When facts don’t fit the narrative ...

MikeDamone

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

2001400ex

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

Sledog

MikeDamone said:

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

2001400ex

Sledog said:

MikeDamone said:

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.

I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

MikeDamone said:

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.

I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.

Seriously, you don’t get the point? You are truly one dumb mother fucker. Embarrassing

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

I don’t speak retard, so since you disagree with the article, tell me what you disagree with. In your own words.

You must be in the “pissed off” group that is alluded to at the end of the quote.

Are you mad that murder rates are dropping?

Sledog

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

MikeDamone said:

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.

I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.

Surprised a liberal/commie like you hasn't proposed that. After all blacks make up 13% of the population and commit more than 50% of the violent crime in out country so why haven't you called for a ban on them? All long guns are usually about 3% of the murders and misnamed "assault weapons" comprise only a fraction of that yet you want them banned. Why aren't you red's applying that logic in other places? Like the fact most mass shooters are democrats. We need a ban on democrats!

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

I don’t speak retard, so since you disagree with the article, tell me what you disagree with. In your own words.

You must be in the “pissed off” group that is alluded to at the end of the quote.

Are you mad that murder rates are dropping?

It's great that murder rates are dropping. I already talked about one question I have about the article. You are free to go back and look. Now your turn Mike. You too dumb to articulate any points about the article? I thought it was a non partisan post Mike?

2001400ex

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

MikeDamone said:

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.

I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.

Surprised a liberal/commie like you hasn't proposed that. After all blacks make up 13% of the population and commit more than 50% of the violent crime in out country so why haven't you called for a ban on them? All long guns are usually about 3% of the murders and misnamed "assault weapons" comprise only a fraction of that yet you want them banned. Why aren't you red's applying that logic in other places? Like the fact most mass shooters are democrats. We need a ban on democrats!

That's a lie. Idiot.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

I don’t speak retard, so since you disagree with the article, tell me what you disagree with. In your own words.

You must be in the “pissed off” group that is alluded to at the end of the quote.

Are you mad that murder rates are dropping?

It's great that murder rates are dropping. I already talked about one question I have about the article. You are free to go back and look. Now your turn Mike. You too dumb to articulate any points about the article? I thought it was a non partisan post Mike?

Mass shootings is your question? And why they aren’t included? Your typical straw man attempt, but I already asked what facts would you like to present that the author is supposedly avoiding. You had no answer.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

2001400ex said:

Sledog said:

MikeDamone said:

The facts are ignored.

“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.

I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:

-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)

-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.

-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.

-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.

For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”

https://memepoliceman.com/analyzing-the-2018-fbi-homicide-data/

Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.

I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.

Surprised a liberal/commie like you hasn't proposed that. After all blacks make up 13% of the population and commit more than 50% of the violent crime in out country so why haven't you called for a ban on them? All long guns are usually about 3% of the murders and misnamed "assault weapons" comprise only a fraction of that yet you want them banned. Why aren't you red's applying that logic in other places? Like the fact most mass shooters are democrats. We need a ban on democrats!

That's a lie. Idiot.

Link?

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

I don’t speak retard, so since you disagree with the article, tell me what you disagree with. In your own words.

You must be in the “pissed off” group that is alluded to at the end of the quote.

Are you mad that murder rates are dropping?

It's great that murder rates are dropping. I already talked about one question I have about the article. You are free to go back and look. Now your turn Mike. You too dumb to articulate any points about the article? I thought it was a non partisan post Mike?

Mass shootings is your question? And why they aren’t included? Your typical straw man attempt, but I already asked what facts would you like to present that the author is supposedly avoiding. You had no answer.

Umm what? That's awesome. You acknowledge I'm asking about mass shootings as there's no mention in the article. Then you wonder what question I have that's not in the article. El oh fucking El. Nice work Mike.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Which narrative are you trying to squash?

The fact you’re an idiot will never be squashed.

Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.

So you can't articulate anything. Got it.

The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?

Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.

You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.

My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.

You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.

Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.

Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?

You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.

What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?

Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.

I don’t speak retard, so since you disagree with the article, tell me what you disagree with. In your own words.

You must be in the “pissed off” group that is alluded to at the end of the quote.

Are you mad that murder rates are dropping?

It's great that murder rates are dropping. I already talked about one question I have about the article. You are free to go back and look. Now your turn Mike. You too dumb to articulate any points about the article? I thought it was a non partisan post Mike?

Mass shootings is your question? And why they aren’t included? Your typical straw man attempt, but I already asked what facts would you like to present that the author is supposedly avoiding. You had no answer.

Umm what? That's awesome. You acknowledge I'm asking about mass shootings as there's no mention in the article. Then you wonder what question I have that's not in the article. El oh fucking El. Nice work Mike.

Again, you brought up mass shootings. What is your question? Use your words. All murders are in the stats. What specifically are you asking?