New York Times hits Brett Kavanaugh with new allegation from 1980s
Comments
-
Here’s how Hilary can still win...
-
Ford did it for abortion. What's the hook this time? The left is heavy on the ends justifying the means.
-
I hope they have their calendars ready.
-
Love how the actual female involved claims it never happened. But why would that be important or hinder the smearing by former journalists who are now nothing more than partisan hacks.
It’s a FS smear for the HondoFS folks of the world. -
-
Link? Or are you lying as usual?HoustonHusky said:Love how the actual female involved claims it never happened. But why would that be important or hinder the smearing by former journalists who are now nothing more than partisan hacks.
It’s a FS smear for the HondoFS folks of the world. -
Huh?HoustonHusky said:Love how the actual female involved claims it never happened. But why would that be important or hinder the smearing by former journalists who are now nothing more than partisan hacks.
It’s a FS smear for the HondoFS folks of the world. -
HondoFS needs a Politifact reference? How’s the Beto gun one working for you. A good reference would be...I don’t know...the upcoming book from the same authors as the article.
You could say they lack journalistic integrity by leaving that little fact out of their article when even they have to admit it in their book. But that would assume they are journalists and not partisan hacks.
Makes one think RBG must not be in good health as well... -
ThomasFremont said:
Huh?HoustonHusky said:Love how the actual female involved claims it never happened. But why would that be important or hinder the smearing by former journalists who are now nothing more than partisan hacks.
It’s a FS smear for the HondoFS folks of the world.
The woman who some Liberal named Max Stier claims Kavanaugh harassed by putting his D in her hand in a drunken party said it didn’t happen.
I’m sure that’s not pertinent to the discussion though when it involves smearing a conservative. -
You listen to too much Rush Limbaugh.HoustonHusky said:HondoFS needs a Politifact reference? How’s the Beto gun one working for you. A good reference would be...I don’t know...the upcoming book from the same authors as the article.
You could say they lack journalistic integrity by leaving that little fact out of their article when even they have to admit it in their book. But that would assume they are journalists and not partisan hacks.
Makes one think RBG must not be in good health as well...
