Schiff Show is wowing the public
Comments
-
CNN Poll: No change in views on impeachment after public hearings
Number of Americans supporting Trump's impeachment and removal unchanged by hearings, poll finds
William Cummings
USA TODAY
More reading, less Hondo cocksucking.
-
It dropping among moderates. Panic in the DNC
-
Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence, a prominent supporter of Kamala Harris who has previously supported the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, abruptly announced Sunday that she no longer saw any "value" in the process and called for her fellow Democrats to throw their support behind a symbolic censure resolution.
Lawrence's about-face came as polls have shown that independents are souring on the idea of impeaching and removing Trump from office, including in critical battleground states like Wisconsin, even as House Democrats aggressively presented their focus-group-tested "bribery" case against the president over the past two weeks.
Recent surveys indicate that even Democratic voters are losing interest in impeachment. Meanwhile, 50 percent of independents questioned in an NPR/PBS/Marist poll conducted Nov. 11-15 did not support impeaching and removing Trump from office, with just 42 percent backing such a move. That’s a noticeable dip in support compared with the previous NPR/PBS/Marist poll – conducted the first week in October – when support stood at 45 percent.
And, a Gallup poll conducted the first two weeks of November indicated that 45 percent of independent voters supported impeaching and removing the president – with 53 percent opposing the move. That’s a switch from October, when the previous Gallup survey put the split at 53-44 percent.
Imagine being Schiff's butt boy like @CirrhosisDawg -
I guess there's some sort of news embargo in El Monte.RaceBannon said:Michigan Democratic Rep. Brenda Lawrence, a prominent supporter of Kamala Harris who has previously supported the impeachment inquiry into President Trump, abruptly announced Sunday that she no longer saw any "value" in the process and called for her fellow Democrats to throw their support behind a symbolic censure resolution.
Lawrence's about-face came as polls have shown that independents are souring on the idea of impeaching and removing Trump from office, including in critical battleground states like Wisconsin, even as House Democrats aggressively presented their focus-group-tested "bribery" case against the president over the past two weeks.
Recent surveys indicate that even Democratic voters are losing interest in impeachment. Meanwhile, 50 percent of independents questioned in an NPR/PBS/Marist poll conducted Nov. 11-15 did not support impeaching and removing Trump from office, with just 42 percent backing such a move. That’s a noticeable dip in support compared with the previous NPR/PBS/Marist poll – conducted the first week in October – when support stood at 45 percent.
And, a Gallup poll conducted the first two weeks of November indicated that 45 percent of independent voters supported impeaching and removing the president – with 53 percent opposing the move. That’s a switch from October, when the previous Gallup survey put the split at 53-44 percent.
Imagine being Schiff's butt boy like @CirrhosisDawg -
Imagine believing Fox News and that Brenda Lawrence isn’t going to vote to impeach trump. She confirmed she will today..
Trumptrash is going to trumptrash. It’s scientifically proven. -
Way to miss the newsCirrhosisDawg said:Imagine believing Fox News and that Brenda Lawrence isn’t going to vote to impeach trump. She confirmed she will today..
Trumptrash is going to trumptrash. It’s scientifically proven.
Muellertard
-
Ironic.RaceBannon said:
Way to miss the newsCirrhosisDawg said:Imagine believing Fox News and that Brenda Lawrence isn’t going to vote to impeach trump. She confirmed she will today..
Trumptrash is going to trumptrash. It’s scientifically proven.
Muellertard
-
Lawmakers in the House on Tuesday will kick off a crucial, marathon week of testimony in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
But as investigators look to continue making their case for impeachment to the public, support for the inquiry has ticked down over the past week, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.
The survey, which has tracked support and opposition for the inquiry each week, found that support for the investigation inched down 2 points — to 48 percent from 50 percent — while opposition to the inquiry ticked up 3 points — to 45 percent from 42 percent.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/support-trump-impeachment-inquiry-poll-071396
Imagine swallowing like a bitch and claiming that support for impeachment was increasing. Cocksuckers is going to suck cock. -
You got played again trumptards. Brenda Lawrence supports impeachment. Support for trump’s impeachment has surged to 50% and the articles of impeachment are just days away.
-
There must be a news embargo in Hercules.SFGbob said:Lawmakers in the House on Tuesday will kick off a crucial, marathon week of testimony in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
But as investigators look to continue making their case for impeachment to the public, support for the inquiry has ticked down over the past week, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.
The survey, which has tracked support and opposition for the inquiry each week, found that support for the investigation inched down 2 points — to 48 percent from 50 percent — while opposition to the inquiry ticked up 3 points — to 45 percent from 42 percent.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/support-trump-impeachment-inquiry-poll-071396
Imagine swallowing like a bitch and claiming that support for impeachment was increasing. Cocksuckers is going to suck cock. -
All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
-
Appears someone is researching the source of my IP address. You live a lot closer to El Monte than I do to Hercules Kunt. Now tell us why you swallowed like a bitch the bullshit about support for impeachment increasing?CirrhosisDawg said:
There must be a news embargo in Hercules.SFGbob said:Lawmakers in the House on Tuesday will kick off a crucial, marathon week of testimony in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
But as investigators look to continue making their case for impeachment to the public, support for the inquiry has ticked down over the past week, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.
