Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump’s communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff
Comments
-
RaceBannon said:
Biden story now front page news
You all got played again
Contractor journalism too? -
So your answer is no answer.HHusky said:
You’re over complicating things. The complaint should be turned over. You can investigate anything you choose to.PurpleThrobber said:
So you selectively choose who to investigate/sentence based on political ideololgy? Or is it personality that decides?HHusky said:
So far you have a few scattered dots. Connect them and we have something to discuss.PurpleThrobber said:
And Hunter/Crazy Joe? You good with their skulduggery profiteering?HHusky said:
Daddy is sometimes willing to dare you to call him on his profiteering. You’re a little naive to think you know full extent of it however.PurpleThrobber said:
Here's the difference - it's about disclosure. Trump may be offering to host a G7 event at one of his resorts...because they are the biggest and best resorts evah, you know.HHusky said:
Joe’s stance appears to have been consistent with US policy. Hunter was a board member in the company we’re talking about. You’re going to have to produce a lot more facts if you want to make this interesting. It’s hard to take you seriously when your Daddy is proposing to host the G7 at one of his properties and you don’t give a shit.RaceBannon said:Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing
It was a coincidence
But he's actually DISCLOSING that. He's not skulking around in the shadows and backrooms. Christ, who knows, maybe he's comping it. Whatever. They're going to have have a G7 somewhere and pay for it. Maybe Epstein's estate can host it on sex island....
Hunter Biden is a backroom money launderer. His shenanigans are coming out after the fact. It wasn't like Crazy Joe was disclosing to everybody and his dog that his boy Hunter was out making billion dollar deals in China and Ukraine. Because Crazy Joe wasn't. And neither was Hunter.
And, sorry, based on genetics, Hunter ain't smart enough on his own to gain access to the most powerful people in the world. He's either name dropping and Crazy Joe was giving the backdoor A-OK/wink wink signal or he's bribing his way in through other means.
Your faux outrage on Trump is noted, yet once again.
TDS! TDS! TDS!
Or just selective disclosed profiteering?
Shouldn't all illegal/unethical profiteering be ferreted out?
Those are three very easy questions to answer. Take the individuals out of it.
Go.
Or is your answer that you are fine with not investigating allegations based on political ideology and personalities?
-
I’m fine with investigating anything that meets some nominal threshold of seriousness. Say a complaint deemed credible by an IG, for instance.PurpleThrobber said:
So your answer is no answer.HHusky said:
You’re over complicating things. The complaint should be turned over. You can investigate anything you choose to.PurpleThrobber said:
So you selectively choose who to investigate/sentence based on political ideololgy? Or is it personality that decides?HHusky said:
So far you have a few scattered dots. Connect them and we have something to discuss.PurpleThrobber said:
And Hunter/Crazy Joe? You good with their skulduggery profiteering?HHusky said:
Daddy is sometimes willing to dare you to call him on his profiteering. You’re a little naive to think you know full extent of it however.PurpleThrobber said:
Here's the difference - it's about disclosure. Trump may be offering to host a G7 event at one of his resorts...because they are the biggest and best resorts evah, you know.HHusky said:
Joe’s stance appears to have been consistent with US policy. Hunter was a board member in the company we’re talking about. You’re going to have to produce a lot more facts if you want to make this interesting. It’s hard to take you seriously when your Daddy is proposing to host the G7 at one of his properties and you don’t give a shit.RaceBannon said:Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing
It was a coincidence
But he's actually DISCLOSING that. He's not skulking around in the shadows and backrooms. Christ, who knows, maybe he's comping it. Whatever. They're going to have have a G7 somewhere and pay for it. Maybe Epstein's estate can host it on sex island....
Hunter Biden is a backroom money launderer. His shenanigans are coming out after the fact. It wasn't like Crazy Joe was disclosing to everybody and his dog that his boy Hunter was out making billion dollar deals in China and Ukraine. Because Crazy Joe wasn't. And neither was Hunter.
And, sorry, based on genetics, Hunter ain't smart enough on his own to gain access to the most powerful people in the world. He's either name dropping and Crazy Joe was giving the backdoor A-OK/wink wink signal or he's bribing his way in through other means.
Your faux outrage on Trump is noted, yet once again.
TDS! TDS! TDS!
Or just selective disclosed profiteering?
Shouldn't all illegal/unethical profiteering be ferreted out?
Those are three very easy questions to answer. Take the individuals out of it.
Go.
