We are fucked no matter what EASON does
Comments
-
Always obligatory.RaceBannon said:Seeing a lot of excuses for poor line play and if you take out all the other teams good plays we were right there posts.
Not a great O line at all. Barely good if I want to be generous.
Winners win and grind the opposition to the dust. Losers have great reasons why we didn't
Lather rinse repeat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQY6IYVAfw8 -
JFC.RoadDawg55 said:You guys are having selective memories. This OL is probably better than 2000.
Ward was a better guard than anyone we have. Other than that, we are better at every other spot.
Adams > Silvers
Kirkland > Fraze & and Dom Daste
Harris > Benn
Hilbers > Wes Call
The 2000 team ran the ball more and also had a running QB while this team has a pocket passer.
2000 team is much better because they won a Rose Bowl and popped off. However, they were a team that did more with less. They were tough and clutch when it counted and Pete’s teams have been the opposite of that.
-
All of my J-responsive posts are meant to be argumentative.RaceBannon said:
And another take away anything good the opponent did and we were great postcreepycoug said:
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.PurpleJ said:Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug
))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
Take away 65 points in 2001 and UW takes that game to over time -
The nfl doesn't care whether an OL was on a winner or a loser team in college.RaceBannon said:Seeing a lot of excuses for poor line play and if you take out all the other teams good plays we were right there posts.
Not a great O line at all. Barely good if I want to be generous.
Winners win and grind the opposition to the dust. Losers have great reasons why we didn't
Lather rinse repeat -
The thing is. Browning would actually wait until the very last second and get drilled if that is what it took to throw the receiver open.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
It didn’t always work of course, but He did it a lot.
I didn’t see Eason do that against Stanford or Oregon. Once.
-
People forget that Tui passed for 300 and ran for 200 in the same game.Baseman said:
With Tui running the option.DerekJohnson said:
By November 2000 I remember we were averaging something like 275 yards rushing a game. (during that stretch of time)PurpleJ said:Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug
))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly. -
Browning invented and perfected the 25 yard retreat and self-sack. Next.salemcoog said:
The thing is. Browning would actually wait until the very last second and get drilled if that is what it took to throw the receiver open.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
It didn’t always work of course, but He did it a lot.
I didn’t see Eason do that against Stanford or Oregon. Once.
-
You mean like the time I mentioned the linebackers in the OP?TurdBomber said:What's the point of a thread like this when it's obvious UW has lost 3 winnable games because the D can't stop the run when the game is on the line?
-
I will say that Miami definition of OKG > Pete OKGcreepycoug said:
Ok, but you can't take sacks out. It's part of the O line's performance.dnc said:
OTOH, they scored four TDs on the ground.creepycoug said:
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.PurpleJ said:Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug
))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
And after you take sacks out it was 3.8 yards per carry. Which isn't great but they ran the ball well enough to rack up 42 rushing attempts. They were moving the chains on the ground.
UW held the ball for 37.28 compared to just 22:32 for da U.
I'd say the purple OL handled their bidness that day.
The 2000 team had a good O line. I don't dispute that. I thought at the time that there would be more NFL careers coming out of that group than did, which I've never understood.
Back to the game, the most effective rusher other than Alexis' two runs was Tui, and I'm not sure how much credit goes to the O line. Tui had a great feel for the option that's hard to teach, and at that he was at 3.0 yards per carry.
Both teams had 3 turnovers, which factored into the game as much as anything.
The runner of the day was Clinton Portis, who averaged over 15 yds. per carry on 6 carries. Curiously, "Game Day" Butch didn't play him until well into the second half. He was the best player on the field for either team.
I miss MIAMI dammit. And WARSHINGTON.
-
I will HANDLE u like my DAWGS bitch.creepycoug said:
All of my J-responsive posts are meant to be argumentative.RaceBannon said:
And another take away anything good the opponent did and we were great postcreepycoug said:
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.PurpleJ said:Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug
))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
Take away 65 points in 2001 and UW takes that game to over time -
Threads meander over days. I'd missed or forgotten your OP, prolly because it lacked Nazi references. My bad.PurpleJ said:
You mean like the time I mentioned the linebackers in the OP?TurdBomber said:What's the point of a thread like this when it's obvious UW has lost 3 winnable games because the D can't stop the run when the game is on the line?
-
Get it right J.PurpleJ said:
I will HANDLE u like mycreepycoug said:
All of my J-responsive posts are meant to be argumentative.RaceBannon said:
And another take away anything good the opponent did and we were great postcreepycoug said:
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.PurpleJ said:Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug
))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
Take away 65 points in 2001 and UW takes that game to over timeDAWGSDWAGS bitch. -
That's great because I don't care about the NFLchuck said:
The nfl doesn't care whether an OL was on a winner or a loser team in college.RaceBannon said:Seeing a lot of excuses for poor line play and if you take out all the other teams good plays we were right there posts.
