Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

When facts don’t fit the narrative ...

2»

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
    Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,793 Swaye's Wigwam
    I put something to the test because of this thread.

    I put my AR15 down my pants and walked around all day. it was uncomfortable as hell. Some friends came by and asked if I was having trouble with my privates. I thought that was offensive, tried to pull the AR15 out of my pants to scare them but they left before I finished.

    I asked Mrs Lebam to shoot me with her Desert Eagle but she missed.

    this proves guns don't kill.

    Mrs Lebam also thinks I should quit smoking weed
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
    Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
    Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:

    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Which is a lie.

    But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
    Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
    Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:

    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Which is a lie.

    But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
    Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?

    You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
    Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
    Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:

    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Which is a lie.

    But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
    Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?

    You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
    The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
    Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
    Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:

    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Which is a lie.

    But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
    Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?

    You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
    The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
    Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Why should his numbers break out "mass shootings" when the numbers are for everyone murdered through every form of homicide you can think of? They aren't just homicides by firearms Hondo, so why should they break out the numbers for just mass shootings?

    The total number of homicides includes everyone murdered in a mass shooting.

    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass and lie. Nice work dumbfuck.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
    Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
    Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:

    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Which is a lie.

    But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
    Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?

    You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
    The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
    Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.
    Hondo, don't blame the reader for the fact that you write like a fucking retard.



    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    That statement by you is a fucking lie. If you wanted people to come up with what the fuck you're trying to say you should stop writing like a fucking moron. Because what you said, isn't true.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    Ok. So tell me more about mass shootings. What’s the definition? You’re the only one mentioning trump. You seem angry murders are declining. That’s weird.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,893 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    And how do you know that those numbers don’t include mass shooting murders Hondo?
    Bob STFU.. You have no idea what I'm even saying. And this comment shows it. Neither does Mike..
    Well Hondo, as always everyone knows what you're really saying. You want to suck dick. But after that, you're saying:

    Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Which is a lie.

    But what would a thread involving you be without a lie and a plaintive cry for dick.
    Read the analysis idiot. Does he mention anything about the number of people killed by mass shootings?

    You know Bob, I set up a trap for you that you just fell for. Nice work. Sometimes it's easier to just let people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
    The numbers are for all homicides in the US. Those numbers include people killed in mass shootings. Your "trap" was to shove your head up your ass, lie, and than ask to suck dick.
    Read his analysis. Then read my statement. Fuck I've had better arguments with my wife.
    I'm sure your wife always wins.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited October 2019

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    Ok. So tell me more about mass shootings. What’s the definition? You’re the only one mentioning trump. You seem angry murders are declining. That’s weird.
    Hondo obviously thought you were trying to say something you never said. And what the fuck does Trump have to do with any of this?

    I can only imagine the kind of "arguments" this retard has with his wife.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    The number of whites killing blacks was less than half of blacks killing whites. However, both categories declined considerably, a positive sign.


    White privilege.

    Sounds like mass shootings don’t fit your narrative. Right Hondo?
    First is all. I knew Bob would go racist.

    Secondly. Yes mass shooting stats are left out of your "non partisan" analysis.

    Yet you still can't articulate your point. Nice work man!!
    You can’t explain why mass shootings aren’t “part of the narrative” is pertinent since all homiacides are included. Can’t you read? I have no idea why your vag is sandy about mass shootings. It’s your strawman. You tell me.
    What's a homiacide?

    And yes the number of mass shootings is relevant. I'll type slowly Mike so maybe you'll understand. There's a huge difference in two criminals shooting each other and someone opening fire in an unsuspecting crowd.

    But keep up your "non partisan" narrative that Trump is good for murders.
    Ok. So tell me more about mass shootings. What’s the definition? You’re the only one mentioning trump. You seem angry murders are declining. That’s weird.
    Hondo obviously thought you were trying to say something you never said. And what the fuck does Trump have to do with any of this?

    I can only imagine the kind of "arguments" this retard has with his wife.
    As usual, Hondo makes an ass out of himself and then runs and hides.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,893 Standard Supporter
    It's not about gun control. It's about people control. As long as we are armed they can't install their socialist/communist utopia. The left has an agenda and they are out of the closet.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Again with your "it's a tiny percentage, so STFU". That's the dumbest argument ever. You do understand why a dude shooting into an innocent crowd gets more news coverage than two gang members in Chicago shooting each other. Right?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    Again with your "it's a tiny percentage, so STFU". That's the dumbest argument ever. You do understand why a dude shooting into an innocent crowd gets more news coverage than two gang members in Chicago shooting each other. Right?
    Not if the "dude" shooting into an innocent crowd is black and the people being shot are black.

    You have mass shootings that fit that bill all the fucking time and they get very little coverage outside of their local media.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,893 Standard Supporter
    But they will count it as a mass shooting since it's only 3 or 4 people and then ask to ban assault weapons whether they were involved or not.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Again with your "it's a tiny percentage, so STFU". That's the dumbest argument ever. You do understand why a dude shooting into an innocent crowd gets more news coverage than two gang members in Chicago shooting each other. Right?
    “News” vs facts. That’s the point idiot. “News” controls the narrative. And it’s not in line with the facts. I’m not surprised Hondo is confused over this. Imagine being mad that murder rates are dropping.