Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Trump’s communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff

16781012

Comments

  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,388
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited September 2019
    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,368
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,368
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Trump is covering up that he didn't commit a crime

    Again

    You'd think Trump used a fake Russian dossier to spy on Biden

  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    No, he just gave him connections that all came from his position in Government.
  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,956
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    GDS said:

    The Ukraine prosecutor had tracked several million in wire transfers back to the US (Hunter Biden) when he got fired.

    HondoFS joined by GodDamnStupid and company running cover for this...

    The several million you are thinking of was all that cash that was flowing to Manafort. Biden's company was being paid about 166k a month to do consulting work for Burmisa including Hunter being on the board alongside many other foreign nationals. The prosecutor didn't need to track that money as it was all reported. Hell they even issued a press release about hiring him to "consult the company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities”.

    What else ya got?
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    HondoBros out in force...they must realize its not a good look for Biden.

    A timeline:
    Feb 2014: Obama puts Biden in charge of Ukrainian policy.
    April 2014: Joe Biden meets with Devon Archer at the same time Archer was placed on the board at Burisma.
    May 2014: Hunter Biden, complete fuck-up, somehow with all of his "skills" gets named to the board of Burisma.
    April 2014 - Oct 2015 monthly wire transfers of ~$166,000/month were made from Burisma to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, LLC, of which a portion (usually ~$25-$50k/month) went to Hunter Biden.
    Late 2015/early 2016: Ukrainian prosecutor begins investigation into Burisma corruption, including why money was being wired to the United States for no obvious work/reason.
    Early 2016: Ukrainian prosecutor sets up plans for interrogations of the board of Burisma.
    March 2016 - Biden force Ukraine to fire the prosecutor focusing on Burisma

    And no GDS...the 'they all look alike' defense doesn't work. This is a natural gas company...has nothing to do with Ukrainian political campaigns. The wire transfers went to "Rosemont Seneca Bohai, LLC", which is directly linked to Hunter Biden and has nothing at all in any way, shape or form to do with Manafort.

    Keep pumping this up...it won't be a good look for Biden when it all comes out. Trump must think Pocahontas is easier to beat than Biden even in his reduced mental state...only reason I can think this came out this early.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    A lot of butthurt Trump supported in here. Love the but but but Obama and Biden and Bidens son conversation. Pussies. Own Trump's actions.

    Yeah, how dare people actually discuss the detail of what Trump was asking for. What a dumbfuck.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,388
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    Daddy has no legal power to have any input on this.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    GDS said:

    The Ukraine prosecutor had tracked several million in wire transfers back to the US (Hunter Biden) when he got fired.

    HondoFS joined by GodDamnStupid and company running cover for this...

    The several million you are thinking of was all that cash that was flowing to Manafort. Biden's company was being paid about 166k a month to do consulting work for Burmisa including Hunter being on the board alongside many other foreign nationals. The prosecutor didn't need to track that money as it was all reported. Hell they even issued a press release about hiring him to "consult the company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities”.

    What else ya got?
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    HondoBros out in force...they must realize its not a good look for Biden.

    A timeline:
    Feb 2014: Obama puts Biden in charge of Ukrainian policy.
    April 2014: Joe Biden meets with Devon Archer at the same time Archer was placed on the board at Burisma.
    May 2014: Hunter Biden, complete fuck-up, somehow with all of his "skills" gets named to the board of Burisma.
    April 2014 - Oct 2015 monthly wire transfers of ~$166,000/month were made from Burisma to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, LLC, of which a portion (usually ~$25-$50k/month) went to Hunter Biden.
    Late 2015/early 2016: Ukrainian prosecutor begins investigation into Burisma corruption, including why money was being wired to the United States for no obvious work/reason.
    Early 2016: Ukrainian prosecutor sets up plans for interrogations of the board of Burisma.
    March 2016 - Biden force Ukraine to fire the prosecutor focusing on Burisma

    And no GDS...the 'they all look alike' defense doesn't work. This is a natural gas company...has nothing to do with Ukrainian political campaigns. The wire transfers went to "Rosemont Seneca Bohai, LLC", which is directly linked to Hunter Biden and has nothing at all in any way, shape or form to do with Manafort.

    Keep pumping this up...it won't be a good look for Biden when it all comes out. Trump must think Pocahontas is easier to beat than Biden even in his reduced mental state...only reason I can think this came out this early.
    Hondo thinks we're not supposed to discuss the details of what Trump was asking them to investigate.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,368
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    Daddy has no legal power to have any input on this.
    Bullshit
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,368
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    H wants the CIA to run the country if the election goes against his girl
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,388
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    Daddy has no legal power to have any input on this.
    Bullshit
    Your legal scholarship is legendary.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,368
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
    They're not giving it to Schiff because he leaks like your diaper

    There will be a hearing and you'll run and hide yet again with another lie exposed

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,388
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited September 2019
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    No, he just gave him connections that all came from his position in Government.
    He “gave” him his connections? How’d he do that blob? Is there a connection ceremony?
  • Options
    UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,500
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
    Would love to see all the records of every Dem in Congress' bank accounts for idk, the last 20 years. If there's nothing to hide and they did nothing wrong, what are they afraid of?
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
    Would love to see all the records of every Dem in Congress' bank accounts for idk, the last 20 years. If there's nothing to hide and they did nothing wrong, what are they afraid of?
    That's a terrible analogy
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,388
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
    They're not giving it to Schiff because he leaks like your diaper

    There will be a hearing and you'll run and hide yet again with another lie exposed

    Not really an explanation for refusing to turn this “nothing burger” over in compliance with the law.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…

    So it appears that O'Keefed is upset because he doesn't want Biden investigated.

    Yet Daddy’s coverup continues. How odd.
    Yeah, I like to call exercising EP a "cover-up"

    What law requires a President to release the details of private conversations they've had with other foreign leaders.

    Asked you that question yesterday, of course you dodged it like the Kunt you are.

    C'mon Bob, are you really this stupid or just being a bitchass partisan kunt as usual? whynotboth.gif

    The coverup is the Trump administration and the DOJ are blocking Congress from getting ahold of the whisteblower's report. If there's nothing to hide and he did nothing wrong, why are they afraid of?
    Or I could just be a lying piece of shit like you are. But I'm not.
Sign In or Register to comment.