Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We're #23!!!!

1356

Comments

  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    edited September 2019
    creepycoug said:

    Miami 2001 would have trampled - I'm using the word TRAMPLED - 2005 Texas. 1991 probably would have too.

    Say what you will about 1991 Miami, their defense was stingy af and didn't give up points.

    The team that led the nation in rushing, was third in total offense and third in scoring never got inside the Miami 20-yard line, ran for only 82 yards and gained 171 yards in total offense.

    Not top 25? What are you smoking ese?

    The historic computer rankings play out my narrative objectively. UW's strength of record is way better.


    Here is just one link to one system you're probably familiar with, through the 2012 season.

    https://www.huskermax.com/rating.html
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    YellowSnow said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    creepycoug said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.

    None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.

    Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
    Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
    Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
    2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,429 Founders Club
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    creepycoug said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.

    None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.

    Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
    Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
    Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
    2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
    Shut the fuck up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,527 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2019
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    creepycoug said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.

    None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.

    Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
    Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
    Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
    2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
    Jesus.You are deranged.

    3-star Stan Empterman would have snapped every single skill player for Oregon in half. Then pissed on their lifeless bodies just for fun.

    And then lit them on fire.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • digits
    digits Member Posts: 1,843
    If u consider a list compiled by ESPN is legit at all, I can't help you.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    creepycoug said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.

    None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.

    Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
    Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
    2001 UM at #7 and UW 91 at #23?

    Complete piece of shit pole, totally laughable, fuck off and die to whomever was dumb enough to have their stupid name associated with it.

    That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    MelloDawg said:

    Not sure why the 1888 Yale team is so low. If you look at their tape, the defense is better than even their numbers suggested.

    For real though. 0 PA the entire season

    Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited September 2019
    haie said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    YellowSnow said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    creepycoug said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.

    None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.

    Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
    Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
    Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
    2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
    Shut the fuck up.
    WSU doesn't have a horse in this race. Go back to your Pullman apartment and call it a night, cooglet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,281
    edited September 2019
    Mad_Son said:

    creepycoug said:

    Miami 2001 would have trampled - I'm using the word TRAMPLED - 2005 Texas. 1991 probably would have too.

    Say what you will about 1991 Miami, their defense was stingy af and didn't give up points.

    The team that led the nation in rushing, was third in total offense and third in scoring never got inside the Miami 20-yard line, ran for only 82 yards and gained 171 yards in total offense.

    Not top 25? What are you smoking ese?

    The historic computer rankings play out my narrative objectively. UW's strength of record is way better.


    Here is just one link to one system you're probably familiar with, through the 2012 season.

    https://www.huskermax.com/rating.html
    Way better than what? Are we comparing 1991 UW to 1991 Miami? Because their respective SOS that season was comparable.

    If you're linking me to some fucking computer model that ranks the best teams across years based on some algo, save it. It's as good as the guy who made it up and is no better at licking your finger, holding it in the wind and making an assessment based on judgment.

    My comment was to your comment that 1991 Miami isn't even top 25, which is an absurd position. They belong there over 2000 Oklahoma, as but one example, rather easily. There aren't many defenses that could hold Nebraska under 100 yards rushing for a game back in those days. You can argue all you want about UW 1991 belonging in the top 10; you won't get any argument from me. But throwing Miami 1991 under the bus and out of the Top 25 to make your point is FS because their schedules weren't all that different and their common opponents make the comparison a little muddy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter