Christianity Today Editor-in-Chief Who Called for Trump’s Removal Is Now Looking for a New Job

DJDuck

A very biblical ending.

After 30 years at Christianity Today — culminating in picking a fight with the President of the United States and angering Evangelicals in the process — the editor is now leaving the publication.


https://truepundit.com/christianity-today-editor-in-chief-who-called-for-trumps-removal-is-now-looking-for-a-new-job/

HHusky

“But the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.

The reason many are not shocked about this is that this president has dumbed down the idea of morality in his administration. He has hired and fired a number of people who are now convicted criminals. He himself has admitted to immoral actions in business and his relationship with women, about which he remains proud. His Twitter feed alone—with its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders—is a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused.”

Sledog

TDS is wide ranging and not limited to the CDbros.

It seems to hit those with mental problems.

HHusky

Sledog said:

TDS is wide ranging and not limited to the CDbros.

It seems to hit those with mental problems.

I’m outraged at your characterization of Christians.

WestlinnDuck

Pelosi prays for Trump. Probably called her Bishop for an exorcism. You suck at this.

Sledog

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

TDS is wide ranging and not limited to the CDbros.

It seems to hit those with mental problems.

I’m outraged at your characterization of Christians.

I wasn't.

I was characterizing you.

HHusky

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

TDS is wide ranging and not limited to the CDbros.

It seems to hit those with mental problems.

I’m outraged at your characterization of Christians.

I wasn't.

I was characterizing you.

Ouch!

DJDuck

HHusky said:

“But the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.

The reason many are not shocked about this is that this president has dumbed down the idea of morality in his administration. He has hired and fired a number of people who are now convicted criminals. He himself has admitted to immoral actions in business and his relationship with women, about which he remains proud. His Twitter feed alone—with its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders—is a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused.”

HHusky said:

“But the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.

The reason many are not shocked about this is that this president has dumbed down the idea of morality in his administration. He has hired and fired a number of people who are now convicted criminals. He himself has admitted to immoral actions in business and his relationship with women, about which he remains proud. His Twitter feed alone—with its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders—is a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused.”

So quoting a Christian whackos opinion is meant to add what to the conversation? It is similar to all the great hearsay evidence that the cretin Dems presented that meant absolutely nothing. Interesting to see you quote Christians. Well this “Christian is out of a job for the bullshit he wrote.😂😂😂😂

The fact you think you know the motives of other people and why “ they are not shocked” is hilariously arrogant. What a moron.

You have no clue. Nothing has changed.

DJDuck

Franklin Graham Slams Christian Magazine For Invoking His Father Over Trump’s Removal

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/franklin-graham-slams-christian-magazine-for-invoking-father-over-trumps-removal/

HHusky

“Trump has granted evangelicals power in exchange for their unwavering support, but the bargain now includes a requirement that they pretend Trump’s wretchedly corrupt subversion of the country’s interests to his own simply isn’t happening, or that it’s absolutely fine.

For some evangelicals, at least, this bargain has crossed over into a species of scam that they can no longer accept.”

-Greg Sargent

DJDuck

Phony analysis as usual. What power has Trump granted Evangelicals.? What are Trump’s “wretched corrupt subversions of the country’s interests to his own”?

As in your case hatred tends to create an already weak mind to even spiral lower into a fog of inane analysis and delusion.

PurpleThrobber

DJDuck said:

Phony analysis as usual. What power has Trump granted Evangelicals.? What are Trump’s “wretched corrupt subversions of the country’s interests to his own”?

As in your case hatred tends to create an already weak mind to even spiral into a fog of inane analysis and delusion.

It's the same 'power' as the 'high crimes and misdemeanors' Trump has committed.

All hat(e), no cattle.

HHusky

DJDuck said:

Phony analysis as usual. What power has Trump granted Evangelicals.? What are Trump’s “wretched corrupt subversions of the country’s interests to his own”?

As in your case hatred tends to create an already weak mind to even spiral into a fog of inane analysis and delusion.

We don’t all have your depth. Sad!

DJDuck

HHusky said:

DJDuck said:

Phony analysis as usual. What power has Trump granted Evangelicals.? What are Trump’s “wretched corrupt subversions of the country’s interests to his own”?

As in your case hatred tends to create an already weak mind to even spiral into a fog of inane analysis and delusion.

We don’t all have your depth. Sad!

Well that’s not quite true either.............YOU DON’T😂

But I thought you could at least answer questions.😂

RaceBannon

HH isn't for sermon seekers H

HHusky

DJDuck said:

HHusky said:

DJDuck said:

Phony analysis as usual. What power has Trump granted Evangelicals.? What are Trump’s “wretched corrupt subversions of the country’s interests to his own”?

As in your case hatred tends to create an already weak mind to even spiral into a fog of inane analysis and delusion.

We don’t all have your depth. Sad!

Well that’s not quite true either.............YOU DON’T😂

PurpleThrobber said:

DJDuck said:

Phony analysis as usual. What power has Trump granted Evangelicals.? What are Trump’s “wretched corrupt subversions of the country’s interests to his own”?

As in your case hatred tends to create an already weak mind to even spiral into a fog of inane analysis and delusion.

It's the same 'power' as the 'high crimes and misdemeanors' Trump has committed.

All hat(e), no cattle.

Kind of amusing given your team’s celebration of judicial appointments, to cite but one example. I do like it when you girls play dumb though.

Sledog

PurpleThrobber said:

DJDuck said:

Phony analysis as usual. What power has Trump granted Evangelicals.? What are Trump’s “wretched corrupt subversions of the country’s interests to his own”?

As in your case hatred tends to create an already weak mind to even spiral into a fog of inane analysis and delusion.

It's the same 'power' as the 'high crimes and misdemeanors' Trump has committed.

All hat(e), no cattle.

That ding doesn't even have the hat!

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HH isn't for sermon seekers H

Still, evangelicals might consider:

For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

Not sure, but I think Oprah may have said that.

Sledog

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HH isn't for sermon seekers H

Still, evangelicals might consider:

For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

Not sure, but I think Oprah may have said that.

You would watch Oprah.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HH isn't for sermon seekers H

Still, evangelicals might consider:

For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

Not sure, but I think Oprah may have said that.

Which Democrat best represents evangelical Christians?

What else that Christianity Today advocates should we make public policy?

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HH isn't for sermon seekers H

Still, evangelicals might consider:

For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

Not sure, but I think Oprah may have said that.

Which Democrat best represents evangelical Christians?

What else that Christianity Today advocates should we make public policy?

The ends justifies the means theology.

False choice. You moral cowards just won’t cut bait with Daddy. You Republicans have multiple evangelicals you could run.