Scott Huff and our mighty O Line

PostGameOrangeSlices

Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again

They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.

Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.

What's the deal?

bananasnblondes

Our o line has not really been a problem this year. USC's d line is really good.

FireCohen

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again

They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.

Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.

What's the deal?

Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were fine

PostGameOrangeSlices

FirePete said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again

They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.

Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.

What's the deal?

Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were fine

Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.

DawgDaze71

Eason took one hard hit. I'd say that's a win for the OL. That being said as much talent as this group has the next OL man child that take the field will have a higher ceiling and may be mammoth.

MikeDamone

bananasnblondes said:

Our o line has not really been a problem this year. USC's d line is really good.

That is a GOOD USC D line

CuntWaffle

Huff's top recruits are redshirting or redshirt freshman. The ghost of Strausser's recruiting is currently haunting us. Was Strausser a better O Line coach? Probably, but his recruiting was garbage.

Thump

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

FirePete said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again

They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.

Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.

What's the deal?

Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were fine

Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.

We ran for 193 yards today.

Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.

And we won by 2 TDs.

RaceBannon

Thump said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

FirePete said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again

They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.

Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.

What's the deal?

Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were fine

Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.

We ran for 193 yards today.

Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.

And we won by 2 TDs.

Yeah but take away Ahmed's run

Kidding

USC d line is legit. One of them was almost ours

I do think we're not as good against a physical D line as we would like

PurpleBaze

RaceBannon said:

Thump said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

FirePete said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again

They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.

Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.

What's the deal?

Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were fine

Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.

We ran for 193 yards today.

Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.

And we won by 2 TDs.

Yeah but take away Ahmed's run

Kidding

USC d line is legit. One of them was almost ours

I do think we're not as good against a physical D line as we would like

FTG! @MarlonsBrother

FireCohen

RaceBannon said:

Thump said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

FirePete said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Can not reliably get positive yards against USC, Bama, ASU, Penn St, Stanford, Auburn, Cal, Ohio State, Cal again, USC again

They still get beat routinely when they are upper classmen laden with studs like Adams, McGary, Harris, Hilbers, etc.

Strausser's lines were actually better seeming than Huffs despite being less talented.

What's the deal?

Dude if you can’t see that other team is also talented. I can’t help you. They were fine

Point is us not being able to run when it matters has been an ongoing problem.

We ran for 193 yards today.

Sure I'd like more, but it isn't as if they stuffed our run all day.

And we won by 2 TDs.

Yeah but take away Ahmed's run

Kidding

USC d line is legit. One of them was almost ours

I do think we're not as good against a physical D line as we would like

We are not going to steam roll those guys. The OL was ok for most part. Watty lack natural power which is hurting us sometimes