Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kangaroo Court

245

Comments

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,465 Standard Supporter

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    BearsWiin said:

    USMChawk said:

    Sledog said:
    2001400ex said:
    From your link:

    Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.

    The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.

    That sounds unfair. To an imbecile.
    It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trial
    Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.
    Post the Nixon and Clinton rules bitch boy.
    Well Clinton was impeached without the house investigating him and during a lame duck Congress. Do you think they should go that route?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,465 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    BearsWiin said:

    USMChawk said:

    Sledog said:
    2001400ex said:
    From your link:

    Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.

    The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.

    That sounds unfair. To an imbecile.
    It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trial
    Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.
    Post the Nixon and Clinton rules bitch boy.
    Well Clinton was impeached without the house investigating him and during a lame duck Congress. Do you think they should go that route?
    Clinton committed perjury. It was plain and simple. Any of us would have been put in jail. Felony most places. He was also disbarred IIRC for it.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    BearsWiin said:

    USMChawk said:

    Sledog said:
    2001400ex said:
    From your link:

    Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.

    The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.

    That sounds unfair. To an imbecile.
    It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trial
    Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.
    Post the Nixon and Clinton rules bitch boy.
    Well Clinton was impeached without the house investigating him and during a lame duck Congress. Do you think they should go that route?
    Clinton committed perjury. It was plain and simple. Any of us would have been put in jail. Felony most places. He was also disbarred IIRC for it.
    Wait until Trump gets under oath.
  • ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    Sledog said:

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
    The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.
  • ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,078

    It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.

    LOL right...
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.

    You've just basically ensured you'll be getting Trump for another 4 years. Don't let that distract you from taking a victory lap though.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    It's not one party impeaching another. It's the House impeaching the president. You will not get anywhere until you accept this.

    You've just basically ensured you'll be getting Trump for another 4 years. Don't let that distract you from taking a victory lap though.
    You could be sorely disappointed. Can't wait for your meltdown.
  • ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    No rational Trumptard arguments here

    Also the kangaroo court metaphor fails... That is the Senate's job
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter
    It is interesting watching the rats on here defend the indefensible. It just reveals what life would be like under their socialist control. Kangaroo courts, unequal justice, and the right to equal representation taken away.

    The idiots on here think this plays well around the country. It doesn't. The majority out there aren't stupid like these rats and it is going to bite them in the ass.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,465 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2019

    Sledog said:

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
    The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.
    The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?

    We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.

    By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
    The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.
    The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?

    We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.

    By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
    That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,268 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
    The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.
    The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?

    We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.

    By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
    That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.
    Fuck off.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
    The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.
    The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?

    We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.

    By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
    That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.
    Fuck off.
    You sound bitter that your guy probably committed an impeachable offense. The sooner you realize this, the lower your stress will be.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    2001400ex said:

    BearsWiin said:

    USMChawk said:

    Sledog said:
    2001400ex said:
    From your link:

    Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.

    The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.

    That sounds unfair. To an imbecile.
    It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trial
    Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.
    Hondo still repeating this lie.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,703 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
    The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.
    The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?

    We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.

    By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
    That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.
    Fuck off.
    You sound bitter that your guy probably committed an impeachable offense. The sooner you realize this, the lower your stress will be.
    Trump isn't in jail. Hasn't been convicted. Been investigated for years

    By your own measure Trump is innocent
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,465 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

    Trumptards don't realize that the House can run impeachment any way they see fit. There is no check or restrictions... For any reason. The power is a sole power.
    Except only one party is allowed to participate and its not an impeachment. It's never been done this way before. It's already a farce but now it a soviet style farce. Americans aren't this dumb.
    The House has the sole power of impeachment and there is no mention of parties in the Constitution. Like cirrhosis say you don't understand the actual rules.
    The lack of rules does not mean any ruleis just. So they can bar people of color from participating? Or bar a sex?

    We still have judicial standards and this doesn't meet them. If you're ok with this it just process you really are a communist piece of shit.

    By the way, where is the whistleblower? Shouldn't the person supposedly starting all this testify? This another new judicial standard from the commie party?
    That's what the Senate is for. Read the Constitution. Your meltdown is spectacular however.
    Thisis a judicial process fora supposed crime. The accused has rights. HTH

    Fucking shitbag commies.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    Leftists here are essentially saying that they know the current process is unfair but they don't care. The Rats in the House could makes this a transparent and open and balanced process but they don't have to and they're fine with that. A process that allows the Rats to veto the witnesses the Republicans can call and to sign off on the questions that can be asked is perfectly okay with them.

    If you had any doubts, and I didn't, the Rats don't give a fuck about the truth or the facts. Trump was going to be impeached as soon as they took back the House and the facts never mattered.
Sign In or Register to comment.