Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Josh Conerly, 2022 5* OL, Seattle (Rainier Beach), WA (Offered)

11617182022

Comments

  • dannarc
    dannarc Member Posts: 2,698
    edited April 2022
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,220 Standard Supporter
    I LIVED IN THE PEARL!!!

    🤣

    Please don’t stop, @haie

    I’m close to finishing over here…
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    thechatch said:

    I LIVED IN THE PEARL!!!

    🤣

    Please don’t stop, @haie

    I’m close to finishing over here…

    You know he’s lying.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    ntxduck said:

    thechatch said:

    I’ve never seen someone with @haie ‘s level of message board needle dick syndrome. I mean the shit this guy brags about is fucking pathetic.

    It’s great that he admitted he lived in battle ground, WA about a year ago on here…got shit on mercilessly for being a poor who could only afford a house in the exurbs…and now uses it as an insult to make fun of others thinking people would forget
    None of this is coherent bud. I've never lived in Battleground nor any other Clark county city since graduating from UW.

    Lived in Pearl and near Rose Garden in Portland before having kids and then moved out of all of that bullshit.

    @46XiJCAB who still can't figure out how to upload a jpg is a poor just like the rest of you.

    Have fun until Phil sells the couch. Congrats.
    So you live on the outskirts of BG in Lewis County. You’ve never lived in the Pearl. Clock slave.
    You got me 🖐️🖐️
    You leave too many breadcrumbs dumbass.
  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    haie said:

    haie said:

    Tequilla said:

    thechatch said:

    haie said:

    thechatch said:

    haie said:

    trublue said:

    There was a Live link on DJ’s site for Connerly’s announcement at 6:00 p.m.

    He chose Eugene over Los Angeles . . . No mention of Seattle.

    Sounds like he doesn't wanna try and cut it in a real city. Reminds me of some loser quooks on this site.
    I’ll have you know that I sell vacuum cleaners in downtown Seattle.

    REAL CITY.

    🤣
    We both know that what you do is maybe 1 or 2 steps above that, which is the joke.

    I build e commerce systems, so suck my dick, inferior duck.

    You guys get your day in the Sun and it's all about Warshington, per usual. Pathetic.
    Yes!

    This is almost word for word what I hoped and expected you’d reply with.

    You never disappoint, little guy. Never.
    So Haie gets shit on working at Amazon … sounds about right
    If you read my shit and think I work for them you might be a fucking idiot.
    Amazon works for Haie.
    I wonder what greenblood does for a living. Hmm.
    Pumps gas, like every other Duck.
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,184 Standard Supporter
    I was just listening to Wilner on Friday saying that Cal and Stanford might not even be around (as P5 programs) in 10 years because they have no desire to participate in the NIL stuff.
  • RatherBeBrewing
    RatherBeBrewing Member Posts: 1,557

    I was just listening to Wilner on Friday saying that Cal and Stanford might not even be around (as P5 programs) in 10 years because they have no desire to participate in the NIL stuff.
    Cal I can believe. Unless those businesses or donors are willing to give matching money to the Pubic Hair Fund, the TranxWomynLatinx Society, and sponsor a publishing run of a book of verse poetry by first generation indigenous Bolivian immigrants then I don’t see them making NIL a priority. Even so, Cal only pays Wilcox $250k of that $4.75 mil - the rest is privately funded.

    I call bullshit on Stanford. There’s enough money and desire from some people to keep them competing at a high level. Their coaching positions are endowed. When the pandemic made it so they couldn’t practice in their county they just rented facilities a few hours away. Could have even gone to Nevada, I don’t remember details but the point is they care. They have little in the way of fans, but it’s a quality over quantity situation.
  • RatherBeBrewing
    RatherBeBrewing Member Posts: 1,557
    haie said:

    trublue said:

    Uhhh, no. A bad year at Cal and he’s probably fired. He could have gotten a new guaranteed contract at Oregon and would have been tough to fire without disaster because he’s an alum.
    Wilcox is not getting fired. He just signed a six year extension at an average of $4.75 mil per with retention bonuses, not including incentives. Got a 20% increase in the assistant salary pool.