The survey, which has tracked support and opposition for the inquiry each week, found that support for the investigation inched down 2 points — to 48 percent from 50 percent — while opposition to the inquiry ticked up 3 points — to 45 percent from 42 percent.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/support-trump-impeachment-inquiry-poll-071396
Imagine swallowing like a bitch and claiming that support for impeachment was increasing. Cocksuckers is going to suck cock. -
It’s going to be a great weekend regardless of what happens in the AC. If nothing else, trumptardism is predictable and reliable.SFGbob said:
Appears someone is researching the source of my IP address. You live a lot closer to El Monte than I do to Hercules Kunt. Now tell us why you swallowed like a bitch the bullshit about support for impeachment increasing?CirrhosisDawg said:
There must be a news embargo in Hercules.SFGbob said:Lawmakers in the House on Tuesday will kick off a crucial, marathon week of testimony in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
But as investigators look to continue making their case for impeachment to the public, support for the inquiry has ticked down over the past week, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.
The survey, which has tracked support and opposition for the inquiry each week, found that support for the investigation inched down 2 points — to 48 percent from 50 percent — while opposition to the inquiry ticked up 3 points — to 45 percent from 42 percent.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/support-trump-impeachment-inquiry-poll-071396
Imagine swallowing like a bitch and claiming that support for impeachment was increasing. Cocksuckers is going to suck cock. -
I thought only people who were in San Francisco lived there? No one would commute in from Fremont. Or Hercules.SFGbob said:
Appears someone is researching the source of my IP address. You live a lot closer to El Monte than I do to Hercules Kunt. Now tell us why you swallowed like a bitch the bullshit about support for impeachment increasing?CirrhosisDawg said:
There must be a news embargo in Hercules.SFGbob said:Lawmakers in the House on Tuesday will kick off a crucial, marathon week of testimony in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
But as investigators look to continue making their case for impeachment to the public, support for the inquiry has ticked down over the past week, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.
The survey, which has tracked support and opposition for the inquiry each week, found that support for the investigation inched down 2 points — to 48 percent from 50 percent — while opposition to the inquiry ticked up 3 points — to 45 percent from 42 percent.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/support-trump-impeachment-inquiry-poll-071396
Imagine swallowing like a bitch and claiming that support for impeachment was increasing. Cocksuckers is going to suck cock.
Your lies are getting worse and worse man. Embarrassing. -
Got it, so instead of addressing why you put your head up your ass, you're going with non-response, response.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s going to be a great weekend regardless of what happens in the AC. If nothing else, trumptardism is predictable and reliable.SFGbob said:
Appears someone is researching the source of my IP address. You live a lot closer to El Monte than I do to Hercules Kunt. Now tell us why you swallowed like a bitch the bullshit about support for impeachment increasing?CirrhosisDawg said:
There must be a news embargo in Hercules.SFGbob said:Lawmakers in the House on Tuesday will kick off a crucial, marathon week of testimony in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
But as investigators look to continue making their case for impeachment to the public, support for the inquiry has ticked down over the past week, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.
The survey, which has tracked support and opposition for the inquiry each week, found that support for the investigation inched down 2 points — to 48 percent from 50 percent — while opposition to the inquiry ticked up 3 points — to 45 percent from 42 percent.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/support-trump-impeachment-inquiry-poll-071396
Imagine swallowing like a bitch and claiming that support for impeachment was increasing. Cocksuckers is going to suck cock. -
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you. -
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you. -
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you. -
To dignify the charade? No thank you.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
And fuck off. -
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify. -
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off. -
Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?pawz said:
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off. -
Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?2001400ex said:
Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?pawz said:
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off. -
So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.SFGbob said:
Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?2001400ex said:
Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?pawz said:
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off. -
2001400ex said:
Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?pawz said:
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off.pawz said:
To dignify the charade? No thank you.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
And fuck off. -
So you're saying you're a strawman ass fucker that needs a punch in the face?2001400ex said:
So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.SFGbob said:
Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?2001400ex said:
Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?pawz said:
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off. -
Hillary has Hondo working overtim today.
-
Come meet me at the 7/11 in liberty lake and say that to my face.SFGbob said:
So you're saying you're a strawman ass fucker that needs a punch in the face?2001400ex said:
So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.SFGbob said:
Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?2001400ex said:
Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?pawz said:
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off.
Nice white flag otherwise. -
Melt down2001400ex said:
Come meet me at the 7/11 in liberty lake and say that to my face.SFGbob said:
So you're saying you're a strawman ass fucker that needs a punch in the face?2001400ex said:
So you are saying people with intimate knowledge of what happened are not relevant. But people who were not directly involved are relevant. I knew you were a partisan shill Bob. But that's just straight Idiocracy there.SFGbob said:
Why is that required for an impeachment hearing? Why won't Schiff let the whistle blower and Hunter Biden testify?2001400ex said:
Call me when that's required for an impeachment hearing. Why won't Trump's top aids testify?pawz said:
Wake me when hearsay qualifies for any evidentiary standard.2001400ex said:
Everyone who testified backed up what the whistleblower said.Sledog said:
Really? where's the whistleblower? That's the accuser. None of the people testifying had any incriminating evidence. None. No one had evidence allowed under federal rules of evidence the Senate would use making all of it useless in the Senate trial.2001400ex said:
The accusers did testify. Did your news source not tell you what they said?Sledog said:
Because they don't have to and congressional subpoenas don't mean shit in this instance.2001400ex said:All of that being said. Why is Trump fighting to keep his top aids from testifying?
Why won't the accusers testify? Much better question. Trump doesn't have to prove his innocence no matter what Nancy tells dumb shits like you.
Everything was done to rig the process and yet they have a big fat nothingburger.
Reminds of you.
Is that the name of your greasy spoon? Nothing burger. Fitting for you.
Are you that dumb? Now let the Trump aids testify.
And fuck off.
Nice white flag otherwise. -
