Day when Gore must regret inventing the internet
Comments
-
One of the biggest vs barely top 10.SFGbob said:
Let me guess, you meant to talk out your ass.ThomasFremont said:
It wasn’t a wave?? Weird. Everyone disagrees with you.SFGbob said:Hey Tommy were you just "joking" when you stuck your head up your ass in that other thread?
Tiny margin? It was one of the largest waves in Congressional election history. But sure.
I only bring it up here because for some odd reason you ran and hid like a fucking Kunt from that other thread.
It was a wave Tommy no one is denying that but far from being “one of the largest waves in Congressional history” it barely makes the top 10 in Congressional history since 1932.
So which is it? Liar or dumbfuck?
Tomato, toe maw toe.
Wow, you really got me there. -
Fuck you Tommy, if I had bothered to take it back further than 1932 I’m sure I could have pushed it out of even making the top 10. There was nothing historical about the Rats picking up that many seats in midterms, in fact it pretty much followed historical norms.ThomasFremont said:
One of the biggest vs barely top 10.SFGbob said:
Let me guess, you meant to talk out your ass.ThomasFremont said:
It wasn’t a wave?? Weird. Everyone disagrees with you.SFGbob said:Hey Tommy were you just "joking" when you stuck your head up your ass in that other thread?
Tiny margin? It was one of the largest waves in Congressional election history. But sure.
I only bring it up here because for some odd reason you ran and hid like a fucking Kunt from that other thread.
It was a wave Tommy no one is denying that but far from being “one of the largest waves in Congressional history” it barely makes the top 10 in Congressional history since 1932.
So which is it? Liar or dumbfuck?
Tomato, toe maw toe.
Wow, you really got me there.
You talked right out your fucking ass which appears to be a pattern with you. -
The norm? A wave is defined as a 20 seat swing. 2018 was double that.SFGbob said:
Fuck you Tommy, if I had bothered to take it back further than 1932 I’m sure I could have pushed it out of even making the top 10. There was nothing historical about the Rats picking up that many seats in midterms, in fact it pretty much followed historical norms.ThomasFremont said:
One of the biggest vs barely top 10.SFGbob said:
Let me guess, you meant to talk out your ass.ThomasFremont said:
It wasn’t a wave?? Weird. Everyone disagrees with you.SFGbob said:Hey Tommy were you just "joking" when you stuck your head up your ass in that other thread?
Tiny margin? It was one of the largest waves in Congressional election history. But sure.
I only bring it up here because for some odd reason you ran and hid like a fucking Kunt from that other thread.
It was a wave Tommy no one is denying that but far from being “one of the largest waves in Congressional history” it barely makes the top 10 in Congressional history since 1932.
So which is it? Liar or dumbfuck?
Tomato, toe maw toe.
Wow, you really got me there.
You talked right out your fucking ass which appears to be a pattern with you.
Nobody is surprised that a Duck is bad at historical records. -
Ironic.SFGbob said:
Fuck you Tommy, if I had bothered to take it back further than 1932 I’m sure I could have pushed it out of even making the top 10. There was nothing historical about the Rats picking up that many seats in midterms, in fact it pretty much followed historical norms.ThomasFremont said:
One of the biggest vs barely top 10.SFGbob said:
Let me guess, you meant to talk out your ass.ThomasFremont said:
It wasn’t a wave?? Weird. Everyone disagrees with you.SFGbob said:Hey Tommy were you just "joking" when you stuck your head up your ass in that other thread?
Tiny margin? It was one of the largest waves in Congressional election history. But sure.
I only bring it up here because for some odd reason you ran and hid like a fucking Kunt from that other thread.
It was a wave Tommy no one is denying that but far from being “one of the largest waves in Congressional history” it barely makes the top 10 in Congressional history since 1932.
So which is it? Liar or dumbfuck?
Tomato, toe maw toe.
Wow, you really got me there.
You talked right out your fucking ass which appears to be a pattern with you. -
You really do need to take the L here. This is cringeworthyThomasFremont said:
Thanks for showing us all again that you failed to see the point in that thread too.SFGbob said:
Watch out folks Tommy is about to go nuclear again defending Jane Fonda's honor. Who is "they" Kunt?ThomasFremont said:
Nobody is talking to your boring ass.SFGbob said:
When you say "they" are you really talking about Rats Tommy? or do you see all Rats as the N-word?ThomasFremont said:
Looking forward to your long form thesis on why white people should be able to say the n-word.RaceBannon said:They?
