Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
A lot of posters here have never seen a good O line at UW
This isn't one
When you have Skinny doing the Browning you don't have good pass pro
I like to call it pass pro
And they get stuffed on short yardage and when it counts.
And they suck in the red zone
A good O line does what Oregon did and our last drive rams our purple cocks down their flat faced bills
Not getting to 3rd and 23
Eason doesn’t get sacked much. They aren’t bad at all. Pretty far down the list of problems.
We were fine in short yardage until Newton got hurt. We suck in the red zone for a lot of reasons. OL is one of them, sure.
They aren't good
At all
Disagree.
Playing the smurfs together hurt the offense big time and made the OL look bad. The WRs couldn't get open; Eason had no one to throw to and held the ball too long making him vulnerable for sacks on blitzes. Knowing our WRs sucked, defenses loaded up the box and limited our run game.
As soon as the offense began using Puka in the second half of the AZ game the offense and the line have been nails. They've scored 69 points the last four quarters --46 ppg average--the majority against Oregon one of the top defenses in the country without Dick and McGrew. During this span, the OL has allowed only 1 sack.
Excluding Kamaris wildcat guffaws and Eason's lost fumble, the offense generated more yards than Oregon.
It sucks Peterman and crue waited on using the younger WRs but I like where the Offense and the OL are right now.
What is more sad, that it took pete 2 loses to realize I need to play my WR even though they will fuck up because they don’t have the experience
The OLine players are fine. They're actually really good. There are at least two, probably three, future NFL starters on the starting line.
The problem isn't that they can't block. The problem is assignment fuckups and the untimely jailbreaks where the entire defensive front aeemingly pours into the backfield unblocked. There are assignments mistakes and unblocked defenders on every short yardage play and every obvious pass play. The blocking only holds up when the play call catches the defense out of position. Thata why Hamdan calls the fucked up game that he calls. Theres no faith that the offense can just line up and win at what it's good at because nobody really knows what that is.
Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
OTOH, they scored four TDs on the ground.
And after you take sacks out it was 3.8 yards per carry. Which isn't great but they ran the ball well enough to rack up 42 rushing attempts. They were moving the chains on the ground.
UW held the ball for 37.28 compared to just 22:32 for da U.
I'd say the purple OL handled their bidness that day.
Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
OTOH, they scored four TDs on the ground.
And after you take sacks out it was 3.8 yards per carry. Which isn't great but they ran the ball well enough to rack up 42 rushing attempts. They were moving the chains on the ground.
UW held the ball for 37.28 compared to just 22:32 for da U.
I'd say the purple OL handled their bidness that day.
Ok, but you can't take sacks out. It's part of the O line's performance.
The 2000 team had a good O line. I don't dispute that. I thought at the time that there would be more NFL careers coming out of that group than did, which I've never understood.
Back to the game, the most effective rusher other than Alexis' two runs was Tui, and I'm not sure how much credit goes to the O line. Tui had a great feel for the option that's hard to teach, and at that he was at 3.0 yards per carry.
Both teams had 3 turnovers, which factored into the game as much as anything.
The runner of the day was Clinton Portis, who averaged over 15 yds. per carry on 6 carries. Curiously, "Game Day" Butch didn't play him until well into the second half. He was the best player on the field for either team.
The OLine players are fine. They're actually really good. There are at least two, probably three, future NFL starters on the starting line.
The problem isn't that they can't block. The problem is assignment fuckups and the untimely jailbreaks where the entire defensive front aeemingly pours into the backfield unblocked. There are assignments mistakes and unblocked defenders on every short yardage play and every obvious pass play. The blocking only holds up when the play call catches the defense out of position. Thata why Hamdan calls the fucked up game that he calls. Theres no faith that the offense can just line up and win at what it's good at because nobody really knows what that is.
Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
OTOH, they scored four TDs on the ground.
And after you take sacks out it was 3.8 yards per carry. Which isn't great but they ran the ball well enough to rack up 42 rushing attempts. They were moving the chains on the ground.
UW held the ball for 37.28 compared to just 22:32 for da U.
I'd say the purple OL handled their bidness that day.
Ok, but you can't take sacks out. It's part of the O line's performance.
The 2000 team had a good O line. I don't dispute that. I thought at the time that there would be more NFL careers coming out of that group than did, which I've never understood.
Back to the game, the most effective rusher other than Alexis' two runs was Tui, and I'm not sure how much credit goes to the O line. Tui had a great feel for the option that's hard to teach, and at that he was at 3.0 yards per carry.
Both teams had 3 turnovers, which factored into the game as much as anything.
The runner of the day was Clinton Portis, who averaged over 15 yds. per carry on 6 carries. Curiously, "Game Day" Butch didn't play him until well into the second half. He was the best player on the field for either team.
I've said many times that if Portis played all game we looser.
Thankfully, he didn't.
Sacks are more about the QB than they are on the OL, btw.
Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
OTOH, they scored four TDs on the ground.
And after you take sacks out it was 3.8 yards per carry. Which isn't great but they ran the ball well enough to rack up 42 rushing attempts. They were moving the chains on the ground.
UW held the ball for 37.28 compared to just 22:32 for da U.
I'd say the purple OL handled their bidness that day.
Ok, but you can't take sacks out. It's part of the O line's performance.
The 2000 team had a good O line. I don't dispute that. I thought at the time that there would be more NFL careers coming out of that group than did, which I've never understood.
Back to the game, the most effective rusher other than Alexis' two runs was Tui, and I'm not sure how much credit goes to the O line. Tui had a great feel for the option that's hard to teach, and at that he was at 3.0 yards per carry.
Both teams had 3 turnovers, which factored into the game as much as anything.
The runner of the day was Clinton Portis, who averaged over 15 yds. per carry on 6 carries. Curiously, "Game Day" Butch didn't play him until well into the second half. He was the best player on the field for either team.
I've said many times that if Portis played all game we looser.
Thankfully, he didn't.
Sacks are more about the QB than they are on the OL, btw.
Often, yes. For Tui, my recollection is seldom. I don't pretend to remember the specifics of the sacks on him that day. But he was no Browning that's for sure.
The OLine players are fine. They're actually really good. There are at least two, probably three, future NFL starters on the starting line.
The problem isn't that they can't block. The problem is assignment fuckups and the untimely jailbreaks where the entire defensive front aeemingly pours into the backfield unblocked. There are assignments mistakes and unblocked defenders on every short yardage play and every obvious pass play. The blocking only holds up when the play call catches the defense out of position. Thata why Hamdan calls the fucked up game that he calls. Theres no faith that the offense can just line up and win at what it's good at because nobody really knows what that is.
Agreed. Too many unblocked defenders in the backfield or making tackles for no-gain.
Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
OTOH, they scored four TDs on the ground.
And after you take sacks out it was 3.8 yards per carry. Which isn't great but they ran the ball well enough to rack up 42 rushing attempts. They were moving the chains on the ground.
UW held the ball for 37.28 compared to just 22:32 for da U.
I'd say the purple OL handled their bidness that day.
Ok, but you can't take sacks out. It's part of the O line's performance.
The 2000 team had a good O line. I don't dispute that. I thought at the time that there would be more NFL careers coming out of that group than did, which I've never understood.
Back to the game, the most effective rusher other than Alexis' two runs was Tui, and I'm not sure how much credit goes to the O line. Tui had a great feel for the option that's hard to teach, and at that he was at 3.0 yards per carry.
Both teams had 3 turnovers, which factored into the game as much as anything.
The runner of the day was Clinton Portis, who averaged over 15 yds. per carry on 6 carries. Curiously, "Game Day" Butch didn't play him until well into the second half. He was the best player on the field for either team.
I've said many times that if Portis played all game we looser.
Thankfully, he didn't.
Sacks are more about the QB than they are on the OL, btw.
Often, yes. For Tui, my recollection is seldom. I don't pretend to remember the specifics of the sacks on him that day. But he was no Browning that's for sure.
Tui was like Russ, he wanted to make something magical happen on every play and oftentimes held onto the ball longer than he should have in hopes of doing so.
I love them both but they both take more sacks than an average QB would in the same situations.
You guys are having selective memories. This OL is probably better than 2000.
Ward was a better guard than anyone we have. Other than that, we are better at every other spot.
Adams > Silvers Kirkland > Fraze & and Dom Daste Harris > Benn Hilbers > Wes Call
The 2000 team ran the ball more and also had a running QB while this team has a pocket passer.
2000 team is much better because they won a Rose Bowl and popped off. However, they were a team that did more with less. They were tough and clutch when it counted and Pete’s teams have been the opposite of that.
The OLine players are fine. They're actually really good. There are at least two, probably three, future NFL starters on the starting line.
The problem isn't that they can't block. The problem is assignment fuckups and the untimely jailbreaks where the entire defensive front aeemingly pours into the backfield unblocked. There are assignments mistakes and unblocked defenders on every short yardage play and every obvious pass play. The blocking only holds up when the play call catches the defense out of position. Thata why Hamdan calls the fucked up game that he calls. Theres no faith that the offense can just line up and win at what it's good at because nobody really knows what that is.
The OLine players are fine. They're actually really good. There are at least two, probably three, future NFL starters on the starting line.
The problem isn't that they can't block. The problem is assignment fuckups and the untimely jailbreaks where the entire defensive front aeemingly pours into the backfield unblocked. There are assignments mistakes and unblocked defenders on every short yardage play and every obvious pass play. The blocking only holds up when the play call catches the defense out of position. Thata why Hamdan calls the fucked up game that he calls. Theres no faith that the offense can just line up and win at what it's good at because nobody really knows what that is.
Only GOOD oline I remember was 2000, and I was but a young pup so I don’t remember a whole lot other than they handled Miami. Good enough for me (and @creepycoug))))
I get to see plenty of great DAWG lines play for my TIDE, though. Like the other smart guys said, good DAWG lines kick your ass when it counts even if they are facing a GOOD d line that fills sleeves and makes you say aweee.
This was evident after Cal when Weaver didn’t get punched in the throat repeatedly.
If you want to call 2.78 yds. per carry "handling", then OK! Imagine what it would have been w/o Rich Alexis' 2 two big runs.
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
And another take away anything good the opponent did and we were great post
Take away 65 points in 2001 and UW takes that game to over time
You guys are having selective memories. This OL is probably better than 2000.
Ward was a better guard than anyone we have. Other than that, we are better at every other spot.
Adams > Silvers Kirkland > Fraze & and Dom Daste Harris > Benn Hilbers > Wes Call
The 2000 team ran the ball more and also had a running QB while this team has a pocket passer.
2000 team is much better because they won a Rose Bowl and popped off. However, they were a team that did more with less. They were tough and clutch when it counted and Pete’s teams have been the opposite of that.
Comments
Such fag, J. Such fag.
I do, however, agree that Washington Damnit! could use an old school Husky lineman. One of the grumpy nasty fuckers like a Kreutz or a Frank Garcia. Guys who other players on the team are legitimately afraid of pissing off.
Other problems in coverage, and tackling are fixable or at least can be improved this year.
Better WRs are already here, but not playing enough.
LBs? This will be a problem for years to come yet.
The problem isn't that they can't block. The problem is assignment fuckups and the untimely jailbreaks where the entire defensive front aeemingly pours into the backfield unblocked. There are assignments mistakes and unblocked defenders on every short yardage play and every obvious pass play. The blocking only holds up when the play call catches the defense out of position. Thata why Hamdan calls the fucked up game that he calls. Theres no faith that the offense can just line up and win at what it's good at because nobody really knows what that is.
And after you take sacks out it was 3.8 yards per carry. Which isn't great but they ran the ball well enough to rack up 42 rushing attempts. They were moving the chains on the ground.
UW held the ball for 37.28 compared to just 22:32 for da U.
I'd say the purple OL handled their bidness that day.
The 2000 team had a good O line. I don't dispute that. I thought at the time that there would be more NFL careers coming out of that group than did, which I've never understood.
Back to the game, the most effective rusher other than Alexis' two runs was Tui, and I'm not sure how much credit goes to the O line. Tui had a great feel for the option that's hard to teach, and at that he was at 3.0 yards per carry.
Both teams had 3 turnovers, which factored into the game as much as anything.
The runner of the day was Clinton Portis, who averaged over 15 yds. per carry on 6 carries. Curiously, "Game Day" Butch didn't play him until well into the second half. He was the best player on the field for either team.
Thankfully, he didn't.
Sacks are more about the QB than they are on the OL, btw.
The curse of Beta Football.
I love them both but they both take more sacks than an average QB would in the same situations.
They also manufacture more big plays.
It's a tradeoff.
Ward was a better guard than anyone we have. Other than that, we are better at every other spot.
Adams > Silvers
Kirkland > Fraze & and Dom Daste
Harris > Benn
Hilbers > Wes Call
The 2000 team ran the ball more and also had a running QB while this team has a pocket passer.
2000 team is much better because they won a Rose Bowl and popped off. However, they were a team that did more with less. They were tough and clutch when it counted and Pete’s teams have been the opposite of that.
Not a great O line at all. Barely good if I want to be generous.
Winners win and grind the opposition to the dust. Losers have great reasons why we didn't
Lather rinse repeat
Take away 65 points in 2001 and UW takes that game to over time
Who cares about anything else.
Dom Daste is the toughest player of my lifetime
Stars don't measure that