Ahmed was a 2 for me since he massively underwhelmed. I suppose he deserved a 3 on the basis of how he performed but he was supposed to be a super stud and wasn’t.
Harris I gave a 3 because I thought he regressed some this year, but he probably deserved a 4.
Harris at a 3 is a profoundly stupid rating. w/ respect
Adams was 5 his true sophomore season, but his senior year he was just a 3. Let’s be objective. Nick Harris also got some AA love. So he should get a 5 ranking. AJ had a solid career, with no mess ups
He’s not a 5 star. Good, but not great. A solid 4.
If you hated Myles Bryant in 2016, you’re a moron. TBS obsession. If he’s a scholarship player with 4 stars or probably even 3, nobody ever thinks he sucks. I remember him and BBK getting singled out for the ASU game in 2017 when our offense completely shit the bed. Missing a tackle on N’Keal Harry does not make one a shitty player.
Ahmed was a 2 for me since he massively underwhelmed. I suppose he deserved a 3 on the basis of how he performed but he was supposed to be a super stud and wasn’t.
Harris I gave a 3 because I thought he regressed some this year, but he probably deserved a 4.
Strange criteria. Most of us try to come up with an objective way of grading. You seem to take the opposite approach.
Mine is something like:
*...never played or played, played in significantly, or was a total liability. A * rating means a wasted scholarship.
**...played a decent amount but poorly. A ** rating means the player contributed as a warm body needed to fill a spot, but was a liability. Its still a contribution.
***...played a lot and generally not a liability. A *** player probably wasnt very good and took heat from critics, but was good enough to keep trotting out there. This can also be someone who sat most of their career but finally made somewhat of a splash at some point, usually at the end.
****...Multi year starter that, in my best estimation was good enough to start on a good team. At least in the conversation for all Pac 12. A team full of **** would be good enough to win the conference.
*****...Great player and in the conversation for AA. Dominant, not just good, for at least one season.
Something like that. Ahmed, for example, was an excellent backup to Gaskin who averaged about 6ypc for two years and put up 1000 yards as the primary starter. I dont see how he's not **** even with his obvious shortcomings. 1000 yards is 1000 yards.
I think I confused Roberts and Hilbers in giving Roberts a 3. Meaning I think I attributed some of the stuff Hilbers did well to Roberts. Still, I can’t see Roberts lower than a 2 as a part-time player for multiple years.
Your reaction to my post has me shaking and vomiting and when I off myself in a customized recruitment video, know that my life is pathetic and this is all I have going for me. Also know you will literally see purple and gold shoot out of the veins on my left wrist.
Your reaction to my post has me shaking and vomiting and when I off myself in a customized recruitment video, know that my life is pathetic and this is all I have going for me. Also know you will literally see purple and gold shoot out of the veins on my left wrist.
Your reaction to my post has me shaking and vomiting and when I off myself in a customized recruitment video, know that my life is pathetic and this is all I have going for me. Also know you will literally see purple and gold shoot out of the veins on my left wrist.
That list is hideous. Lots of dead weight. If you were building a starting roster from the 85 scholarship players to start the year there are maybe 4 on this list.
I stand by my ratings of both Opera & Fuller as 1s.
Fuller might have been a 2, but gets a point deducted for getting tackled on a PR by a fucking D-Lineman.
Andre could have had 2x the yardage he did and he’s still lucky to get a fucking 1 instead of a 0 for running full speed and jumping the fuck out of bounds in the end zone.
Good luck to both of them in their future endeavors, but I don’t know if there’s anyone else in Husky history that competes with them for the level of happiness/excitement I have for them being gone.
I got named in in my Trey Adams and Myles Bryant ranking.
1 you are totally worthless or never played....2 you played but sucked. 3 you are a guy and played fine 4 you were pretty damn good and going to the league. 5 you can sleep with my wife.
My reason for a 3 with Adams....when he was out we never seemed to miss him. Bryant was bordering on 4 but to me he seemed to disappear this year. Hence a 3.
Fuller as a 1 is incredibly FS. I know these are personal rankings, but that is not objective. He had 874 yards his junior year. He was the best player on our team against Auburn. I get being frustrated by him, but he’s an easy 3.
Baccallia played too much to be a 1. He had over 100 yards in the Rose Bowl. He sucked but that is no 1.
Fuller as a 1 is incredibly FS. I know these are personal rankings, but that is not objective. He had 874 yards his junior year. He was the best player on our team against Auburn. I get being frustrated by him, but he’s an easy 3.
Baccallia played too much to be a 1. He had over 100 yards in the Rose Bowl. He sucked but that is no 1.
I think I gave Bachellia a 3 because he was used better in 2018 and I only remember him and Hunter doing anything during the last quarter of the season in the passing game.
This year he was used like a true #2 deep threat/possession receiver for some reason. His only good plays came against mountain west teams and Arizona.
Fuller as a 1 is incredibly FS. I know these are personal rankings, but that is not objective. He had 874 yards his junior year. He was the best player on our team against Auburn. I get being frustrated by him, but he’s an easy 3.
