Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Schiff Show is wowing the public

1234689

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?
    Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?
    Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?
    So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    To dignify the charade? No thank you.


    And fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?
    Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?
    So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.
    So you're saying you're a strawman ass fucker that needs a punch in the face?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    Hillary has Hondo working overtim today.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?
    Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?
    So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.
    So you're saying you're a strawman ass fucker that needs a punch in the face?
    Come meet me at the 7/11 in liberty lake and say that to my face.

    Nice white flag otherwise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,435 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?

    Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.

    Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
    The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?
    Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.

    Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.

    Reminds of you.

    Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
    Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.

    Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
    Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.


    And fuck off.
    Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?
    Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?
    So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.
    So you're saying you're a strawman ass fucker that needs a punch in the face?
    Come meet me at the 7/11 in liberty lake and say that to my face.

    Nice white flag otherwise.
    Melt down
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    It's threads like these that make me wonder why I spend $20.81/mo.

    @DerekJohnson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter