Apparently, there's a gay NFL player...
Comments
-
You're pressing. Stop.Passion said:
Here is what I said about you above: "I don't know you, but I highly doubt by your comments that you're a racist, or right-wing religious wacko. You're probably like a lot of my republican friends - claiming to be republican because of economic & budgetary issues, but probably a social moderate in that you don't get caught up in a lot of the far right's blather on minorities, immigrants, gays and guns. Again, just my guess."
Is that a stereotype? Actually, it seems like I gave you the benefit of the doubt, without knowing you. But if you want to play the victim that gets picked on by the mean and nasty liberals, then go ahead.
Countdown to Damone snarky comment with no value in 3...2...1 -
And there it is - the snarky comment from the guy that ads nothing, but merely impresses himself with his own wit.MikeDamone said:
You're pressing. Stop.Passion said:
Here is what I said about you above: "I don't know you, but I highly doubt by your comments that you're a racist, or right-wing religious wacko. You're probably like a lot of my republican friends - claiming to be republican because of economic & budgetary issues, but probably a social moderate in that you don't get caught up in a lot of the far right's blather on minorities, immigrants, gays and guns. Again, just my guess."
Is that a stereotype? Actually, it seems like I gave you the benefit of the doubt, without knowing you. But if you want to play the victim that gets picked on by the mean and nasty liberals, then go ahead.
Countdown to Damone snarky comment with no value in 3...2...1
Get over yourself, pal. You're not that smart. -
Pal? Listen, fella, I might be only 5% as creative as Race, but say I'm not smart and "ad" nothing is just you trying to be hurtful. Now go read some macroeconomics 101 and post when you have basic understanding of the subject.Passion said:
And there it is - the snarky comment from the guy that ads nothing, but merely impresses himself with his own wit.MikeDamone said:
You're pressing. Stop.Passion said:
Here is what I said about you above: "I don't know you, but I highly doubt by your comments that you're a racist, or right-wing religious wacko. You're probably like a lot of my republican friends - claiming to be republican because of economic & budgetary issues, but probably a social moderate in that you don't get caught up in a lot of the far right's blather on minorities, immigrants, gays and guns. Again, just my guess."
Is that a stereotype? Actually, it seems like I gave you the benefit of the doubt, without knowing you. But if you want to play the victim that gets picked on by the mean and nasty liberals, then go ahead.
Countdown to Damone snarky comment with no value in 3...2...1
Get over yourself, pal. You're not that smart.
And I said GOOD DAY SIR!
-
MikeDamone said:
Adam Carolla's presence inhabits this boredPassion said:
And I said GOOD DAY SIR! -
I don't need my 30-round magazines, however, it is a right that's guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment. When people start to realize it's a right and not a want or a need, we'll have better understanding of the problem.Passion said:
The only views I don't agree with are those that involve discrimination and a refusal to compromise. That's it.MikeDamone said:I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we are fucked. We are getting close.
Culture matters.
Promising more stuff from the government? Sheesh. Such a load of bull. You actually think that Democrats want people to be unemployed and on welfare? Now you're just listening to Fox News way more than a healthy person should. It's ridiculous. If that's the case, then why does Obama celebrate when the unemployment rate goes down? More takers than payers? Now you're on the verge of losing touch with reality.
The problem is that republicans in Congress don't want to work with him & compromise because they don't want him to be viewed as successful. In many of their congressional districts, it makes more sense to simply say "NO" than to actually be a constructive problem solver.
Culture matters? What the hell does that mean?
By the way, if you have another name for people that think high-capacity 30-clip magazines are necessary, please let me know. I come from a family of hunters, and we've never felt the need to empty 30 bullets into a deer in rapid succession.
If the question starts to become "why do you need or want something?" we're fucked.
Why do people do need spinners on their cars when they can ride a bicycle instead?
Why do people do need to go to football games and create all those green house emmissions?
