Josh Conerly, 2022 5* OL, Seattle (Rainier Beach), WA (Offered)
Comments
-
-
-
You leave too many breadcrumbs dumbass.haie said:
You got me 🖐️🖐️46XiJCAB said:
So you live on the outskirts of BG in Lewis County. You’ve never lived in the Pearl. Clock slave.haie said:
None of this is coherent bud. I've never lived in Battleground nor any other Clark county city since graduating from UW.ntxduck said:
It’s great that he admitted he lived in battle ground, WA about a year ago on here…got shit on mercilessly for being a poor who could only afford a house in the exurbs…and now uses it as an insult to make fun of others thinking people would forgetthechatch said:I’ve never seen someone with @haie ‘s level of message board needle dick syndrome. I mean the shit this guy brags about is fucking pathetic.
Lived in Pearl and near Rose Garden in Portland before having kids and then moved out of all of that bullshit.
@46XiJCAB who still can't figure out how to upload a jpg is a poor just like the rest of you.
Have fun until Phil sells the couch. Congrats. -
I think Hardcore Husky needs a new Godwin's Law. Instead of Hitler, this new version should read, "At Hardcore Husky, any thread of significant length will eventually develop fullblown AIDS."
-
Pumps gas, like every other Duck.haie said:
I wonder what greenblood does for a living. Hmm.greenblood said:
Amazon works for Haie.haie said:
If you read my shit and think I work for them you might be a fucking idiot.Tequilla said:
So Haie gets shit on working at Amazon … sounds about rightthechatch said:
Yes!haie said:
We both know that what you do is maybe 1 or 2 steps above that, which is the joke.thechatch said:
I’ll have you know that I sell vacuum cleaners in downtown Seattle.haie said:
Sounds like he doesn't wanna try and cut it in a real city. Reminds me of some loser quooks on this site.trublue said:There was a Live link on DJ’s site for Connerly’s announcement at 6:00 p.m.
He chose Eugene over Los Angeles . . . No mention of Seattle.
REAL CITY.
🤣
I build e commerce systems, so suck my dick, inferior duck.
You guys get your day in the Sun and it's all about Warshington, per usual. Pathetic.
This is almost word for word what I hoped and expected you’d reply with.
You never disappoint, little guy. Never. -
I was just listening to Wilner on Friday saying that Cal and Stanford might not even be around (as P5 programs) in 10 years because they have no desire to participate in the NIL stuff.bananasnblondes said: -
Cal I can believe. Unless those businesses or donors are willing to give matching money to the Pubic Hair Fund, the TranxWomynLatinx Society, and sponsor a publishing run of a book of verse poetry by first generation indigenous Bolivian immigrants then I don’t see them making NIL a priority. Even so, Cal only pays Wilcox $250k of that $4.75 mil - the rest is privately funded.BleachedAnusDawg said:
I was just listening to Wilner on Friday saying that Cal and Stanford might not even be around (as P5 programs) in 10 years because they have no desire to participate in the NIL stuff.bananasnblondes said:
I call bullshit on Stanford. There’s enough money and desire from some people to keep them competing at a high level. Their coaching positions are endowed. When the pandemic made it so they couldn’t practice in their county they just rented facilities a few hours away. Could have even gone to Nevada, I don’t remember details but the point is they care. They have little in the way of fans, but it’s a quality over quantity situation. -
I’m not his staunchest defender so I won’t give too much effort explaining it, but here’s the basics:haie said:
Wilcox is the PAC 12 master of barely losing to, or beating, teams above his weight class. But he kind of sucks otherwise, so dunno what that makes him at SC or Oregon.RatherBeBrewing said:
I think Wilcox is an excellent coach who would be able to succeed at Oregon. The dream job = not stepping stone wasn’t a significant factor, him being an alumnus was more of a bonus.trublue said:
Why did you want him hired? Just curious.RatherBeBrewing said:
Wilcox is not getting fired. He just signed a six year extension at an average of $4.75 mil per with retention bonuses, not including incentives. Got a 20% increase in the assistant salary pool.RoadDawg55 said:
Uhhh, no. A bad year at Cal and he’s probably fired. He could have gotten a new guaranteed contract at Oregon and would have been tough to fire without disaster because he’s an alum.bananasnblondes said:
Cal was stoked to keep him. I’m in the minority of Oregon fans who wanted him hired.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m equally satisfied with Lanning who is more exciting and has a high recruiting ceiling. Wilcox is a more proven commodity with HC experience, and before people say 7-5 is the commodity - don’t forget how many times he’s out coached the superior talent Cristobal or Petersen has. Give him Oregon’s roster and I think he could have a 9 win floor and a CFP loss ceiling. He wouldn’t recruit like is expected nowadays, but contrary to what some think I believe in wins over star ratings.
