Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

When facts don’t fit the narrative ...

13»

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,091
    edited October 2019

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    Ok. So tell me more about mass shootings. What’s the definition? You’re the only one mentioning trump. You seem angry murders are declining. That’s weird.
    Hondo obviously thought you were trying to say something you never said. And what the fuck does Trump have to do with any of this?

    I can only imagine the kind of "arguments" this retard has with his wife.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,091
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    Ok. So tell me more about mass shootings. What’s the definition? You’re the only one mentioning trump. You seem angry murders are declining. That’s weird.
    Hondo obviously thought you were trying to say something you never said. And what the fuck does Trump have to do with any of this?

    I can only imagine the kind of "arguments" this retard has with his wife.
    As usual, Hondo makes an ass out of himself and then runs and hides.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,473 Standard Supporter
    It's not about gun control. It's about people control. As long as we are armed they can't install their socialist/communist utopia. The left has an agenda and they are out of the closet.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Again with your "it's a tiny percentage, so STFU". That's the dumbest argument ever. You do understand why a dude shooting into an innocent crowd gets more news coverage than two gang members in Chicago shooting each other. Right?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,091
    2001400ex said:

    Again with your "it's a tiny percentage, so STFU". That's the dumbest argument ever. You do understand why a dude shooting into an innocent crowd gets more news coverage than two gang members in Chicago shooting each other. Right?
    Not if the "dude" shooting into an innocent crowd is black and the people being shot are black.

    You have mass shootings that fit that bill all the fucking time and they get very little coverage outside of their local media.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,473 Standard Supporter
    But they will count it as a mass shooting since it's only 3 or 4 people and then ask to ban assault weapons whether they were involved or not.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Again with your "it's a tiny percentage, so STFU". That's the dumbest argument ever. You do understand why a dude shooting into an innocent crowd gets more news coverage than two gang members in Chicago shooting each other. Right?
    “News” vs facts. That’s the point idiot. “News” controls the narrative. And it’s not in line with the facts. I’m not surprised Hondo is confused over this. Imagine being mad that murder rates are dropping.
Sign In or Register to comment.