Or is your answer that you are fine with not investigating allegations based on political ideology and personalities? -
I'm a somewhat famous journalist in my spare timeHHusky said:
DFI has been peddling fake news for the better part of two decades -
It's being investigatedHHusky said:
I’m fine with investigating anything that meets some nominal threshold of seriousness. Say a complaint deemed credible by an IG, for instance.PurpleThrobber said:
So your answer is no answer.HHusky said:
You’re over complicating things. The complaint should be turned over. You can investigate anything you choose to.PurpleThrobber said:
So you selectively choose who to investigate/sentence based on political ideololgy? Or is it personality that decides?HHusky said:
So far you have a few scattered dots. Connect them and we have something to discuss.PurpleThrobber said:
And Hunter/Crazy Joe? You good with their skulduggery profiteering?HHusky said:
Daddy is sometimes willing to dare you to call him on his profiteering. You’re a little naive to think you know full extent of it however.PurpleThrobber said:
Here's the difference - it's about disclosure. Trump may be offering to host a G7 event at one of his resorts...because they are the biggest and best resorts evah, you know.HHusky said:
Joe’s stance appears to have been consistent with US policy. Hunter was a board member in the company we’re talking about. You’re going to have to produce a lot more facts if you want to make this interesting. It’s hard to take you seriously when your Daddy is proposing to host the G7 at one of his properties and you don’t give a shit.RaceBannon said:Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing
It was a coincidence
But he's actually DISCLOSING that. He's not skulking around in the shadows and backrooms. Christ, who knows, maybe he's comping it. Whatever. They're going to have have a G7 somewhere and pay for it. Maybe Epstein's estate can host it on sex island....
Hunter Biden is a backroom money launderer. His shenanigans are coming out after the fact. It wasn't like Crazy Joe was disclosing to everybody and his dog that his boy Hunter was out making billion dollar deals in China and Ukraine. Because Crazy Joe wasn't. And neither was Hunter.
And, sorry, based on genetics, Hunter ain't smart enough on his own to gain access to the most powerful people in the world. He's either name dropping and Crazy Joe was giving the backdoor A-OK/wink wink signal or he's bribing his way in through other means.
Your faux outrage on Trump is noted, yet once again.
TDS! TDS! TDS!
Or just selective disclosed profiteering?
Shouldn't all illegal/unethical profiteering be ferreted out?
Those are three very easy questions to answer. Take the individuals out of it.
Go.
Or is your answer that you are fine with not investigating allegations based on political ideology and personalities?
Sleep well -
How do you usually investigate a complaint that you don’t have possession of?RaceBannon said:
It's being investigatedHHusky said:
I’m fine with investigating anything that meets some nominal threshold of seriousness. Say a complaint deemed credible by an IG, for instance.PurpleThrobber said:
So your answer is no answer.HHusky said:
You’re over complicating things. The complaint should be turned over. You can investigate anything you choose to.PurpleThrobber said:
So you selectively choose who to investigate/sentence based on political ideololgy? Or is it personality that decides?HHusky said:
So far you have a few scattered dots. Connect them and we have something to discuss.PurpleThrobber said:
And Hunter/Crazy Joe? You good with their skulduggery profiteering?HHusky said:
Daddy is sometimes willing to dare you to call him on his profiteering. You’re a little naive to think you know full extent of it however.PurpleThrobber said:
Here's the difference - it's about disclosure. Trump may be offering to host a G7 event at one of his resorts...because they are the biggest and best resorts evah, you know.HHusky said:
Joe’s stance appears to have been consistent with US policy. Hunter was a board member in the company we’re talking about. You’re going to have to produce a lot more facts if you want to make this interesting. It’s hard to take you seriously when your Daddy is proposing to host the G7 at one of his properties and you don’t give a shit.RaceBannon said:Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing
It was a coincidence
But he's actually DISCLOSING that. He's not skulking around in the shadows and backrooms. Christ, who knows, maybe he's comping it. Whatever. They're going to have have a G7 somewhere and pay for it. Maybe Epstein's estate can host it on sex island....
Hunter Biden is a backroom money launderer. His shenanigans are coming out after the fact. It wasn't like Crazy Joe was disclosing to everybody and his dog that his boy Hunter was out making billion dollar deals in China and Ukraine. Because Crazy Joe wasn't. And neither was Hunter.
And, sorry, based on genetics, Hunter ain't smart enough on his own to gain access to the most powerful people in the world. He's either name dropping and Crazy Joe was giving the backdoor A-OK/wink wink signal or he's bribing his way in through other means.
Your faux outrage on Trump is noted, yet once again.
TDS! TDS! TDS!
Or just selective disclosed profiteering?
Shouldn't all illegal/unethical profiteering be ferreted out?
Those are three very easy questions to answer. Take the individuals out of it.
Go.
Or is your answer that you are fine with not investigating allegations based on political ideology and personalities?
Sleep well -
A lot of multi millionaires for earning 175K a year.......
-
HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
-
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism.
