the investigations because they publicly said they'd do so. It might be something I'd try with a corrupt country...but I'm not a president or anything.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
No worries. #Ivanka2024 got this. -
-
Team TDS loves anonymous leaks so it must be so
In the hours after National Security Advisor John Bolton was fired by President Donald Trump on September 10th, he immediately began calling longtime political operatives in Washington, DC, sources tell The Chronicle. Many of those calls were made to Democrats and many of them in the national security establishment.
One of those contacts was the intelligence agency whistleblower who filed the now-famous complaint pertaining to the President’s call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, that is now the subject of intense congressional scrutiny. That complaint was filed only weeks before, on August 12th. The source alleges that the whistleblower was given the information that comprises the contents of his complaint from Bolton himself, which if true would constitute an extraordinary breach of national security and an indictable offense punishable by imprisonment.
“It’s go time,” he began those conversations, multiple sources tell The Chronicle, as if to suggest that Bolton’s patience with the President had worn thin, and even implying later in more than one conversation that a faction of neo-conservatives at the Central Intelligence Agency was ready to remove the President from office.
If true Bolton won't be laughing for long
The agencies transcend party. -
Bolton is gonna end up Clinton’d.
This is Homeland type bullshit. Take the L and move on.
Find better candidates too. -
This Bolton shit is over shadowing the defense but there isnt much to defend quite honestly
Pussy fucks like Romney take the bait
The Democrats problem is that Bolton testimony costs them Biden