Why do people do need a 24-pack of PBR, I've never felt the need to empty 24 cans of great beer in rapid succession? -
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I don't need my 30-round magazines, however, it is a right that's guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment. When people start to realize it's a right and not a want or a need, we'll have better understanding of the problem.Passion said:
The only views I don't agree with are those that involve discrimination and a refusal to compromise. That's it.MikeDamone said:I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we are fucked. We are getting close.
Culture matters.
Promising more stuff from the government? Sheesh. Such a load of bull. You actually think that Democrats want people to be unemployed and on welfare? Now you're just listening to Fox News way more than a healthy person should. It's ridiculous. If that's the case, then why does Obama celebrate when the unemployment rate goes down? More takers than payers? Now you're on the verge of losing touch with reality.
The problem is that republicans in Congress don't want to work with him & compromise because they don't want him to be viewed as successful. In many of their congressional districts, it makes more sense to simply say "NO" than to actually be a constructive problem solver.
Culture matters? What the hell does that mean?
By the way, if you have another name for people that think high-capacity 30-clip magazines are necessary, please let me know. I come from a family of hunters, and we've never felt the need to empty 30 bullets into a deer in rapid succession.
If the question starts to become "why do you need or want something?" we're fucked.
Why do people do need spinners on their cars when they can ride a bicycle instead?
Why do people do need to go to football games and create all those green house emmissions?
Why do people do need a 24-pack of PBR, I've never felt the need to empty 24 cans of great beer in rapid succession?
El. Oh. El.
-
Fancy Beer Superiority Guy?TierbsHsotBoobs said:CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I don't need my 30-round magazines, however, it is a right that's guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment. When people start to realize it's a right and not a want or a need, we'll have better understanding of the problem.Passion said:
The only views I don't agree with are those that involve discrimination and a refusal to compromise. That's it.MikeDamone said:I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we are fucked. We are getting close.
Culture matters.
Promising more stuff from the government? Sheesh. Such a load of bull. You actually think that Democrats want people to be unemployed and on welfare? Now you're just listening to Fox News way more than a healthy person should. It's ridiculous. If that's the case, then why does Obama celebrate when the unemployment rate goes down? More takers than payers? Now you're on the verge of losing touch with reality.
The problem is that republicans in Congress don't want to work with him & compromise because they don't want him to be viewed as successful. In many of their congressional districts, it makes more sense to simply say "NO" than to actually be a constructive problem solver.
Culture matters? What the hell does that mean?
By the way, if you have another name for people that think high-capacity 30-clip magazines are necessary, please let me know. I come from a family of hunters, and we've never felt the need to empty 30 bullets into a deer in rapid succession.
If the question starts to become "why do you need or want something?" we're fucked.
Why do people do need spinners on their cars when they can ride a bicycle instead?
Why do people do need to go to football games and create all those green house emmissions?
Why do people do need a 24-pack of PBR, I've never felt the need to empty 24 cans of great beer in rapid succession?
El. Oh. El. -
You actually believe the founding fathers envisioned 30-round magazines when they wrote the 2nd amendment? And you're comparing 30-round magazines to beer?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I don't need my 30-round magazines, however, it is a right that's guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment. When people start to realize it's a right and not a want or a need, we'll have better understanding of the problem.Passion said:
The only views I don't agree with are those that involve discrimination and a refusal to compromise. That's it.MikeDamone said:I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we are fucked. We are getting close.
Culture matters.
Promising more stuff from the government? Sheesh. Such a load of bull. You actually think that Democrats want people to be unemployed and on welfare? Now you're just listening to Fox News way more than a healthy person should. It's ridiculous. If that's the case, then why does Obama celebrate when the unemployment rate goes down? More takers than payers? Now you're on the verge of losing touch with reality.
The problem is that republicans in Congress don't want to work with him & compromise because they don't want him to be viewed as successful. In many of their congressional districts, it makes more sense to simply say "NO" than to actually be a constructive problem solver.
Culture matters? What the hell does that mean?