-
They’re in panic mode and furiously lashing out with whatever comes into their feeble minds. Please don’t take them seriously.HHusky said:
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism. -
The phone call in and of itself shows a gross abuse of power especially when combined with the timeline on military aid. Apparently the call is just one part of the overall complaint. Maybe the Trump appointed IG is just a partisan smear merchant....HHusky said:
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism. -
Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
Yes.RaceBannon said:Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
DisagreeCirrhosisDawg said:
Yes.RaceBannon said:Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
How would you know?RaceBannon said:
DisagreeCirrhosisDawg said:
Yes.RaceBannon said:Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
What does this mean?CirrhosisDawg said:
How would you know?RaceBannon said:
DisagreeCirrhosisDawg said:
Yes.RaceBannon said:Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
See?RaceBannon said:
What does this mean?CirrhosisDawg said:
How would you know?RaceBannon said:
DisagreeCirrhosisDawg said:
Yes.RaceBannon said:Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
NoCirrhosisDawg said:
See?RaceBannon said:
What does this mean?CirrhosisDawg said:
How would you know?RaceBannon said:
DisagreeCirrhosisDawg said:
Yes.RaceBannon said:Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
Of course not.RaceBannon said:
NoCirrhosisDawg said:
See?RaceBannon said:
What does this mean?CirrhosisDawg said:
How would you know?RaceBannon said:
DisagreeCirrhosisDawg said:
Yes.RaceBannon said:Is there a bigger bunch of rubes than Muellertards?
-
Wanting a foreign government to investigate possible corruption in their country involving a former American VP is an abuse of power. Got it.GDS said:
The phone call in and of itself shows a gross abuse of power especially when combined with the timeline on military aid. Apparently the call is just one part of the overall complaint. Maybe the Trump appointed IG is just a partisan smear merchant....HHusky said:
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism.
But Biden withhold a loan guarantee of a billion dollar in order to secure the firing of the prosecutor looking into the corruption involving his son, naaaaah, no abuse of power there. -
The TrumpTrash meltdown is an epically beautiful thing to behold. Dance trumptard! Faster!SFGbob said:
Wanting a foreign government to investigate possible corruption in their country involving a former American VP is an abuse of power. Got it.GDS said:
The phone call in and of itself shows a gross abuse of power especially when combined with the timeline on military aid. Apparently the call is just one part of the overall complaint. Maybe the Trump appointed IG is just a partisan smear merchant....HHusky said:
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism.
But Biden withhold a loan guarantee of a billion dollar in order to secure the firing of the prosecutor looking into the corruption involving his son, naaaaah, no abuse of power there. -
Obunghole lickers have their hopes dashed once again!CirrhosisDawg said:
The TrumpTrash meltdown is an epically beautiful thing to behold. Dance trumptard! Faster!SFGbob said:
Wanting a foreign government to investigate possible corruption in their country involving a former American VP is an abuse of power. Got it.GDS said:
The phone call in and of itself shows a gross abuse of power especially when combined with the timeline on military aid. Apparently the call is just one part of the overall complaint. Maybe the Trump appointed IG is just a partisan smear merchant....HHusky said:
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism.
But Biden withhold a loan guarantee of a billion dollar in order to secure the firing of the prosecutor looking into the corruption involving his son, naaaaah, no abuse of power there. -
Such a clear white flag. Too stupid to address anything I actually said, goes with TrumpTrash.CirrhosisDawg said:
The TrumpTrash meltdown is an epically beautiful thing to behold. Dance trumptard! Faster!SFGbob said:
Wanting a foreign government to investigate possible corruption in their country involving a former American VP is an abuse of power. Got it.GDS said:
The phone call in and of itself shows a gross abuse of power especially when combined with the timeline on military aid. Apparently the call is just one part of the overall complaint. Maybe the Trump appointed IG is just a partisan smear merchant....HHusky said:
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism.
But Biden withhold a loan guarantee of a billion dollar in order to secure the firing of the prosecutor looking into the corruption involving his son, naaaaah, no abuse of power there. -
Clinton debris.SFGbob said:
Such a clear white flag. Too stupid to address anything I actually said, goes with TrumpTrash.CirrhosisDawg said:
The TrumpTrash meltdown is an epically beautiful thing to behold. Dance trumptard! Faster!SFGbob said:
Wanting a foreign government to investigate possible corruption in their country involving a former American VP is an abuse of power. Got it.GDS said:
The phone call in and of itself shows a gross abuse of power especially when combined with the timeline on military aid. Apparently the call is just one part of the overall complaint. Maybe the Trump appointed IG is just a partisan smear merchant....HHusky said:
LA Times:salemcoog said:HHusky said:
In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.2001400ex said:
I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.GDS said:
Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?HHusky said:
I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.salemcoog said:
Link to proof of a coverup please.HHusky said:
Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.salemcoog said:
You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be factHHusky said:
Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.salemcoog said:
So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?HHusky said:
The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.RaceBannon said:Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?
Whew! Easy turbo.
Have you not learned a thing from burning up upon re-entry all of these other times?
"The whistleblower complaint was filed on Aug. 12 with the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, who notified the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 9 because he considered the complaint 'urgent' and 'credible.'
Atkinson, a former federal prosecutor who was appointed to his current position by Trump, stressed the urgency of the matter in a second letter on Sept. 17, saying it 'relates to one of the most significant and important of the [director of national intelligence’s] responsibilities to the American people.'" (emphasis mine)
You girls are remarkably lacking in curiosity. Tribalism.
But Biden withhold a loan guarantee of a billion dollar in order to secure the firing of the prosecutor looking into the corruption involving his son, naaaaah, no abuse of power there.
