Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump’s communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff

123468

Comments

  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    Guess Gasbag doesn’t have an innocent explanation for the coverup either.

    Crackerjack lawyer doesn’t know that the burden of proof falls on the accuser I guess.
    Coverup proven. Your lack of curiosity about the motive noted.
    You believing that anything is proven by what has come out today further denigrates your credibility of being a real barrister.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    edited September 2019


    “You believing that anything is proven by what has come out today further denigrates your credibility of being a real barrister.”

    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    edited September 2019
    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    edited September 2019
    HoustonHusky said:

    The Ukraine prosecutor had tracked several million in wire transfers back to the US (Hunter Biden) when he got fired.

    HondoFS joined by GodDamnStupid and company running cover for this...

    The several million you are thinking of was all that cash that was flowing to Manafort. Biden's company was being paid about 166k a month to do consulting work for Burmisa including Hunter being on the board alongside many other foreign nationals. The prosecutor didn't need to track that money as it was all reported. Hell they even issued a press release about hiring him to "consult the company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities”.

    What else ya got?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,659 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    How many times have you trotted this out?


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,659 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    In this case the coverup is entirely in the open and plainly illegal. Daddy counts on the deplorables to back him and dares the nutless wonders in his own party to give a damn. The reason Bart is on the Supreme Court despite not having been on Daddy’s original list of judges is because he thinks the President is also the King. Daddy needs to be above the law to get away with this.

    How many times have you trotted this out?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    It’s up to you to explain what was “shady” about his business dealings. So far I haven’t even seen you tell us what he received.
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    So you don’t know what he got but you want me to justify him getting it. I can’t imagine why people think you’re dishonest.
    Justify? What the fuck are you talking about Kunt? I just asked you if he would have gotten the gig if his dad wasn't the VP. I never said I didn't know what he got. I was just trying get you to answer a fucking question before responding to your diversion. He "got" a directorship at the gas company and business for his law-firm. I assume none of this was done as charity work so he "got" money.

    You've become such a pathetic Kunt O'Keefed you now think everyone is like you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    WSJ comes out against Trump.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176?mod=breakingnews
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    How many times have you trotted this out?


    And it's fact. I'm sorry if it makes your butt pucker.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    insinceredawg said:

    Gay Bob thinks Republicans are innocent til proven guilty but Democrats are guilty til proven innocent. And he wonders why I call him a bitchass partisan kunt.

    You have any examples or evidence to support that ignorant twat of mouth of yours Kunt or is this just your standard drive by Kunt act?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 18,026
    So what I'm gathering from this thread is that the hammer is dropping any day now...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Gay Bob thinks Republicans are innocent no matter what evidence there is but Democrats are always guilty. And he wonders why I call him a bitchass partisan kunt.

    FIFY
    Tongue that ass Hondo. Care to provide and example in support of your Kunt of a friend Hondo?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    edited September 2019
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of complaining that connected people have certain advantages in life. What a snowflake!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited September 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    GDS said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Did he tell them to wait until he was reelected so he had more flexibility?

    The inevitable false equivalency. Thanks for not disappointing.
    So what is the context and which leader was Trump speaking with?
    Rudy’s denial/confirmation leads us to think it was a promise to release the Ukraine’s aid money to them just as soon as Ukraine starts digging up dirt on Biden.
    You believe anything that your sources qweef out of their slit. So another nothing burger and more Hondo Bros tears are the only things that have been proven to be fact
    Only the coverup is proven so far. I’ve not said anything to the contrary.
    Link to proof of a coverup please.
    I’m pretty sure the Intelligence Committees of the House and Senate are still waiting for the legally mandatory delivery of the whistleblower complaint. Coverup. Proven.
    Wondering if Coats departure is caught up in all this. The call in question happened on July 25th. Trump announced Coats departure on July 28th. If he hadn't been fired/asked to resign Coats would have been the one delivering the legally mandated report to congress that the Trump nominated IG felt was "urgent" and "serious". Could just be a coincidence?
    I don't know if that's true or not. But it's always the cover up they gets politicians in trouble. Not the actual action.
    How many times have you trotted this out?


    I've seen about a half a dozen times in my short time here. He feels it's some kind of real deeeeep and insightful analysis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    WSJ comes out against Trump.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176?mod=breakingnews

    They came out with a story. That's not an OpEd dumbfuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,623 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Other than dad threatening the Ukraine if they investigate his sons billion dollar deal sure nothing

    It was a coincidence

    Come on, you wouldn't expect O'Keefed to have an ounce of integrity would you?
    You mentioned integrity and the subject is an attorney! Hahahahahahahahaha!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,623 Standard Supporter
    insinceredawg said:

    Gay Bob thinks Republicans are innocent til proven guilty but Democrats are guilty til proven innocent. And he wonders why I call him a bitchass partisan kunt.

    Said the Trump impeachment supporter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    WSJ comes out against Trump.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176?mod=breakingnews

    From the article that you obviously didn't read:

    Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on an investigation…


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,862
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Removal of the corrupt government, including the prosecutor, was US policy, blob. Meanwhile, Rudy says there’s nothing wrong with conditioning US aid on the Ukraine’s willingness to investigate Daddy’s political opponents. Your crocodile tears over self-dealing are super convincing.


    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/11/06/ivanka-trump-gets-initial-approval-from-china-for-16-trademarks.html


    Removal of the prosecutor was US policy but Biden's son having shady business dealings that wasn't US policy and you didn't give a fuck about that O'Keefed.

    Do you think Biden's son would have been able to secure that deal if he was the son of a plumber or do you think his daddy's position might of had something to do with it?

    I don't care what Rudy says, I care what has actually been done.
    Blob what exactly was Biden's son's "shady business dealings"? He's been a very prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager for some time. Being named as a member of the board of directors was consistent with his career. Did he do something in his role as a member of the board that was corrupt or illegal? Let's hear the evidence.
    Yeah, a prominent lawyer and hedge fund manager who's business has been helped greatly by his daddy's connections.
    So “shady” is blob’s way of saying connected people have advantages. What a snowflake!
    Gosh weren't you the Kunt who just a few short hours ago was complaining about Trump's self-dealing and profiteering? What's it like being a hypocritical piece of shit O'Keefed. So now, using your daddy's connections to enrich yourself is okay. Oh yeah, Biden's business partner on this deal was none other than the Secretary of State's son. Weird how we didn't hears any completes "profiteering" then.

    Why it's almost as if you're nothing more than a shitty lawyer and a shameless hack.
    You’re gonna have a great argument as soon as Hunter runs for President. Daddy’s afraid of Joe, not Hunter.
    Got it, it's okay for the Biden's son to profit from his daddy's position.


    Did Joe give him the position?

    Don Jr is an Executive VP in Daddy’s company. Now you’re making me question whether that is solely due to his business acumen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter