Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Behold the Rat party voter

24

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,464
    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,364 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,464
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,464
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,464
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,364 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.

    I'm sure you were outraged.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986
    edited September 2019
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.

    Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,464
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.

    I'm sure you were outraged.
    I.e., What about Obama?!?!
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,464
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.

    Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.

    blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Trump supporters have entered R Kelly supporters territory. They won’t believe any wrongdoing unless there’s a video of him doing it while the victim is holding multiple forms of government ID. That piss could be digital!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.

    Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.

    blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."
    Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,464
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.

    Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.

    blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."
    Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.
    EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,364 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.

    I'm sure you were outraged.
    I.e., What about Obama?!?!
    IE: What about your hypocrisy?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986

    Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”

    Not me, I'm looking forward to more high quality strawman ass fucks just like this.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.

    Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.

    blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."
    Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.
    EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.
    How much more abuse can the strawman's asswhole take? I think we're going to find out.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    SFGbob said:

    Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”

    Not me, I'm looking forward to more high quality strawman ass fucks just like this.
    He’s the one that said he could do it and get away with it.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986

    SFGbob said:

    Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”

    Not me, I'm looking forward to more high quality strawman ass fucks just like this.
    He’s the one that said he could do it and get away with it.
    Yeah, and you claimed that people here would excuse it by screaming “executive privilege!”

Sign In or Register to comment.