Reading for comprehension is still something that escapes you.
So you can't articulate anything. Got it.
The quote and article speaks for itself. The fact you can’t comprehend it isn’t my problem, nor is it surprising. What in the article confuses you and why does it anger you so much?
Nothing in the article angers me. I was actually asking for a discussion and wondering was narratives you were trying to squash. But you just angry posted a couple times with nothing to add. Exactly what I was expecting.
You seem pissed. Did I say I was trying to squash a narrative? More poor comprehension. Just anger from you at something you can’t grasp.
My guess is you’re the only one here who needs to be spoon fed. It’s not even a partisan post. Yet you can’t figure it out. As usual. Idiot.
You said when facts don't fit the narrative. Facts get ignored. You must be squashing some narrative then.
Then after you whining about be adding words to your mouth. You then actually add words to my mouth.
Funny how the article doesn't say anything about mass shootings. Wonder why that is? Maybe cause the facts didn't fit his narrative?
You seem upset that you can’t figure it out. Or are you just mad something is presenting facts that don’t fit your narrative. The narratives ignored are in the article. (Which you didn’t read, obviously. Because that’s hard) If you disagree, articulate it. Rather than being an angry dipshit, as usual. I’m not squashing anything. I didn’t write the article or the post in quotes.
What narrative on mass shootings would you like to bring facts to?
Ok Mike. Let's start here. What was your point for posting this article. Articulate in your words your thought process.
Mike, ignore this dumb motherfucker. He is the lowest of the low.
The info you provided was fascinating and a good read. THX
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
The numbers actually look worse when you take into account that whites still make up over 60% of the population and blacks are only 13%. And for purposes of crime statistics Hispanics killing blacks are often tabulated as whites killing blacks.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
“The latest FBI crime numbers for 2018 were released last week. They got little media coverage, probably because they were fairly positive so there was no anti-Trump angle, but not so positive that the pro-Trump crowd could gloat.
I examined all of the homicide data and wrote down the highlights and potential narratives, which I think many of you will find interesting. Some highlights of the highlights:
-Murder victims dropped by over 1,000 (6.6%)
-The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
-Despite the hoopla surrounding “assault rifles”, rifle murders plunged and were less than 1/20th of handgun murders. Knives and “personal weapons” (fists, feet, etc.) killed far more than rifles.
-Major cities (which tend to be Democrat controlled) led the decline in murders, with a few notable exceptions. For example, Chicago and Baltimore both had big declines, Philly and DC had increases.
For all the data check out the link, I lay out many narratives based on it that will please (and piss off) both sides. I also identify the most and least dangerous cities and states, enjoy!”
Rifles/long guns are ALWAYS a tiny percentage of murders. It's hard to put an AR in your pocket or waistband.
I came back expecting something dumb from you like "we should ban knives, blunt objects, and black people". Realized you actually have something more idiotic to say about the topic.
Surprised a liberal/commie like you hasn't proposed that. After all blacks make up 13% of the population and commit more than 50% of the violent crime in out country so why haven't you called for a ban on them? All long guns are usually about 3% of the murders and misnamed "assault weapons" comprise only a fraction of that yet you want them banned. Why aren't you red's applying that logic in other places? Like the fact most mass shooters are democrats. We need a ban on democrats!
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
I put something to the test because of this thread.
I put my AR15 down my pants and walked around all day. it was uncomfortable as hell. Some friends came by and asked if I was having trouble with my privates. I thought that was offensive, tried to pull the AR15 out of my pants to scare them but they left before I finished.
I asked Mrs Lebam to shoot me with her Desert Eagle but she missed.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.
Why should his numbers break out "mass shootings" when the numbers are for everyone murdered through every form of homicide you can think of? They aren't just homicides by firearms Hondo, so why should they break out the numbers for just mass shootings?
The total number of homicides includes everyone murdered in a mass shooting.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass and lie. Nice work dumbfuck.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.
Hondo, don't blame the reader for the fact that you write like a fucking retard.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
That statement by you is a fucking lie. If you wanted people to come up with what the fuck you're trying to say you should stop writing like a fucking moron. Because what you said, isn't true.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
Ok. So tell me more about mass shootings. What’s the definition? You’re the only one mentioning trump. You seem angry murders are declining. That’s weird.
The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.
White privilege.
Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
What's a homiacide?
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.
Comments
White privilege.
The info you provided was fascinating and a good read. THX
Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
Just like it was "racist" to accurately say that Affirmative Action discriminates against whites and Asians based upon skin color.
And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.
But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
I put my AR15 down my pants and walked around all day. it was uncomfortable as hell. Some friends came by and asked if I was having trouble with my privates. I thought that was offensive, tried to pull the AR15 out of my pants to scare them but they left before I finished.
I asked Mrs Lebam to shoot me with her Desert Eagle but she missed.
this proves guns don't kill.
Mrs Lebam also thinks I should quit smoking weed
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Which is a lie.
But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
The total number of homicides includes everyone murdered in a mass shooting.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass and lie. Nice work dumbfuck.
Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.
That statement by you is a fucking lie. If you wanted people to come up with what the fuck you're trying to say you should stop writing like a fucking moron. Because what you said, isn't true.