Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Kangaroo Court
Sledog
Member Posts: 38,638 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
But how are the democrats not fascists?
-
You should read articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution. Your ignorance is breathtaking.
-
Tulsi voted for this. I'm hearing she is a moderate.
-
Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html -
Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys. -
USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
You sound like a fascist.CirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
If it requires the left's approval it's bullshit. It's all one sided bullshit and trump Ann's everyoneelse needs to refuse to participate.USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
If you get arrested I'm sure you'll want these same rules. -
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile. -
Or that their heroes wrote the rules. Or that their news source is bullshit.BearsWiin said:
It's almost like they don't realize that this isn't a trialCirrhosisDawg said:USMChawk said:Sledog said:
From your link:2001400ex said:Weird the actual document doesn't say that.
https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-release-impeachment-resolution-that-calls-for-open-hearings-210206532.html
Republicans will have the opportunity to request witnesses of their own, although they will have to provide “detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation.” Democrats on the committee will have the power to approve or block witnesses requested by Republicans.
The president’s attorneys will also have the chance to participate in the impeachment proceedings, though only in the House Judiciary Committee, not in the House Intelligence Committee. As on Intelligence, Democrats on Judiciary will have to approve witnesses requested by Trump’s attorneys.
That sounds unfair. To an imbecile.