Nate Costa was just interviewed by Clownzano last week, and when asked who the best coach in the conference is he had no hesitation on Wilcox. It’s a very unexciting prospect, hence the fan rebellion, but it’s not a rare opinion.
There would be a minority that would be stoked at both UW and Oregon.
My impression of him in person last year was that he mostly sucks.
* Opinion, not fact: Pre-pandemic when they stopped his ability to practice or even have access to players Wilcox had Cal poised for a breakthrough.
* Fact: Post Pappy Waldorf there had been two coaches with “success” at Cal, Bruce Snyder and Tedford. Wilcox’s floor is already higher than Snyder’s was. Tedford is obviously a great coach but he also cut corners to where Cal was fucked academically. He used more special exemption admits than anyone else, not even close. Even WITH Tedford’s record here is a list of post WWII Pac schools with a worse record than Cal: Cuog, Beav.
* The last three Oregon-Cal games he out coached Cristobal’s staff. Before anyone starts with ‘but it’s Cristobal’:
A. Remember those meaty steroid tits own a couch in Coral Gables so you can stop shitting on him and admit he had a decent enough system.
B. Keep in mind the talent disparity. As Costa said there is no way Oregon should come close to losing.
C. His team absolutely was better prepared, play called, and coached for the most part. If it wasn’t for Kayvon Thibodeaux in 2019 and his second half return from suspension in 2021 then Cal is 3-0 in those.
D. He did the same to Petermanson in 18 and 19. He’s done the same to Shaw.
Anyway, Wilcox is a good coach for Cal and at either Washington or Oregon he’s a great coach. I was a little scared that Washington would hire him, to be honest. There is a solid history of hiring a P-5 coach who is overachieving at a historically mediocre P-5 program. Saban to LSU, Tubs to Auburn, Mack Brown to Texas, Spurrier to Florida, Franklin to Pedo, Les Miles to LSU, even Dennis Erickson and Mike Leach - those are just some that came to mind. -
I married into money. Winninghaie said:
I wonder what greenblood does for a living. Hmm.greenblood said:
Amazon works for Haie.haie said:
If you read my shit and think I work for them you might be a fucking idiot.Tequilla said:
So Haie gets shit on working at Amazon … sounds about rightthechatch said:
Yes!haie said:
We both know that what you do is maybe 1 or 2 steps above that, which is the joke.thechatch said:
I’ll have you know that I sell vacuum cleaners in downtown Seattle.haie said:
Sounds like he doesn't wanna try and cut it in a real city. Reminds me of some loser quooks on this site.trublue said:There was a Live link on DJ’s site for Connerly’s announcement at 6:00 p.m.
He chose Eugene over Los Angeles . . . No mention of Seattle.
REAL CITY.
🤣
I build e commerce systems, so suck my dick, inferior duck.
You guys get your day in the Sun and it's all about Warshington, per usual. Pathetic.
This is almost word for word what I hoped and expected you’d reply with.
You never disappoint, little guy. Never. -
Rather Be Brewing: Thanks for the response re: Wilcox.
-
Only 5 ⭐ OL can make a catch like that.