By the way, if you have another name for people that think high-capacity 30-clip magazines are necessary, please let me know. I come from a family of hunters, and we've never felt the need to empty 30 bullets into a deer in rapid succession.
If the question starts to become "why do you need or want something?" we're fucked.
Why do people do need spinners on their cars when they can ride a bicycle instead?
Why do people do need to go to football games and create all those green house emmissions?
Why do people do need a 24-pack of PBR, I've never felt the need to empty 24 cans of great beer in rapid succession?
And people wonder why Washington, DC is in gridlock. People can't even agree on what is "common sense." -
It doesn't matter what "the founding fathers envisioned". It matters what was WRITTEN.Passion said:
You actually believe the founding fathers envisioned 30-round magazines when they wrote the 2nd amendment? And you're comparing 30-round magazines to beer?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I don't need my 30-round magazines, however, it is a right that's guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment. When people start to realize it's a right and not a want or a need, we'll have better understanding of the problem.Passion said:
The only views I don't agree with are those that involve discrimination and a refusal to compromise. That's it.MikeDamone said:I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we are fucked. We are getting close.
Culture matters.
Promising more stuff from the government? Sheesh. Such a load of bull. You actually think that Democrats want people to be unemployed and on welfare? Now you're just listening to Fox News way more than a healthy person should. It's ridiculous. If that's the case, then why does Obama celebrate when the unemployment rate goes down? More takers than payers? Now you're on the verge of losing touch with reality.
The problem is that republicans in Congress don't want to work with him & compromise because they don't want him to be viewed as successful. In many of their congressional districts, it makes more sense to simply say "NO" than to actually be a constructive problem solver.
Culture matters? What the hell does that mean?
By the way, if you have another name for people that think high-capacity 30-clip magazines are necessary, please let me know. I come from a family of hunters, and we've never felt the need to empty 30 bullets into a deer in rapid succession.
If the question starts to become "why do you need or want something?" we're fucked.
Why do people do need spinners on their cars when they can ride a bicycle instead?
Why do people do need to go to football games and create all those green house emmissions?
Why do people do need a 24-pack of PBR, I've never felt the need to empty 24 cans of great beer in rapid succession?
And people wonder why Washington, DC is in gridlock. People can't even agree on what is "common sense."
Now...I'll just call myself Strict Constructionist Constitution Superiority Guy and I'll be on my way. -
Sounds like your version of "common sense" is what you want to enforce on everyone else. Seems like what the Christians do.Passion said:
You actually believe the founding fathers envisioned 30-round magazines when they wrote the 2nd amendment? And you're comparing 30-round magazines to beer?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I don't need my 30-round magazines, however, it is a right that's guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment. When people start to realize it's a right and not a want or a need, we'll have better understanding of the problem.Passion said:
The only views I don't agree with are those that involve discrimination and a refusal to compromise. That's it.MikeDamone said:I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we are fucked. We are getting close.
Culture matters.
Promising more stuff from the government? Sheesh. Such a load of bull. You actually think that Democrats want people to be unemployed and on welfare? Now you're just listening to Fox News way more than a healthy person should. It's ridiculous. If that's the case, then why does Obama celebrate when the unemployment rate goes down? More takers than payers? Now you're on the verge of losing touch with reality.
The problem is that republicans in Congress don't want to work with him & compromise because they don't want him to be viewed as successful. In many of their congressional districts, it makes more sense to simply say "NO" than to actually be a constructive problem solver.
Culture matters? What the hell does that mean?
By the way, if you have another name for people that think high-capacity 30-clip magazines are necessary, please let me know. I come from a family of hunters, and we've never felt the need to empty 30 bullets into a deer in rapid succession.
If the question starts to become "why do you need or want something?" we're fucked.
Why do people do need spinners on their cars when they can ride a bicycle instead?
Why do people do need to go to football games and create all those green house emmissions?
Why do people do need a 24-pack of PBR, I've never felt the need to empty 24 cans of great beer in rapid succession?
And people wonder why Washington, DC is in gridlock. People can't even agree on what is "common sense."