Nadler?
McDermott?
The left doesn't control the language or words or who gets to use them
Hope this helps and that was a really fucked up defense Thomas
Now go away, I’ve got Race on the line, and you’re ruining the magic. -
Did Clinton say it?RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flashback-top-dems-including-nadler-called-clinton-impeachment-lynching
Even as top Democrats rushed to condemn President Trump's comparison of their impeachment inquiry to a "lynching," footage and news reports have emerged showing top Democrats referring matter-of-factly to Bill Clinton's impeachment proceedings as a "lynching" in 1998.
Among those Democrats are two African-American representatives still serving in the House, as well as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y.
Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., called Clinton's impeachment a "persecution" and a "political lynching" on the House floor in 1998. And Danny Davis, D-Ill., condemned what he described as a "lynching in the People's House."
Jim McDermott, D-Wash., warned of the "political lynch" mob that was forming, and suggested that "we are going to find a rope, find a tree, and ask ... questions later."
The quote from Nadler read: "I am the president’s defender in the sense that I haven’t seen anything yet that would rise, in my opinion, to the level of impeachable offense. … I wish we could get this over with quickly. … In pushing the process, in pushing the arguments of fairness and due process the Republicans so far have been running a lynch mob."
IMO Trump knew this when he tweeted it
Democrats lose again
No?
-
Clinton was a big dick candidate with an elite brain. Better get on board now.dflea said:
Did Clinton say it?RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flashback-top-dems-including-nadler-called-clinton-impeachment-lynching
Even as top Democrats rushed to condemn President Trump's comparison of their impeachment inquiry to a "lynching," footage and news reports have emerged showing top Democrats referring matter-of-factly to Bill Clinton's impeachment proceedings as a "lynching" in 1998.
Among those Democrats are two African-American representatives still serving in the House, as well as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y.
Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., called Clinton's impeachment a "persecution" and a "political lynching" on the House floor in 1998. And Danny Davis, D-Ill., condemned what he described as a "lynching in the People's House."
Jim McDermott, D-Wash., warned of the "political lynch" mob that was forming, and suggested that "we are going to find a rope, find a tree, and ask ... questions later."
The quote from Nadler read: "I am the president’s defender in the sense that I haven’t seen anything yet that would rise, in my opinion, to the level of impeachable offense. … I wish we could get this over with quickly. … In pushing the process, in pushing the arguments of fairness and due process the Republicans so far have been running a lynch mob."
IMO Trump knew this when he tweeted it
Democrats lose again
No? -
So what?dflea said:
Did Clinton say it?RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flashback-top-dems-including-nadler-called-clinton-impeachment-lynching
Even as top Democrats rushed to condemn President Trump's comparison of their impeachment inquiry to a "lynching," footage and news reports have emerged showing top Democrats referring matter-of-factly to Bill Clinton's impeachment proceedings as a "lynching" in 1998.
Among those Democrats are two African-American representatives still serving in the House, as well as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y.
Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., called Clinton's impeachment a "persecution" and a "political lynching" on the House floor in 1998. And Danny Davis, D-Ill., condemned what he described as a "lynching in the People's House."
Jim McDermott, D-Wash., warned of the "political lynch" mob that was forming, and suggested that "we are going to find a rope, find a tree, and ask ... questions later."
The quote from Nadler read: "I am the president’s defender in the sense that I haven’t seen anything yet that would rise, in my opinion, to the level of impeachable offense. … I wish we could get this over with quickly. … In pushing the process, in pushing the arguments of fairness and due process the Republicans so far have been running a lynch mob."
IMO Trump knew this when he tweeted it
Democrats lose again
No? -
Joe Biden called it a lynching. Bubba had a lot of defenders. Quick search hasn't found anything from Bill yet
-
It was just a question. No need to get carried away.
Defending stupidity with more stupidity is a curious tactic, though. Did you mistake me for a Biden ballwasher?