    Cal was stoked to keep him. I’m in the minority of Oregon fans who wanted him hired.
    Why did you want him hired? Just curious.
    I think Wilcox is an excellent coach who would be able to succeed at Oregon. The dream job = not stepping stone wasn’t a significant factor, him being an alumnus was more of a bonus.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m equally satisfied with Lanning who is more exciting and has a high recruiting ceiling. Wilcox is a more proven commodity with HC experience, and before people say 7-5 is the commodity - don’t forget how many times he’s out coached the superior talent Cristobal or Petersen has. Give him Oregon’s roster and I think he could have a 9 win floor and a CFP loss ceiling. He wouldn’t recruit like is expected nowadays, but contrary to what some think I believe in wins over star ratings.

    Nate Costa was just interviewed by Clownzano last week, and when asked who the best coach in the conference is he had no hesitation on Wilcox. It’s a very unexciting prospect, hence the fan rebellion, but it’s not a rare opinion.
    Wilcox is the PAC 12 master of barely losing to, or beating, teams above his weight class. But he kind of sucks otherwise, so dunno what that makes him at SC or Oregon.

    There would be a minority that would be stoked at both UW and Oregon.

    My impression of him in person last year was that he mostly sucks.
    I’m not his staunchest defender so I won’t give too much effort explaining it, but here’s the basics:

    * Opinion, not fact: Pre-pandemic when they stopped his ability to practice or even have access to players Wilcox had Cal poised for a breakthrough.

    * Fact: Post Pappy Waldorf there had been two coaches with “success” at Cal, Bruce Snyder and Tedford. Wilcox’s floor is already higher than Snyder’s was. Tedford is obviously a great coach but he also cut corners to where Cal was fucked academically. He used more special exemption admits than anyone else, not even close. Even WITH Tedford’s record here is a list of post WWII Pac schools with a worse record than Cal: Cuog, Beav.

    * The last three Oregon-Cal games he out coached Cristobal’s staff. Before anyone starts with ‘but it’s Cristobal’:
    A. Remember those meaty steroid tits own a couch in Coral Gables so you can stop shitting on him and admit he had a decent enough system.
    B. Keep in mind the talent disparity. As Costa said there is no way Oregon should come close to losing.
    C. His team absolutely was better prepared, play called, and coached for the most part. If it wasn’t for Kayvon Thibodeaux in 2019 and his second half return from suspension in 2021 then Cal is 3-0 in those.
    D. He did the same to Petermanson in 18 and 19. He’s done the same to Shaw.

    Anyway, Wilcox is a good coach for Cal and at either Washington or Oregon he’s a great coach. I was a little scared that Washington would hire him, to be honest. There is a solid history of hiring a P-5 coach who is overachieving at a historically mediocre P-5 program. Saban to LSU, Tubs to Auburn, Mack Brown to Texas, Spurrier to Florida, Franklin to Pedo, Les Miles to LSU, even Dennis Erickson and Mike Leach - those are just some that came to mind.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    haie said:

    haie said:

    Tequilla said:

    thechatch said:

    haie said:

    thechatch said:

    haie said:

    trublue said:

    There was a Live link on DJ’s site for Connerly’s announcement at 6:00 p.m.

    He chose Eugene over Los Angeles . . . No mention of Seattle.

    Sounds like he doesn't wanna try and cut it in a real city. Reminds me of some loser quooks on this site.
    I’ll have you know that I sell vacuum cleaners in downtown Seattle.

    REAL CITY.

    🤣
    We both know that what you do is maybe 1 or 2 steps above that, which is the joke.

    I build e commerce systems, so suck my dick, inferior duck.

    You guys get your day in the Sun and it's all about Warshington, per usual. Pathetic.
    Yes!

    This is almost word for word what I hoped and expected you’d reply with.

