I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.
Just my two cents here.
APAG wants African-Americans to continue to be born out-of-wedlock and struggle in poverty, just so he can defend their rights and feel self-righteous about himself.
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.
Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.
This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of.
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of.
Taboo to mention that. What would the libs do without their pawns? They need all those fatherless homes to hang onto their power.
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of.
Taboo to mention that. What would the libs do without their pawns? They need all those fatherless homes to hang onto their power.
Well you can see what happens right here when you do talk about it. Leftists will scream racism. Btw, do you think any of these white liberals encourage any of their children to have kids out of wedlock? Of course not.
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
All you need to do is look at the family status of every person who drops out of high school, ends up in prison, abuses drugs, grows up living in poverty and you'll find that the majority of every person in any of those categories were born out of wedlock and or live in a single parent household.
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of.
"And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.
But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
No, I do not think that.
Incarceration Rates "Young men who grow up in homes without fathers are twice as likely to end up in jail as those who come from traditional two-parent families...those boys whose fathers were absent from the household had double the odds of being incarcerated -- even when other factors such as race, income, parent education and urban residence were held constant." (Harper C, McLanahan SS. Cited in Father Absence and Youth Incarceration. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2004.)
But APAG doesn't think it would be better if there were less kids being raised by a single parent.
Less kids being raised by a single parent and 95% of all children being born into a mom-dad environment are completely different questions.
Oh there he goes with the old rat two step. Now kobe is going to try and angle this loser argument to something that was never even part of the discussion. He lost the argument because he was all FEELINGS upped and facts made him look ridiculous.
Comments
SJW FTW
Kids being born out of wedlock is the biggest driver of nearly all social pathologies you can think of.
Incarceration Rates
"Young men who grow up in homes without fathers are twice as likely to end up in jail as those who come from traditional two-parent families...those boys whose fathers were absent from the household had double the odds of being incarcerated -- even when other factors such as race, income, parent education and urban residence were held constant." (Harper C, McLanahan SS. Cited in Father Absence and Youth Incarceration. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2004.)
But APAG doesn't think it would be better if there were less kids being raised by a single parent.