The truth must be told.
Comments
-
We are never going to have a full stock of dudes like these teams athletically. We could have a lot of first teamers that fit the bill though. We are going to need a generational talent at an most likely though and it’s possible. Not saying Huard is that guy so don’t twist.
That being said we made a stupid hire at oc so none of this matters. -
So you're agreeing with me.AtomicDawg said:We are never going to have a full stock of dudes like these teams athletically. We could have a lot of first teamers that fit the bill though. We are going to need a generational talent at an most likely though and it’s possible. Not saying Huard is that guy so don’t twist.
That being said we made a stupid hire at oc so none of this matters. -
We could have a defense as good as either of these teams. We nearly did in 2016 and within a couple years we could have a comparable group, especially if we get some better edge pressure (Latu, Smalls, Tryon, etc.). Not quite the depth as has been pointed out.
On the offensive side it's probably a different story. Just because each team has a generational talent at QB plus insane RBs, and WRs.
UW's ceiling is probably getting to this game and losing by 14-17 points. -
I'm not convinced there are enuf coffee cups in the world to make a difference.MikeDamone said:
Or just do what it takesDoubleJDawg said:
Do it the right way “aggressively”MikeDamone said:
And do it the "right way"DoubleJDawg said:It’s easier to understand when you take a step back or walk for perspective and observe there is no one in the entire university, AD, or football program who really aspires to be in the playoff or winning a natty
We’ve heard this directly from Cohen and Peterman, but even our hallowed cocky Lake made sure to reference winning a “Pac-12 championship” as more meaningful than landing big recruiting classes. They believe in a natty so little (and believe their fan base doesn’t either) they don’t even blow sunshine up our asses about it -
We could have a team close to this athletically in our footprint ifMikeDamone said:
So you're agreeing with me.AtomicDawg said:We are never going to have a full stock of dudes like these teams athletically. We could have a lot of first teamers that fit the bill though. We are going to need a generational talent at an most likely though and it’s possible. Not saying Huard is that guy so don’t twist.
That being said we made a stupid hire at oc so none of this matters.
1) We prioritized recruiting AND coaching in all of our position coaches
2) We included transfers in our recruitment strategy - at any position at any time
3) We played the best players based on ability (not practice kiss-ass-ery) regardless of class and let them development- and ran off the shit players to be replaced with new ones
So basically no margin for error, and in other words Damone is right -
McMillian, Odunze, Egbuka and Franklin (if you can get the latter two) would be a receiving core on the level of what you're watching tonight.Kingdome_Urinals said:We could have a defense as good as either of these teams. We nearly did in 2016 and within a couple years we could have a comparable group, especially if we get some better edge pressure (Latu, Smalls, Tryon, etc.). Not quite the depth as has been pointed out.
On the offensive side it's probably a different story. Just because each team has a generational talent at QB plus insane RBs, and WRs.
UW's ceiling is probably getting to this game and losing by 14-17 points.
And we have the potential generational QB coming in.
It's not at all impossible from where we are, especially considering we have actual pass rushers in the depth going forward.
That's why the OC hire was such a disaster. -
"Could. Nearly. Couple of years. Comparable. If. Not quite. Different. Generational. "Kingdome_Urinals said:We could have a defense as good as either of these teams. We nearly did in 2016 and within a couple years we could have a comparable group, especially if we get some better edge pressure (Latu, Smalls, Tryon, etc.). Not quite the depth as has been pointed out.
On the offensive side it's probably a different story. Just because each team has a generational talent at QB plus insane RBs, and WRs.
UW's ceiling is probably getting to this game and losing by 14-17 points.
You serious Clark? -
Each of these defenses tonight are good to give up 40+ points. Nobody is throwing a shutout. UW can give up 40 just as well as anyone.MikeDamone said:
"Could. Nearly. Couple of years. Comparable. If. Not quite. Different. Generational. "Kingdome_Urinals said:We could have a defense as good as either of these teams. We nearly did in 2016 and within a couple years we could have a comparable group, especially if we get some better edge pressure (Latu, Smalls, Tryon, etc.). Not quite the depth as has been pointed out.
On the offensive side it's probably a different story. Just because each team has a generational talent at QB plus insane RBs, and WRs.
UW's ceiling is probably getting to this game and losing by 14-17 points.
You serious Clark? -
We won't have a QB as good as either of these guys however.MikeDamone said:
"Could. Nearly. Couple of years. Comparable. If. Not quite. Different. Generational. "Kingdome_Urinals said:We could have a defense as good as either of these teams. We nearly did in 2016 and within a couple years we could have a comparable group, especially if we get some better edge pressure (Latu, Smalls, Tryon, etc.). Not quite the depth as has been pointed out.
On the offensive side it's probably a different story. Just because each team has a generational talent at QB plus insane RBs, and WRs.
UW's ceiling is probably getting to this game and losing by 14-17 points.
You serious Clark? -
I know you’re not dumb but you like to portray yourself that way for some reason. The logicial conclusion would be to look at clemsons team with Watson. That is attainable and explains the very team that myself and others are describing.AtomicDawg said:We are never going to have a full stock of dudes like these teams athletically. We could have a lot of first teamers that fit the bill though. We are going to need a generational talent at an most likely though and it’s possible. Not saying Huard is that guy so don’t twist.
That being said we made a stupid hire at oc so none of this matters.
Dig deeper.
