Why won't they testify?
Comments
-
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too. -
Dark thread -
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right -
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One of two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right -
You mean like the Kurd outrage?2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One is two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right
-
Did I spread shit on that story saying the hammer is going to drop any day now and that politicians were criminals based on that story?PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like the Kurd outrage?2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One is two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right -
You'll be surprised. More so than paying 79k for a truck.2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One of two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right -
Your ignorance is showing even more with this comment. It's almost like you are an ex mall cop that doesn't have a basic understanding of taxes.Sledog said:
You'll be surprised. More so than paying 79k for a truck.2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One of two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right -
Hondo in full meltdown
-
Yes exactly. Bigly.RaceBannon said:Hondo in full meltdown
