Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Apparently, there's a gay NFL player...
Comments
-
Keep putting word in bold and you're gone.
-
Some of you won't be missed
-
Can someone please move this shit to Unleashed where it belongs?
-
Yep, classic libtard move. When debating, classify your opponent as a racist or nazi within 3 moves.DerekJohnson said:Once Passion and Damone started going back and forth in earnest, it was inevitable that Godwin's Law would be enacted.
Quite the economics expert that Passion is.
-
Damone - Please find where I called you a "racist or nazi." In contrast, your "libtard" comment would classify as the first shot in a name-calling war.MikeDamone said:
Yep, classic libtard move. When debating, classify your opponent as a racist or nazi within 3 moves.DerekJohnson said:Once Passion and Damone started going back and forth in earnest, it was inevitable that Godwin's Law would be enacted.
Quite the economics expert that Passion is.
I don't know you, but I highly doubt by your comments that you're a racist, or right-wing religious wacko. You're probably like a lot of my republican friends - claiming to be republican because of economic & budgetary issues, but probably a social moderate in that you don't get caught up in a lot of the far right's blather on minorities, immigrants, gays and guns. Again, just my guess.
My problem with you is that you are unwilling to admit that: 1) there are a lot of racist, sexist & homphobic people in the republican party (though not you or people you associate with); and 2) the republican party is in the midst of a civil war, trying to define itself. Will it go toward the tea party, or will it cut the wackos loose and actually join the 21st century.
Blaming the "liberal media" will get you (and the republican party) nowhere. Your efforts should be geared toward nominating candidates that won't alienate everyone except old white men and the women they subjugate. -
You labeled those with Paul Ryan economic philosophies the gestapo (i.e. Nazi).Passion said:
Damone - Please find where I called you a "racist or nazi." In contrast, your "libtard" comment would classify as the first shot in a name-calling war.MikeDamone said:
Yep, classic libtard move. When debating, classify your opponent as a racist or nazi within 3 moves.DerekJohnson said:Once Passion and Damone started going back and forth in earnest, it was inevitable that Godwin's Law would be enacted.
Quite the economics expert that Passion is.
I don't know you, but I highly doubt by your comments that you're a racist, or right-wing religious wacko. You're probably like a lot of my republican friends - claiming to be republican because of economic & budgetary issues, but probably a social moderate in that you don't get caught up in a lot of the far right's blather on minorities, immigrants, gays and guns. Again, just my guess.
My problem with you is that you are unwilling to admit that: 1) there are a lot of racist, sexist & homphobic people in the republican party (though not you or people you associate with); and 2) the republican party is in the midst of a civil war, trying to define itself. Will it go toward the tea party, or will it cut the wackos loose and actually join the 21st century.
Blaming the "liberal media" will get you (and the republican party) nowhere. Your efforts should be geared toward nominating candidates that won't alienate everyone except old white men and the women they subjugate.
Hope that helps.
-
Nope. Doesn't help. Don't see Damone's name in that group. Thanks for trying.
How about the rest of my post, or are 2 sentences your limit? -
I explained to you his comment about the name calling. Perhaps if Damone took it as you calling him the gestapo, this should indicate he thinks Ryan is right economically?Passion said:Nope. Doesn't help. Don't see Damone's name in that group. Thanks for trying.
How about the rest of my post, or are 2 sentences your limit?
As for the rest of your post it looks pretty geared at Damone specifically. I'm not particularly interested in your little fight. I do think labeling Paul Ryan and those like him the gestapo does nothing but take away from your argument.
-
I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we, as a nation, are fucked. We are getting close.
The problem I have with you is you won't admit that real and damaging racism comes from the left. They've created a whole paradigm where minorities need to be protected from the big bad rich white man. Let the "good" white people protect you. We know you're not capable of doing it yourself. And oh, if your a successful minority in the Republican Party, you are a sell out, Uncle Tom, trader, etc. Mia Love, Condi Rice, Bobby Jindahl, Marco Rubio, all racists.
Now lets get back to talking about a how bad all conservatives are because a guy from Alaska said wetback. That sells better and keeps the minorities in check.
Culture matters. -
The only views I don't agree with are those that involve discrimination and a refusal to compromise. That's it.MikeDamone said:I'm not a republican. HTH. And yes, referring to someone as a nazi when trying to make a point is what you did, hence, the Ghodwins law comment.
Like I said, it's the classic liberal tactic. Calling people racists, idiots, red necks, wackos, gun nuts, using gestapo tactics, etc rather than addressing issues and problem solving. The left is very intolerant of other peoples point of view and beliefs they don't agree with.
The republicans certainly have a message problem. It's going to be an uphill battle for them going against a party that promises more and more stuff from the government. When their are more takers than payers, we are fucked. We are getting close.
Culture matters.
Promising more stuff from the government? Sheesh. Such a load of bull. You actually think that Democrats want people to be unemployed and on welfare? Now you're just listening to Fox News way more than a healthy person should. It's ridiculous. If that's the case, then why does Obama celebrate when the unemployment rate goes down? More takers than payers? Now you're on the verge of losing touch with reality.
The problem is that republicans in Congress don't want to work with him & compromise because they don't want him to be viewed as successful. In many of their congressional districts, it makes more sense to simply say "NO" than to actually be a constructive problem solver.
Culture matters? What the hell does that mean?
By the way, if you have another name for people that think high-capacity 30-clip magazines are necessary, please let me know. I come from a family of hunters, and we've never felt the need to empty 30 bullets into a deer in rapid succession.