Not a great O line at all. Barely good if I want to be generous.
Winners win and grind the opposition to the dust. Losers have great reasons why we didn't
Lather rinse repeat -
#metooRaceBannon said:
That's great because I don't care about the NFLchuck said:
The nfl doesn't care whether an OL was on a winner or a loser team in college.RaceBannon said:Seeing a lot of excuses for poor line play and if you take out all the other teams good plays we were right there posts.
Not a great O line at all. Barely good if I want to be generous.
Winners win and grind the opposition to the dust. Losers have great reasons why we didn't
Lather rinse repeat -
I like Eason, but the big dick stuff is stupid. He’s soft. Even tho he’s not fast he should be a load to take down because he’s huge. He goes down pretty easy and the slide vs Cal was unbelievably soft. Browning ain’t sliding when he can get a first. He would have been absolutely blasted for that play.salemcoog said:
The thing is. Browning would actually wait until the very last second and get drilled if that is what it took to throw the receiver open.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
It didn’t always work of course, but He did it a lot.
I didn’t see Eason do that against Stanford or Oregon. Once.
-
I dont even know if what I said was a part of your excuses post so my reply seems a little weird now. My only point was that UW has some good linemen that are more talented than the results they're getting. This will bear out in the draft.RaceBannon said:
That's great because I don't care about the NFLchuck said:
The nfl doesn't care whether an OL was on a winner or a loser team in college.RaceBannon said:Seeing a lot of excuses for poor line play and if you take out all the other teams good plays we were right there posts.
Not a great O line at all. Barely good if I want to be generous.
Winners win and grind the opposition to the dust. Losers have great reasons why we didn't
Lather rinse repeat -
Please don't fluff Browning on these boreds. Please. This year has been tough enough already. Don't make it worse.RoadDawg55 said:
I like Eason, but the big dick stuff is stupid. He’s soft. Even tho he’s not fast he should be a load to take down because he’s huge. He goes down pretty easy and the slide vs Cal was unbelievably soft. Browning ain’t sliding when he can get a first. He would have been absolutely blasted for that play.salemcoog said:
The thing is. Browning would actually wait until the very last second and get drilled if that is what it took to throw the receiver open.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
It didn’t always work of course, but He did it a lot.
I didn’t see Eason do that against Stanford or Oregon. Once. -
Jake Browning was the winningest QB at UW. Great, heady player. He broke a lot of records too.TurdBomber said:
Please don't fluff Browning on these boreds. Please. This year has been tough enough already. Don't make it worse.RoadDawg55 said:
I like Eason, but the big dick stuff is stupid. He’s soft. Even tho he’s not fast he should be a load to take down because he’s huge. He goes down pretty easy and the slide vs Cal was unbelievably soft. Browning ain’t sliding when he can get a first. He would have been absolutely blasted for that play.salemcoog said:
The thing is. Browning would actually wait until the very last second and get drilled if that is what it took to throw the receiver open.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
It didn’t always work of course, but He did it a lot.
I didn’t see Eason do that against Stanford or Oregon. Once. -
Roady STOP!RoadDawg55 said:
Jake Browning was the winningest QB at UW. Great, heady player. He broke a lot of records too.TurdBomber said:
Please don't fluff Browning on these boreds. Please. This year has been tough enough already. Don't make it worse.RoadDawg55 said:
I like Eason, but the big dick stuff is stupid. He’s soft. Even tho he’s not fast he should be a load to take down because he’s huge. He goes down pretty easy and the slide vs Cal was unbelievably soft. Browning ain’t sliding when he can get a first. He would have been absolutely blasted for that play.salemcoog said:
The thing is. Browning would actually wait until the very last second and get drilled if that is what it took to throw the receiver open.RaceBannon said:A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
It didn’t always work of course, but He did it a lot.
I didn’t see Eason do that against Stanford or Oregon. Once. -
Our OL results have been good. Not sure where this is coming from. We didn’t convert on short yardage situations against Oregon. That was more on Pleasant and the play call. USC was tough too, but we won.chuck said:
I dont even know if what I said was a part of your excuses post so my reply seems a little weird now. My only point was that UW has some good linemen that are more talented than the results they're getting. This will bear out in the draft.RaceBannon said:
That's great because I don't care about the NFLchuck said:
The nfl doesn't care whether an OL was on a winner or a loser team in college.RaceBannon said:Seeing a lot of excuses for poor line play and if you take out all the other teams good plays we were right there posts.
Not a great O line at all. Barely good if I want to be generous.
Winners win and grind the opposition to the dust. Losers have great reasons why we didn't
Lather rinse repeat
The OL opens holes in the running game and Eason has a clean pocket a lot. It’s not the best line in the country. It’s a good OL tho. This is stupid. They aren’t the reason for our struggles this year. They are more of a strength than a weakness.
-
Nope