-
Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
-
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
-
I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.dtd said:
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
-
Part of his NIL t and c'sMotrboatnsob said: -
Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit. -
We talkin bout practice!JoeEDangerously said:
I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.dtd said:
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
-
You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being usedgreenblood said:
Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit. -
If I’m UO after watching the UW defense this year, I’m throwing in every wrinkle and little trick play against Colorado to make the UW coaches work them throughout the week. They obviously struggle at game planning.JoeEDangerously said:
You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being usedgreenblood said:
Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit.
So when we put a DB over an OT because ‘we saw the play’ and they run the ball in our face on the goal line.. we will see how bad the defensive structure really is.
-
Stanford on the road at peak USC as 30+ point underdogs disagree. Oregon used some trickery and got out in front big, then they took their foot offJoeEDangerously said:
You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being usedgreenblood said:
Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit. -
Neighbor2972 said:
Did Huff win yet?FKA_Mousecop said:so just get the 4 in state guys and call it a day for huff in 2022
-
They can put Franklin on Perryman all day and win this week
-
They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forwardJoeEDangerously said:
I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.dtd said:
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
-
JFC, dog forbid a team have fun playing sportsball.Tequilla said:
They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forwardJoeEDangerously said:
I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.dtd said:
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
-
I think those plays were to give Washington more shit for which they have to prepare. Oregon was never not in control of that game.JoeEDangerously said:
You were going to beat Colorado by 39 regardless of the play being usedgreenblood said:
Please explain how scoring on that play with the score 0-0 is running it up? We did this shit under Chip as well. Nothing wrong with throwing in a couple winkles that future opponents have to prepare for.JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
The is actually a very good difference from Cristobal. However, our defense still looks like shit. -
It's hate week, so this sub-thread on Oregon's gimmicky plays is understandable. I can remember when doogman and to an extent this board was full of that line of thinking during Chip's run. Now Chip is worshipped as a coaching God around here because he's not there anymore.Tequilla said:
They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forwardJoeEDangerously said:
I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.dtd said:
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
And, on the second part about using it for recruits ... and? If recruits see your program as perhaps an exciting place to play, isn't that a good thing? Or is it not prestigious enough. -
They did it because they knew they could beat Colorado by 30 while barely trying so they could take risks. They did it to try and get some attention in a week where there wasn't anything they could prove and to excite the virgins on Twitter that get excited about the shit they do like that and probably a little bit for recruiting so mission accomplished. Hopefully Sewell feels good about a 1-yard TD run making up for his dogshit season.creepycoug said:
It's hate week, so this sub-thread on Oregon's gimmicky plays is understandable. I can remember when doogman and to an extent this board was full of that line of thinking during Chip's run. Now Chip is worshipped as a coaching God around here because he's not there anymore.Tequilla said:
They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forwardJoeEDangerously said:
I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.dtd said:
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
And, on the second part about using it for recruits ... and? If recruits see your program as perhaps an exciting place to play, isn't that a good thing? Or is it not prestigious enough.
A lot of the shit they did with Chip bothered me but never in a way like this it was more stuff that I felt was ultimately meaningless like going for two after the first TD each time and the way the college football media (the aformementioned virgins) reacted to it. With Chip he also did that shit against everyone too where I feel like this was picking on a hapless bunch who you stole their best player.
-
Whatever Oregon does has been working for them going on for 30 years …creepycoug said:
It's hate week, so this sub-thread on Oregon's gimmicky plays is understandable. I can remember when doogman and to an extent this board was full of that line of thinking during Chip's run. Now Chip is worshipped as a coaching God around here because he's not there anymore.Tequilla said:
They do that shit because they can circle jerk themselves after the game and then use shit like that in recruiting going forwardJoeEDangerously said:
I believe they’re better than Colorado and the gimmicky shit was unnecessary.dtd said:
You don't really believe that, do you?JoeEDangerously said:Funny they can’t just line up and beat Colorado. They have to pull out a bunch of gimmick plays to run up the score on an inferior team
And, on the second part about using it for recruits ... and? If recruits see your program as perhaps an exciting place to play, isn't that a good thing? Or is it not prestigious enough.
I’m not bashing it