Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

If liberals were really serious about doing something about poverty...

2

Comments

  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,521
    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    Thanks for giving him an out. Steve Nash couldn't have delivered a better lob.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,090
    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    I don't. After watching his act here for the last few months this is just what he does.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,805

    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    Thanks for giving him an out. Steve Nash couldn't have delivered a better lob.
    Racist.








    But accurate.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    How dare you.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    Gwad said:

    In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed laws that created a 100 to 1 sentencing disparity for the possession or trafficking of crack when compared to penalties for trafficking of powder cocaine,[2][3][4][5] which had been widely criticized as discriminatory against minorities, mostly African-Americans, who were more likely to use crack than powder cocaine.[6] This 100:1 ratio had been required under federal law since 1986.[16] Persons convicted in federal court of possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine received a minimum mandatory sentence of 5 years in federal prison. On the other hand, possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same sentence.[3][4] In 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act cut the sentencing disparity to 18:1.[6]

    In the year 2000, the number of incarcerated African Americans had become 26 times the amount it had been in 1983.[citation needed]

    In 2012, 88% of imprisonments from crack cocaine were African American. Further, the data shows the discrepancy between lengths of sentences of crack cocaine and heroin. The majority of crack imprisonments are placed in the 10–20 year range, while the imprisonments related to heroin use or possession range from 5–10 years which has led many to question and analyze the role race plays in this disparity.[17]

    Christ. This again? It's not the drugs, dummy. It's about the bodies, Yo.

    NOGAF about people sitting around getting high. But when innocent bodies caught in the crossfire start piling up, a lot of motherfuckers profiting off the substance that fuels the violence are going to jail.

    And I'm fine with that. Just like a lot of AA moms and organizations that grew tired and weary of burying their teenage sons were back in '94. Call me, and all of them, whatever the fuck you want.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    No

    He's not

    Single parent stats have been his trigger for years

    Simply pointing those stats out is racist to the party of science and reason
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,473 Standard Supporter
    The left has controlled minority populations via Planned parenthood. Always the plan Just ask Margret! Dems have run with it and pushed it with tax payer money. Maybe if they get full control they can install the gas chambers.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,521

    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    How dare you.
    Running for cover I see
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Here comes old man Race, lumbering into the ring.

    Most black children live with their father.

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2015/6/21/8820537/black-fathers-day

    I’m not taking Bob or his statistics seriously because I’ve linked this study before. And guess how much Damone cared that what he was saying was a complete lie? About as much as Bob will when he finds out.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club

    Here comes old man Race, lumbering into the ring.

    Most black children live with their father.

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2015/6/21/8820537/black-fathers-day

    I’m not taking Bob or his statistics seriously because I’ve linked this study before. And guess how much Damone cared that what he was saying was a complete lie? About as much as Bob will when he finds out.

    Your the one making it about race

    Still

    Hope this helps

    And this "study" doesn't make the statistics a lie
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,090

    Here comes old man Race, lumbering into the ring.

    Most black children live with their father.

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2015/6/21/8820537/black-fathers-day

    I’m not taking Bob or his statistics seriously because I’ve linked this study before. And guess how much Damone cared that what he was saying was a complete lie? About as much as Bob will when he finds out.

    Guess how much your statistics don’t refute a fucking word I said.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    SFGbob said:



    Here comes old man Race, lumbering into the ring.

    Most black children live with their father.

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2015/6/21/8820537/black-fathers-day

    I’m not taking Bob or his statistics seriously because I’ve linked this study before. And guess how much Damone cared that what he was saying was a complete lie? About as much as Bob will when he finds out.

    Guess how much your statistics don’t refute a fucking word I said.
    See?
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    SFGbob said:

    they'd do something to address these facts:

    When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.

    Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.

    This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.

    This post has nothing to do with race.

    Father Time remains undefeated.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    they'd do something to address these facts:

    When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.

    Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.

    This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.

    This post has nothing to do with race.

    Father Time remains undefeated.
    Are the statistics real or not?
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,272 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    This.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,090

    SFGbob said:

    they'd do something to address these facts:

    When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.

    Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.

    This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.

    This post has nothing to do with race.

    Father Time remains undefeated.
    Are the statistics real or not?
    Whether they are real or not the are definitely racist.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    SFGbob said:

    they'd do something to address these facts:

    When Moynihan wrote in 1965 on the coming destruction of the Black family, the out-of-wedlock birth rate was 25% among Blacks. In 1991, 68% of Black children were born outside of marriage. In 2011, 72% of Black babies were born to unmarried mothers.

    Today those numbers are about 77% for blacks and 49% for Hispanics.

    This is the real driver of poverty and pretty much every other social ill you can think of, in America today.

    This post has nothing to do with race.

    Father Time remains undefeated.
    Are the statistics real or not?
    Who said they weren’t real?
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,572 Founders Club

    Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.

    Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.

    What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.

    He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html

    The last paragraph is quite interesting:

    "And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.

    But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
    This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
    You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter

    Every social ill in America is the fault of people of color.

    Imagine typing that out while thinking you’re not the racist.

    What do you suggest we do, Bob? I would love to hear from the non racist how he plans to control the birth rate of people of color.

    He doesn't need to. Your boy Bernie did that form him.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html

    The last paragraph is quite interesting:

    "And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd. So I think especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support," he concluded.

    But since it's under the umbrella of climate change, it's totally cool. Am I right APAG?
    This is giving women the choice on having a child or not. Bob is advocating for government controlled eugenics.
    You don't think society would be better off if 95% of our kids were born into a mom-dad family environment?
    Progressive Sacrilege!!!
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,572 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    I think APAG's intentionally misrepresenting SFG's argument to fuck with him.

    Just my two cents here.

    APAG wants African-Americans to continue to be born out-of-wedlock and struggle in poverty, just so he can defend their rights and feel self-righteous about himself.
Sign In or Register to comment.