Baccallia played too much to be a 1. He had over 100 yards in the Rose Bowl. He sucked but that is no 1.
Fuller had a good game against a very young secondary with other guys drawing more attention.
He would have been a 2 but AGAIN got tackled from behind on a Punt Return he should have housed by clearly coasting.
If giving Andre a 0 was possible, that’s what I’d have given him. As a Senior - here’s Andre as a most of the time starter vs the conference
Cal - 3/27 and jumped out of bounds while WIDE FUCKING OPEN SC - 2/13 Stanford - 1/1 Zona - 0/0 Oregon- 1/5/1 Utah - 0/0 OSU - 0/0 CU - 2/10 WSU - 0/0
9 catches, 56 yards, 1 TD
To quote the great Homer J Simpson
Aaron + Andre = The suckiest bunch of sucks who ever sucked
Your reaction to my post has me shaking and vomiting and when I off myself in a customized recruitment video, know that my life is pathetic and this is all I have going for me. Also know you will literally see purple and gold shoot out of the veins on my left wrist.
Now ask yourself why?
Cause I quit taking my meds.
one word of advice, cut along the tracks, not across them
Jared Hilbers – 3.21 (+0.21 from HS ranking) – really good showing for Hilbers who put in a solid 2 years at tackle and has an outside shot at getting drafted (per Dane Brugler). Lots of 3s and 4s in his ratings but @theknowledge gave him a 1. Did he steal your girlfriend or something?
Shit, I meant to rate Hilbers a 3. If I could have he would be a 3.5. He was a good player for us. Definitely outplayed his ranking.
Oh, and TYFYS. I love seeing the results of this every year.
Your reaction to my post has me shaking and vomiting and when I off myself in a customized recruitment video, know that my life is pathetic and this is all I have going for me. Also know you will literally see purple and gold shoot out of the veins on my left wrist.
Now ask yourself why?
Cause I quit taking my meds.
one word of advice, cut along the tracks, not across them </p>
Comments
Mine is something like:
*...never played or played, played in significantly, or was a total liability. A * rating means a wasted scholarship.
**...played a decent amount but poorly. A ** rating means the player contributed as a warm body needed to fill a spot, but was a liability. Its still a contribution.
***...played a lot and generally not a liability. A *** player probably wasnt very good and took heat from critics, but was good enough to keep trotting out there. This can also be someone who sat most of their career but finally made somewhat of a splash at some point, usually at the end.
****...Multi year starter that, in my best estimation was good enough to start on a good team. At least in the conversation for all Pac 12. A team full of **** would be good enough to win the conference.
*****...Great player and in the conversation for AA. Dominant, not just good, for at least one season.
Something like that. Ahmed, for example, was an excellent backup to Gaskin who averaged about 6ypc for two years and put up 1000 yards as the primary starter. I dont see how he's not **** even with his obvious shortcomings. 1000 yards is 1000 yards.
Still, I can’t see Roberts lower than a 2 as a part-time player for multiple years.
Your reaction to my post has me shaking and vomiting and when I off myself in a customized recruitment video, know that my life is pathetic and this is all I have going for me. Also know you will literally see purple and gold shoot out of the veins on my left wrist.
I stand by my ratings of both Opera & Fuller as 1s.
Fuller might have been a 2, but gets a point deducted for getting tackled on a PR by a fucking D-Lineman.
Andre could have had 2x the yardage he did and he’s still lucky to get a fucking 1 instead of a 0 for running full speed and jumping the fuck out of bounds in the end zone.
Good luck to both of them in their future endeavors, but I don’t know if there’s anyone else in Husky history that competes with them for the level of happiness/excitement I have for them being gone.
1 you are totally worthless or never played....2 you played but sucked. 3 you are a guy and played fine 4 you were pretty damn good and going to the league. 5 you can sleep with my wife.
My reason for a 3 with Adams....when he was out we never seemed to miss him. Bryant was bordering on 4 but to me he seemed to disappear this year. Hence a 3.
Baccallia played too much to be a 1. He had over 100 yards in the Rose Bowl. He sucked but that is no 1.
This year he was used like a true #2 deep threat/possession receiver for some reason. His only good plays came against mountain west teams and Arizona.
He would have been a 2 but AGAIN got tackled from behind on a Punt Return he should have housed by clearly coasting.
If giving Andre a 0 was possible, that’s what I’d have given him. As a Senior - here’s Andre as a most of the time starter vs the conference
Cal - 3/27 and jumped out of bounds while WIDE FUCKING OPEN
SC - 2/13
Stanford - 1/1
Zona - 0/0
Oregon- 1/5/1
Utah - 0/0
OSU - 0/0
CU - 2/10
WSU - 0/0
9 catches, 56 yards, 1 TD
To quote the great Homer J Simpson
Aaron + Andre = The suckiest bunch of sucks who ever sucked
Shit, I meant to rate Hilbers a 3. If I could have he would be a 3.5. He was a good player for us. Definitely outplayed his ranking.
Oh, and TYFYS.
I love seeing the results of this every year.