    You never disappoint, little guy. Never.
    So Haie gets shit on working at Amazon … sounds about right
    If you read my shit and think I work for them you might be a fucking idiot.
    Amazon works for Haie.
    I wonder what greenblood does for a living. Hmm.
    I married into money. Winning
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    Rather Be Brewing: Thanks for the response re: Wilcox.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,696 Founders Club
    Only 5 ⭐ OL can make a catch like that.
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,256 Founders Club
    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,269 Standard Supporter

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,256 Founders Club
    dtd said:

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
    I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    edited November 2022

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.

    The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit.
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,269 Standard Supporter

    dtd said:

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
    I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.
    We talkin bout practice!
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,256 Founders Club

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.

    The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit.
    You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being used
  • theLSkid
    theLSkid Member Posts: 344

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.

    The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit.
    You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being used
    If I’m UO after watching the UW defense this year, I’m throwing in every wrinkle and little trick play against Colorado to make the UW coaches work them throughout the week. They obviously struggle at game planning.
    So when we put a DB over an OT because ‘we saw the play’ and they run the ball in our face on the goal line.. we will see how bad the defensive structure really is.


  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.

    The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit.
    You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being used
    Stanford on the road at peak USC as 30+ point underdogs disagree. Oregon used some trickery and got out in front big, then they took their foot off
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,804 Founders Club

    so just get the 4 in state guys and call it a day for huff in 2022

    Did Huff win yet?
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,256 Founders Club
    They can put Franklin on Perryman all day and win this week
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098

    dtd said:

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
    I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.
    They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forward
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,269 Standard Supporter
    Tequilla said:

    dtd said:

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
    I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.
    They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forward
    JFC, dog forbid a team have fun playing sportsball.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,036

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.

    The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit.
    You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being used
    I think those plays were to give Washington more shit for which they have to prepare. Oregon was never not in control of that game.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,036
    edited November 2022
    Tequilla said:

    dtd said:

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
    I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.
    They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forward
    It's hate week, so this sub-thread on Oregon's gimmicky plays is understandable. I can remember when doogman and to an extent this board was full of that line of thinking during Chip's run. Now Chip is worshipped as a coaching God around here because he's not there anymore.

    And, on the second part about using it for recruits ... and? If recruits see your program as perhaps an exciting place to play, isn't that a good thing? Or is it not prestigious enough.
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,084 Founders Club

    Tequilla said:

    dtd said:

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
    I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.
    They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forward
    It's hate week, so this sub-thread on Oregon's gimmicky plays is understandable. I can remember when doogman and to an extent this board was full of that line of thinking during Chip's run. Now Chip is worshipped as a coaching God around here because he's not there anymore.

    And, on the second part about using it for recruits ... and? If recruits see your program as perhaps an exciting place to play, isn't that a good thing? Or is it not prestigious enough.
    They did it because they knew they could beat Colorado by 30 while barely trying so they could take risks. They did it to try and get some attention in a week where there wasn't anything they could prove and to excite the virgins on Twitter that get excited about the shit they do like that and probably a little bit for recruiting so mission accomplished. Hopefully Sewell feels good about a 1-yard TD run making up for his dogshit season.

    A lot of the shit they did with Chip bothered me but never in a way like this it was more stuff that I felt was ultimately meaningless like going for two after the first TD each time and the way the college football media (the aformementioned virgins) reacted to it. With Chip he also did that shit against everyone too where I feel like this was picking on a hapless bunch who you stole their best player.

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098

    Tequilla said:

    dtd said:

    Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team

    You don't really believe that, do you?
    I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.
    They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forward
    It's hate week, so this sub-thread on Oregon's gimmicky plays is understandable. I can remember when doogman and to an extent this board was full of that line of thinking during Chip's run. Now Chip is worshipped as a coaching God around here because he's not there anymore.

    And, on the second part about using it for recruits ... and? If recruits see your program as perhaps an exciting place to play, isn't that a good thing? Or is it not prestigious enough.
    Whatever Oregon does has been working for them going on for 30 years …

    I’m not bashing it